Advanced Engineering Tech For the more hardcore LS1TECH residents

LS1 Reverse Cooling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-2005, 07:39 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Art_H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default LS1 Reverse Cooling

I Read the FAQ section about the reasons why GM went back to the traditional cooling style Block-Heads. Has anybody Changed the LS1 to reverse cooling? If so what were the results etc.

Also, those casting plugs on the LS1 heads (ends) on the exhaust side look inviting. The Smokey Yunick method of the Y head scavenge may be an option as well.

Looking for your thoughts...


Art
Old 11-29-2005, 12:11 AM
  #2  
On The Tree
 
EdmontonSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I remember an article in GM High-Tech Performance magazine soon after the LS1 came out. I wont repeat the numbers that I remember from the article in case my memory is wrong... Hope this help you find what you're looking for, if no-one comes up with an answer for you, I may go through my back-issues.
Old 11-29-2005, 12:22 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
 
treyZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Dallas, North Mexico
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

they are traditionally cooled
Old 11-29-2005, 02:07 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
 
'JustDreamin''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD.
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think you missed the point of Art's question.

He stated that LS1's are traditional cooled, vs the reverse cooling of the previous engine design (the LT1). His question was: Has anybody converted an LS1 to reverse cooling, and if so, what did it do (power, cooling, whatever)?


If I remember right, reverse cooling was worth some power (not sure how much), but the headaches associated with it were too large (at least for the bean counters at GM responsible for paying for such headaches under warranty). Which would imply that there is power available in the LS1 by going to reverse cooling assuming you can keep the air purged out of the system (and any of the other potential problems).

Sadly, I don't remember where I read the statement about reverse cooling being worth power, or any kind of quantification of how much (2hp or 20hp). So, sadly, I can't answer Art's question at all.

'JustDreamin'
Old 11-29-2005, 02:19 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
 
treyZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Dallas, North Mexico
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I beleive it was an overlooked patent, not a warranty claim.
Old 11-29-2005, 02:40 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
 
gun5l1ng3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Are you saying someone else already had a patent on it, and that is why they stopped using it after the LT1?
Old 11-29-2005, 02:54 PM
  #7  
11 Second Club
 
jerflash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: long island, ny
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

the reason they went back to traditional is it was a bitch to bleed the cooling systems on those lt1s from what i understand
Old 11-29-2005, 04:18 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
 
gun5l1ng3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I actaully blew the head gaskets on my old 94 LT1 Camaro because I did not bleed it enough and it overheated in Laguna Beach, CA. I ended up spending my two week Christmas break changing the head gaskets on the that car
Old 11-29-2005, 07:39 PM
  #9  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Art_H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Thanks for the info.

The air pocket issue is quite a big concern. I'll try to look into the exact coolant passage shape in the heads, and find out where the peaks are to trap air,(would make things worse) if there are any at all.

One problem with the small block Chevy, and now I believe the LS*, is that with both heads flowing into a single port, then into a hose back to the rad, each head does not flow at the same time. This was something Smokey Yunick investigated. What happens is that as the coolant heats up and begins to flow, one side(head) will heat up faster ie. hotter, with more pressure. This greater pressure makes only the hotter side flow because of the greater pressure. Then, as the hotter side flows, it cools down enough, aqs the non flowing side heats up. There is then a transition of flow. In the end what happens is an alternating flow, resulting in an inefficient system, and hotter heads, and less compression.

What "Smokey" did was drill holes into the ends of the heads edging towards the exhuast side ( hottest ) . Tapped and installed piped fittings with hoses and a Y juction to a main rad return hose. This allowed the heads to flow more effiently(from the front of head) and to flow simultaneously, resulting in more stable head temps.

It would seem that the LS1 heads are ready made for this mod, with the casting plugs in the exact optimum area.

"Smokey Yunick" for those that don't know was yester years David Vizard in the racing/performance genre. He has many patents including the extended tip spark plugs we all enjoy. When I read something of his, I take it as gospel. Though some new technology and metalurgy has changed from his days. He tried to get GM to use a reverse flow setup for many years.

Your thoughts are appreciated...

