Cadillac CTS-V 2004-2007 (Gen I) The Caddy with an Attitude...

Cam suggestions needed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-2016, 05:48 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
BJHardin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Cam suggestions needed

So to start, I did try a search and didn't find much info to help with what I'm looking for.
I bought an 05 cts-v a few months ago with a valve tick, and am pretty sure it's a lifter. So I already bought lifters, head gasket kit, and decided to put in some long tube headers at the same time. I'm starting to think the cam could be damaged if the lifter in question has rotated at the bottom and want to be prepared with what kind of cam to put in if I have to replace it.
I know I need Springs, pushrods and all that jazz, litterally just went through this last year when I did a major overhaul on my 02 LS1 Trans am.
What I want is recommendations on a cam that gives good power and good low end toque in these cars.
The cam I put in my TA is a 233/240 and 112 LSA. It sounds bad *** at idle, and runs like a scalded dog, but it has nothing below 2k rpm, and really is still sluggish under 3k, but above that it hauls.

The cts-v is heavier, but stock it feels playful with the power it has under 2k and up. Most of my driving is around town and the low rpm torque is fun in this car, and the TA is not as fun to drive anymore with its setup.
What cams have people had good experience with for the V that gives great torque over peak hp?
Old 01-12-2016, 09:55 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
itsslow98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,768
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Id call Brian tooley or another vendor and have them set you up. A cam on the smaller end is probably what you are looking for.
Old 01-13-2016, 05:54 AM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
NIKDSC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 2,600
Received 22 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

You did a search and in not one of those other cam thread you saw to give a cam expert/vedor a call like stated above!?! I call bs.....nice try though.

Old 01-13-2016, 07:30 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
bigti99a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

^ saw that **** coming lol. as stated cam vendors like tooley or martin will set you up nice.
Old 01-13-2016, 08:37 AM
  #5  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (13)
 
Brian Tooley Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

It's good that you know what you don't want. Many guys want a big cam until they actually own one.

We have some smaller cams in the 220-225 intake duration range that you should consider. We even have some low lift cams that allow you to run LS6 springs and stock pushrods.

We have dealers across the country who can set you up if you want to deal with someone local to you.

Brian
Old 01-13-2016, 09:20 AM
  #6  
Naf
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Naf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sandbox, Kuwait
Posts: 1,634
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Daily driver or weekend warrior?

Daily driver i would suggest ls9 cam with 1.85 rockers.

Weekend warrior gt11 cam

In either case they pull very good from down low and hold good till redline.

I used both, the ls9 in my tahoe and the gt11 in my caddy.

Idle quality is great with the ls9 and good with the gt11.
Old 01-13-2016, 10:54 AM
  #7  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (13)
 
Brian Tooley Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Naf
Daily driver i would suggest ls9 cam with 1.85 rockers.
The LS9 cam has a 42.5 IVC due to the ultra wide 121 LSA which is okay, but a cam with a earlier IVC is going to make more average torque.

The LS9 cam also has a much quicker opening ramp than what you'd think, we've seen this cam break Comp 918 and PAC 1211X springs with stock 1.7 rockers, 1.85 rockers would be more difficult to control.
Old 01-13-2016, 11:02 AM
  #8  
Naf
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Naf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sandbox, Kuwait
Posts: 1,634
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Brian Tooley
The LS9 cam has a 42.5 IVC due to the ultra wide 121 LSA which is okay, but a cam with a earlier IVC is going to make more average torque.

The LS9 cam also has a much quicker opening ramp than what you'd think, we've seen this cam break Comp 918 and PAC 1211X springs with stock 1.7 rockers, 1.85 rockers would be more difficult to control.
It worked great in my tahoe for pullin boats and gettin up to speeds of 80mph with great milage to boot
Old 01-13-2016, 11:08 AM
  #9  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (13)
 
Brian Tooley Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Naf
It worked great in my tahoe for pullin boats and gettin up to speeds of 80mph with great milage to boot
Check out the LS9 cam test results in this article, low end torque on the cam was down 40 lb/ft at 2500 rpm compared to the stock LM7 cam, this is on a 5.3 not a 5.7

You'll notice the aftermarket 224 cam made more power everywhere.

http://www.hotrod.com/how-to/engine/...st-comparison/
Old 01-13-2016, 11:09 AM
  #10  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (13)
 
Brian Tooley Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Another thing to note, if this is a LS6 engine the LS9 cam doesn't have the required camshaft position reluctor.
Old 01-13-2016, 11:14 AM
  #11  
Naf
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Naf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sandbox, Kuwait
Posts: 1,634
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

I know of this article, but all cams were tested with 1.7 rockers and not 1.8 with either the ls9 nor ls7 cams.

