Wheels & Tires Forged | Billet | Cast | Radials | Slicks

Black C5 Z's (Pics)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-04-2009, 03:06 PM
  #21  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
StealthFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Skippack, PA
Posts: 4,798
Received 54 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BlkmagicC4
I think the problem is that you are stuck on the 17 inch rim and the 1980's look of the bulgy tire. Welcome to the 21st century.
Bro I would just let it rest, everybody is going to bitch about it because it's not the common tire size choice for a rim that wide. All that matters is that you like it! And you do so that's good.

In that guy's defense:

-'93-'02 Firehawks, '96-'02 WS6's, and '96-'02 SS's all came from the factory with 17x9 wheels equipped with 275's.
-C5 Vettes (Non Z06) have 17x8.5 fronts with 245's and 18x9.5 rears with 275's from factory.
-C6 Vettes (Non Z06) have 18x8.5s in the front with 255's from the factory.
-C6 Z06's have 18x9.5 fronts with 275's from the factory.

275's are generally accepted as the correct tire width for 9-9.5" wheels as 255's have been for 8.5" so you will get heat about it no matter what you say so I would just ignore everybodies opinion.
Old 11-04-2009, 03:17 PM
  #22  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
BlkmagicC4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Newtown, PA
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Black_Z28
Umm, no he's not stuck in the 21st century. I think it looks odd too, as well as other have noted. I have 285s on my car, and they have that same look. It just looks like the tire is too narrow for the wheel. You don't want a convex look, you want the tire to look just as wide as the wheel.
Well let me educate you. I see you don't like to read but I mentioned earlier in the thread the tire is WIDER than the wheel. The rim is 241.3mm wide and the tire is 255mm wide. This is just the shape of the Vredestein tire. The 295 on the 10.5 rim looks the same way on my dad's car. The rim protector in the pictures don't do the tires justice in real life.
Old 11-04-2009, 04:06 PM
  #23  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Black_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BlkmagicC4
Well let me educate you. I see you don't like to read but I mentioned earlier in the thread the tire is WIDER than the wheel. The rim is 241.3mm wide and the tire is 255mm wide. This is just the shape of the Vredestein tire. The 295 on the 10.5 rim looks the same way on my dad's car. The rim protector in the pictures don't do the tires justice in real life.
I don't like to read, ok buddy.

The actually tire is wider then your wheel. But the tread width is not. That's why if you put a 315 on a 9.5", it bulges, that's because the tread width is wider then the wheel. And in your case, it's smaller, so it does the opposite.

The rim protector will be the same on any wheel the tire will fit on, even a 11" wheel. Because the protector is so close to the lip of the rim. The sidewall is stiff enough that it doesn't allow it to deflect enough to cause exposure of the lip.

Nice work on educating me.
Old 11-04-2009, 10:03 PM
  #24  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
BlkmagicC4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Newtown, PA
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Black_Z28
I don't like to read, ok buddy.

The actually tire is wider then your wheel. But the tread width is not. That's why if you put a 315 on a 9.5", it bulges, that's because the tread width is wider then the wheel. And in your case, it's smaller, so it does the opposite.

The rim protector will be the same on any wheel the tire will fit on, even a 11" wheel. Because the protector is so close to the lip of the rim. The sidewall is stiff enough that it doesn't allow it to deflect enough to cause exposure of the lip.

Nice work on educating me.
The approved rim width range for a 255 40 tire is 8.5 to 10.0 inches. This information is readily available on the internet, for example on The Tirerack website. The middle of this approved rim width range is 9.25 inches. Therefore, my 9.5 rim is virtually perfect for this tire size. Moreover, this tire size maintains the OEM steering scrub radius because it nearly has the same diameter as the OEM 255 45 17 tire. Function is more important than looks, and this setup works well, and looks great IMO, particularly in the flesh.

If in your opinion, you dont like the way these tires look on these rims, thats fine with me. Your opinion, however, does not change the fact that these tires fit these wheels and the car perfectly.
Old 11-04-2009, 10:18 PM
  #25  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
BlkmagicC4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Newtown, PA
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by StealthFormula
Bro I would just let it rest, everybody is going to bitch about it because it's not the common tire size choice for a rim that wide. All that matters is that you like it! And you do so that's good.

In that guy's defense:

-'93-'02 Firehawks, '96-'02 WS6's, and '96-'02 SS's all came from the factory with 17x9 wheels equipped with 275's.
-C5 Vettes (Non Z06) have 17x8.5 fronts with 245's and 18x9.5 rears with 275's from factory.
-C6 Vettes (Non Z06) have 18x8.5s in the front with 255's from the factory.
-C6 Z06's have 18x9.5 fronts with 275's from the factory.

275's are generally accepted as the correct tire width for 9-9.5" wheels as 255's have been for 8.5" so you will get heat about it no matter what you say so I would just ignore everybodies opinion.
The approved rim width range for a 275 tire is 9-11, and 8.5-10 for 255s. The general audience must like rims on the narrow side of the approved rim width range. Matches their narrow minds.
Old 04-18-2010, 08:25 PM
  #26  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
SlowFRC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DC Suburbs
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlkmagicC4
I think the problem is that you are stuck on the 17 inch rim and the 1980's look of the bulgy tire. Welcome to the 21st century.
I think the problem is you have a cammed lt1 that doesn't even trap 110. Generally you have a problem fitting rubbers on your equipment.
Old 04-18-2010, 08:32 PM
  #27  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (15)
 
speedracer2536's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

HAHAHA here we go.. a pissing match
Old 04-19-2010, 01:39 PM
  #28  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
z34_nut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SlowFRC
I think the problem is you have a cammed lt1 that doesn't even trap 110. Generally you have a problem fitting rubbers on your equipment.
I think you read his signature to fast... Those times were prior cam swap... lol.

Anyway...
Old 04-19-2010, 01:56 PM
  #29  
TECH Apprentice
 
'02TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Nice car OP, lovin C4's more and more these days!! Looks
Old 04-20-2010, 02:48 PM
  #30  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
SlowFRC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DC Suburbs
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by z34_nut
I think you read his signature to fast... Those times were prior cam swap... lol.

Anyway...
I know him IRL, i was right about his trap with a cam, he ran those bolt on times in -2000da...
Old 04-20-2010, 10:27 PM
  #31  
Staging Lane
 
camvette91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Laredo,TX
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They look good!
Old 04-21-2010, 11:24 AM
  #32  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
mattyj385's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

where did you get the all black wheels?
Old 04-21-2010, 12:08 PM
  #33  
Customizing Director
iTrader: (12)
 
MadIceV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SW Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,778
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Rear looks good. Car does need to be dropped.. Front tire's are to small. I would have went with a 275 up front (looks like you are running 255).




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 AM.