Art
Old 11-29-2005, 11:37 PM
  #10  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve - Race Eng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oceanside, Ca.
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 123 Likes on 36 Posts

Default Reverse cooling

Evan's Cooling Systems holds the patent on reverse cooling. They have been in a dispute with GM for years over royalty payments they feel they are owed.




Originally Posted by gun5l1ng3r
Are you saying someone else already had a patent on it, and that is why they stopped using it after the LT1?
__________________
Steve Demirjian
Race Engine Development
Oceanside, Ca.
760-630-0450
web: www.raceenginedevelopment.com/
e-mail: race-engine-development@***.net
Old 11-30-2005, 02:20 AM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
buffman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kzoo, MI
Posts: 2,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jerflash
the reason they went back to traditional is it was a bitch to bleed the cooling systems on those lt1s from what i understand

I never have any problems bleeding my coolant system on my car. It can become a mess (coolant spraying all over the place when the air stops coming out) but purchasing a nifty little bleeder valve that I can attach a rubber hose to makes it all the easier.

Matt
Old 12-01-2005, 09:03 AM
  #12  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
redline2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Steve - Race Eng
Evan's Cooling Systems holds the patent on reverse cooling. They have been in a dispute with GM for years over royalty payments they feel they are owed.
Here is some info on that if anyone is interested.

http://www.evanscooling.com/evansvsgm/nytimes.htm
Old 12-01-2005, 09:34 AM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Camaroholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Waco, TX
Posts: 6,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Here's something for you to ponder. From the 1998 Pontiac Firebird sales brochure:
Attached Thumbnails LS1 Reverse Cooling-revflow.jpg  
Old 12-01-2005, 09:40 AM
  #14  
TECH Resident
 
'JustDreamin''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD.
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So, regardless of whether GM aquired trade secrets legally or not (which seems like it will be disputed for a couple more years), the original question still remains unanswered.

Does anybody have any information on whether the LSx series engines would benefit from reverse cooling? Anybody do any experimentation / research on this? Anything? I'm certainly interested in the outcome.

'JustDreamin'
Old 12-01-2005, 09:50 AM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Camaroholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Waco, TX
Posts: 6,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Joe Prince (surprised nobody has brought that up yet) did produce a reverse flow electric waterpump, slightly before the Meziere street waterpump came out. I am not sure how many units were built, but I saw pictures and dyno charts. Seems the gains on the dyno weren't too far off from the Mez units tho, at nearly twice the price ($800-$850 was his price target, IIRC).

Search for JPR EWP here, that's bound to dig up something.

Oh, and don't mention JPR in any new posts. His business failed miserably in a huge crapstorm.

Last edited by Camaroholic; 12-01-2005 at 09:56 AM.
Old 12-01-2005, 03:11 PM
  #16  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
redline2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JustDreamin
So, regardless of whether GM aquired trade secrets legally or not (which seems like it will be disputed for a couple more years), the original question still remains unanswered.

Does anybody have any information on whether the LSx series engines would benefit from reverse cooling? Anybody do any experimentation / research on this? Anything? I'm certainly interested in the outcome.

'JustDreamin'
Check this months Hi-tech and performance. One of the nitrous cars is reverse cooled
Old 12-01-2005, 03:47 PM
  #17  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
SS30ANV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very interesting article....thanks for posting.
Old 12-03-2005, 09:05 AM
  #18  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
TwoFast4Lv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: LT1 land...the "409" of the 90s!
Posts: 10,023
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

There is some power and reliability in reverse cooling. Any one even notice LTx cars had more base CR then LSx car?

I have never had a problem or issue bleeding a LT system
Old 12-03-2005, 07:23 PM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
rons 00z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: omaha, NE
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

so then since there is some sort of power gain how is this possible with our motors? do we use those plugs in the back of the head or what? i'm interested in all that could possible involved in this swap
Old 12-03-2005, 07:51 PM
  #20  
Launching!
 
bifster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: cobourg ON
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ok guys so you are saying that the LSx is traditional flow from block to heads?? I have been told prefusely that it is reverse heads to block please let me know .


Quick Reply: LS1 Reverse Cooling



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:02 AM.