Ruckus46Gt

iTrader: (9)

i beg to differ here is my old little 2v n/a it made 298, hooked and went. It put down less hp then a mach 1 is with bolt ons.
http://myspacetv.com/index.cfm?fusea...ideoid=3780962

dyno

slip

for comparison my ss

Almostryan3

iTrader: (6)

Isn't it 3600 vig stall? I helped him get that 7.7 and the low 1.6 60'

camarojunky74

iTrader: (14)

wow nice proof there ruckus,
someone just got owned

180ls1

iTrader: (4)

what you forgot to mention was the right front head light delete. My friend did that and it made a huge difference in weight transfer.

but that is a damn stout n/a 2v, that is a nice car and a good build.

eddielb

hahaha thats some good driving ruckus, I was looking all over mustang boards and no one posted anywhere near the times you did, lots of supporting suspension mods ? I mean **** your lifting the front end hahaha

Ruckus46Gt

iTrader: (9)

here is even a step further one of my good friends back home's vert with hci 2v


video proof
http://s268.photobucket.com/albums/j...nt=Default.flv

bolt on auto 2v pushing 262/295 to the tire


a bolt on 5.0


these are all friends of mine back east . I can post up for if you'd like

eddielb

head cam intake right ? how much power they make w/ those mods ? Thats coo they have better rear ends thats us obviously they can launch harder until we swap out our rears eh ><

180ls1

iTrader: (4)

a lot of the guys end up swapping out the rears of the mustangs too because they are irs just like the gto. So that is not a really big deal but they are stronger then ours.

Snowman2K1

iTrader: (1)

+1

Ruckus46Gt

iTrader: (9)

only 99 up cobras has irs's reg mustangs dont. To answer the other question a hci 2v (not 4v) will make about 340-350rwhp.

eddielb

so I dyno at 355 hp right now, if I get drag radials and skinnys im going to lift my car off the ground like that ? Lol do they weight much less than our cars do or something ?

Ruckus46Gt

iTrader: (9)

Well I'll break it down like this my camaro ss is 3626 with me in it and runs 12.5@108. My little 2v was 3250, car had more in it cant really hear it but was having issues with the tranny that day. My 2v i ran in good da's my ss hasnt seen a da below 2600 (think i had a 2600 day most are 3k days). My 2v had a lot of work i dialed in the suspension it had a tubular kmember, drag launch springs, lca, uca, slicks & skinnies, alum driveshaft, alum flywheel , battery in the trunk, you name it. My ss has lca's, lowering springs, and 17" rims with drag radials (just added relocation brackets at this time no change to 60'). I have skinnies sitting on my floor and in 2 weeks my rear drag rims will be in. That should put my car at around 3580 or so and then we will see

camarojunky74

iTrader: (14)

yeah ruckus just clarified only 99+ cobras have it, mach 1's are a solid mustang due to the solid rear and the 4v motor, a strong car for sure but all other stangs still have a live axle rear

cruiSSin LS1

iTrader: (2)

i texted u this morning...got no response...what the hell bro???haha

camarojunky74

iTrader: (14)

really i never got it... if its about installing headers,
the number your trying to reach has been disconnected or is no longer in sevice, if you reached this recording in error hang up and try again.

Almostryan3

iTrader: (6)

See there is the difference between your old 2v and most of the ones that guy was talking about, you had full suspension pretty much and had it dialed in pretty damn well.

Almostryan3

iTrader: (6)

Thats why that guy was saying he hasn't seen the cars go real fast with the mods, crappy drivers and stock suspension.

pweterss

iTrader: (3)

well off track a little,,,the 08 ss impala ran a 9.333 at irwindale..pretty good i think for a bone stock 5.3ltr. with a sorry 60 ft of 2.32somthin.

Ruckus46Gt

iTrader: (9)

265/295 through an auto stock suspension (sorry has a prokit springs)

Almostryan3

iTrader: (6)

With no humidity and -0010 ft below sea level right?