Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

650 HP Chevrolet Colorado

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2016, 04:01 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
DoggyB22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts

Default 650 HP Chevrolet Colorado

What your opinion on GM throwing a LT4 in a Colorado to take on the Ford Raptor? Imo I love the new Colorado





Last edited by DoggyB22; 01-18-2016 at 03:55 PM.
Old 01-15-2016, 05:49 PM
  #2  
rwb
TECH Enthusiast
 
rwb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Kansas
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It will never happen. It would steal sales from other gm trucks.
Old 01-16-2016, 08:02 AM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
X-ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

That would be far too much power for the Colorado to put to the ground. The plans are for a Duramax.

http://www.caranddriver.com/news/che...-and-info-news

Under the ZR2’s hood is GM’s first U.S. installment of its 2.8-liter Duramax turbo-diesel four-cylinder, a global engine that will migrate to the Colorado for the 2016 model year. With urea injection, this big-bore four churns out 181 horsepower at 3400 rpm and a swelling 369 lb-ft of torque at 2000 rpm, a 23 lb-ft bump from overseas models. A balance shaft and a variable-geometry turbo may deliver some TDI-level refinement, but don’t expect GM’s smooth eight-speed automatic to jump on board. The Colorado lives for just six.

At the moment, the ZR2 is officially a concept, yet there’s every indication this trim will, in some form, make it to the production line. We look forward to pressing its buttons knowing this time around, they’ll probably last.
Old 01-22-2016, 04:55 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Z Fury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,595
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I'm all for more power in almost anything, but anything more than the new LT1 in the Colorado seems like overkill for the sake of overkill. I would throw money at GM for a Canyon powered by the 5.3 + 8 speed, but they won't even go that far...
Old 02-04-2016, 01:01 PM
  #5  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
loudblack97z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New Smyrna Beach
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hell I'd settle with the new 4.3 V6 instead of the 3.6 V6. I'd prefer the powerband and low end torque of the 4.3
Old 02-04-2016, 02:46 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

I like the idea of the Duramax in the Colorado.
Old 02-08-2016, 10:54 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Z Fury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,595
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by loudblack97z71
Hell I'd settle with the new 4.3 V6 instead of the 3.6 V6. I'd prefer the powerband and low end torque of the 4.3
I've given up on that request. The only truck engine this thing got was the 2.8 Duramax. I half expect the next generation Colorado/Canyon to be built on a Malibu frame...

Originally Posted by Rise of the Phoenix
I like the idea of the Duramax in the Colorado.
I love it. The diesel Canyon was very close to becoming my next vehicle, and I may still get one in the future. My target has shifted from truck/SUV to car though.
Old 02-09-2016, 08:59 AM
  #8  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
loudblack97z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New Smyrna Beach
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

True, I'm waiting to see how the 2.8 duramax proves itself. If the price makes sense I might swap my Sierra Denali 6.2 out for a Canyon for boat towing/hauling/road trip duties. It'd probably fit in my garage better and definitely get better mpg. The driving characteristics while towing a 21ft CC boat will be the deciding factor.
Old 02-10-2016, 10:29 AM
  #9  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
PCella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think they should just slap a VXRacing Turbo on it and call it the Denmah edition.
Old 02-10-2016, 10:36 AM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by loudblack97z71
True, I'm waiting to see how the 2.8 duramax proves itself. If the price makes sense I might swap my Sierra Denali 6.2 out for a Canyon for boat towing/hauling/road trip duties. It'd probably fit in my garage better and definitely get better mpg. The driving characteristics while towing a 21ft CC boat will be the deciding factor.
In terms of stock HP/TQ, how does the 2.8 Duramax stack up against the Cummins 3.0 EcoDiesel? I assume the 5.0 Cummins is significantly higher HP/TQ over the 2.8 Duramax and the 3.0 Cummins EcoDiesel.
Old 02-10-2016, 03:35 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
AronZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 1,678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by loudblack97z71
True, I'm waiting to see how the 2.8 duramax proves itself. If the price makes sense I might swap my Sierra Denali 6.2 out for a Canyon for boat towing/hauling/road trip duties. It'd probably fit in my garage better and definitely get better mpg. The driving characteristics while towing a 21ft CC boat will be the deciding factor.
I'd be skeptical of that type of truck having enough brakes and correct suspension setup to take the load. It might do work, but usually when you have little truck, big load, you get into all kinds of stability/handling issues, especially at 60+mph.
Old 02-11-2016, 03:17 PM
  #12  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
loudblack97z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New Smyrna Beach
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AronZ28
I'd be skeptical of that type of truck having enough brakes and correct suspension setup to take the load. It might do work, but usually when you have little truck, big load, you get into all kinds of stability/handling issues, especially at 60+mph.
Yeah, I'll probably do a tow test at the dealer like I once did with a Durango V6 8spd. My ex wife wanted one and the salesman was sure it'd tow my boat just fine. Long story short: it was downright dangerous on the highway. Needless to say I did not go home with a V6 Durango haha.

The boat/trailer load is about 5000 lbs loaded up and with the T-top it has a lot of aero drag. It has disc brakes on the trailer. My Sierra 6.2 does great pulling it, but who knows how the Colorado with 2.8 Duramax will do. These new "midsize" trucks really aren't that small or light anymore. I think it's well over 4k lbs rigged with a crew cab.



Quick Reply: 650 HP Chevrolet Colorado



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 AM.