6.5"-7" sub comparison
Put it this way: Extremis for SPL, ED or Mpyre for quality.
EDIT: Nevermind, I've convinced myself that (a) is the same thing that you said.
Last edited by fredmr39; Feb 6, 2007 at 01:22 AM.
EDIT: Nevermind, I've convinced myself that (a) is the same thing that you said.
a speaker 3 dB more efficient than another demands HALF as much power
>>>
"demands"
intresting....hmmm
I guess that would depend on the amp and the load it seeks...to make said counterpart worthy?
a speaker 3 dB more efficient than another demands HALF as much power
>>>
"demands"
intresting....hmmm
I guess that would depend on the amp and the load it seeks...to make said counterpart worthy? 
Kinda funny, you would have to mention fish.
I'll try not to feed them too much mojo.
I think so far as I can tell it will be very fine.
Futher testing/daily usage will finally tell the tale, ( i can't wait to flog it hard ) and see what coughs up first.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
EDIT: Nevermind, I've convinced myself that (a) is the same thing that you said.

In any case, I think you may have misconstrued a prior comment I made about how inefficient the factory speakers are and how a difference of only 3dB more sensitivity will normally make up for the volume loss from increased impedance. This was stated from experience, not mathematics. There are other things besides sensitivity and impedance that influence the apparent volume of any given set of speakers and I've found that aftermarket replacements generally don't suffer much (if any) volume loss for being 4-ohm instead of 2-ohm. Unfortunately I don't have any sensitivity specs for the factory speakers so it's all guesswork.
I found this in the FAQ posted by whitebird00:
The amp is a small eight-channel unit mounted on a bracket on the right quarter inner fenderwell (hatch area of a coupe, trunk of a convertible). It powers a mix of 2-ohm and 4-ohm speakers. The 97 and some early 98 models came with a 200 watt amp that was physically smaller than later models. The rest of 98 through 99 came with an amp that was rated at 200-watts RMS. For 2000 and later models, GM changed their advertising to rate the very same amp at 500-watts. Some say this is a peak rating while others just consider it an ILS (If Lightning Strikes) rating. GM also claimed an RMS rating of 240-watts for this amp but the original 200-watt rating given to the amp is probably more accurate. In any case, there is no point is trying to upgrade a 98 or 99 to the "more powerful" 500-watt amp of later years - it's exactly the same amp.
(b) If a sound gets louder by 3 dB it is only a little louder, but takes double the power from your amp to produce a noticeable increase in volume. (and as mentioned 6-10 dB to sound double the volume.....with 10 dB requiring TEN times the power).
---
I have always had those two ideas in my head...I know (b) is true, and is not saying the same thing as (a)...but for some reason...I had always thought that (a) was true too...
EDIT: I Googled (a), and found the following - figures it does come from the BestBuy link though:
"...a speaker that's a mere 3 dB more efficient than another demands only half as much power from your amp to reach the same volume. A speaker that's 6 dB more sensitive needs only a quarter as much power!"