If you read up on their ls2 with ls3 heads cam shootout they switched the 1.7 for 1.8 rockers for more bottom end torque.
Old 01-13-2016, 11:15 AM
  #12  
Naf
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Naf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sandbox, Kuwait
Posts: 1,634
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Easily fixed with ls2 timin cover and cam sensor extension wire
Old 01-13-2016, 06:59 PM
  #13  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (2)
 
Martin Smallwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Mcleansville, NC
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

The LS9 cam is not what I would recommend either.

Something in the range of a 222/226 .603/.587 113+2 would be my recommendation for great low end torque, mid-range torque and still pull to 6500rpm. That would create a very wide torque minded power band for sure.
Old 01-13-2016, 09:41 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
itsslow98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,768
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Both Brian and Martin speced a cam in the range that I was expecting....Ive seen some TR224 cams in fbodies put a hurting on some big cammed cars.
Old 01-14-2016, 01:23 AM
  #15  
Naf
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Naf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sandbox, Kuwait
Posts: 1,634
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

As a user and i have tried mild to moderate cams. I found when the intake duration is below 220 the car idles and behaves closer to stock. Once you get over 220 idle quality drops and you have to be on your A game for the tune. Exhaust should be higher duration than intake and the wider the lsa the wider you power band is. With a heavy car its better to have a wider power band than a narrow one.

If it were me i would have a cam with 218/23x and a lsa of more than 116. Idle quality will be good and power also would be steady..

But thats me.

My caddy has 229/242 with a 114 lsa. It idles ok, but the power is mainly above 3500rpm. But everything on the top and bottom of the engine are nothing close to stock...
Old 01-14-2016, 03:43 AM
  #16  
Teching In
iTrader: (6)
 
gedupont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Cam Recommendations

[QUOTE=Naf;19110546]

..... If it were me i would have a cam with 218/23x and a lsa of more than 116. Idle quality will be good and power also would be steady....

How about an LS7 cam - 211/230; 121 LSA; lift of .591/.591 with 1.8 rockers or .571/.571 with the stock 1.7's?

George
TX
Old 01-14-2016, 04:59 AM
  #17  
Naf
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Naf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sandbox, Kuwait
Posts: 1,634
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

[quote=gedupont]
Originally Posted by Naf

..... If it were me i would have a cam with 218/23x and a lsa of more than 116. Idle quality will be good and power also would be steady....

How about an LS7 cam - 211/230; 121 LSA; lift of .591/.591 with 1.8 rockers or .571/.571 with the stock 1.7's?

George
TX
I already said that option but with 1.85 rockers and these guys pretty much blew me out of the water
Old 01-14-2016, 06:03 AM
  #18  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
BJHardin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NIKDSC5
You did a search and in not one of those other cam thread you saw to give a cam expert/vedor a call like stated above!?! I call bs.....nice try though.

No, I did see suggestions abbot talking to vendors. But I'm not looking for suggestions on who to call to buy it from, I'm looking for real experience from other V owners on what they enjoy driving and what they don't.
I talked to Martin when I got the cam in my Trans am, and while I don't think he described it wrong, it definitely preforms completely different than I expected and I jumped the gun going with a bigger cam than needed. That's what happens with inexperience though, I had wide eyes looking at peak power numbers not thinking about how it would perform overall. But I don't drive that car much, its more of a play toy so it's still fun. The V on the other hand is more of a DD, even though I don't actually driver it to work, I use it for around town commuting and long highway trips.
Old 01-14-2016, 07:50 AM
  #19  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (13)
 
jmilz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,688
Received 111 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

Your best option is this right here: http://www.guerragroup.com/#!camshaft-help/c1mq5

PatG is the best one for you to talk to. Tooley and AI are right up there too but PatG's MO suits what you're looking for.
Old 01-14-2016, 08:01 AM
  #20  
Naf
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Naf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sandbox, Kuwait
Posts: 1,634
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BJHardin
No, I did see suggestions abbot talking to vendors. But I'm not looking for suggestions on who to call to buy it from, I'm looking for real experience from other V owners on what they enjoy driving and what they don't.
I talked to Martin when I got the cam in my Trans am, and while I don't think he described it wrong, it definitely preforms completely different than I expected and I jumped the gun going with a bigger cam than needed. That's what happens with inexperience though, I had wide eyes looking at peak power numbers not thinking about how it would perform overall. But I don't drive that car much, its more of a play toy so it's still fun. The V on the other hand is more of a DD, even though I don't actually driver it to work, I use it for around town commuting and long highway trips.
Then go for the ls7/9 with 1.85 rockers and call it a day. Better milage and smoother power. Not to mention you can still show them you have a beast under the hood. Like i said i used it in my tahoe and even towed a boat with no issue.


Quick Reply: Cam suggestions needed



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 AM.