Pictures of MT 295/45/17's D/R on F-body PLEASE
12-16-2008, 08:47 AM
#22
by the way there not to tall i think there perfect height , i hate the wheel-well space thats left with my BF 315/35/17 D/R
The extra inch in height looks nice,
but yes the M+H 325/45/17 looks stupid , much to tall, and jacked up looking thats why i am not going to be getting those, altho they work GREAT! , i dont like the jacked up look,
only if they were a inch shorter and a inch wider they would be the perfect tire for our cars,
Maybe ill give John a call at M+H and let him know
The extra inch in height looks nice,
but yes the M+H 325/45/17 looks stupid , much to tall, and jacked up looking thats why i am not going to be getting those, altho they work GREAT! , i dont like the jacked up look,
only if they were a inch shorter and a inch wider they would be the perfect tire for our cars,
Maybe ill give John a call at M+H and let him know
the 295/45/17 tire due to other mfr constraints. They agreed but
weren't clear if they were actually gonna make one.
I have the M+H 325/45 but hate the look and the huge 88" rollout (lost 3mph).
They work well but in that size so would a John Deere tractor tire.
my .02
