Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Turbo or supercharged 5.3?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-12-2007, 01:13 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
9540x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Turbo or supercharged 5.3?

I've been building my 5.3 for a couple of months now. Originally I was going to stroke it to 5.7, but have decided that I like the idea of boosting it much more. While I don't want this to turn into a debate between turbos and SC, I was just curious as to people's opinions for my specific application. If I were to go SC, I'm thinking Whipple or MagnaCharger not centrifugal. It's going into an 88 T/A which will serve as a mostly DD except for exceptionally snowy or rainy days.
Old 07-12-2007, 03:13 PM
  #2  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (5)
 
hpmotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: N.E. FL
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I my opinion TURBO
Old 07-12-2007, 05:02 PM
  #3  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
Wnts2Go10O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 4,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

d1sc, cheatr cam, hawks lt's, done
Old 07-12-2007, 08:29 PM
  #4  
sawzall wielding director
iTrader: (4)
 
G-Body's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Downers Grove, IL
Posts: 3,120
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

You don`t need to stroke a 5.3 to make it a 5.7. The stroke is the same, you just need to bore the 5.3L and put 5.7 pistons in it. I vote for the turbo, more work and expense, but more opportunity to make power
Old 07-12-2007, 09:58 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
9540x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cool G-body. You're right, I mistyped, the stroke on the 5.3 is the same. As far as turbo prices are concerned, it seems that the turbo plus piping will run me around 4500. A Whipple is around the same price as that and the MagnaCharger is about 5,000. Even with the IC added to the price of the turbo system, it seems that they should cost approximately the same. Am I wrong here?
Old 07-12-2007, 11:50 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
exodus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Forreston, IL
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by G-Body
You don`t need to stroke a 5.3 to make it a 5.7. The stroke is the same, you just need to bore the 5.3L and put 5.7 pistons in it. I vote for the turbo, more work and expense, but more opportunity to make power
agreed, also vote turbo due to the fact that you mentioned "daily driver"
Old 07-16-2007, 06:52 AM
  #7  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
shanekennedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 146
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

for the price of a turbo or SC, you may come out cheaper to sell the 5.3 & buy a used ls2
Old 07-16-2007, 07:59 AM
  #8  
cam
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: in the garage
Posts: 3,389
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

We're doing a TT 6.0 L now and as mentioned above from everything i have read it seems turbos make more power than anything else BUT...

My tuner has an F1R bolt on supercharger that put 885 rwhp down on stock cube 346 LS1 A4 and he just tuned a 6.0 L DISC that hit 785. Pretty sick numbers with a VERY reasonable cost and dick all fabrication ( comparitively speaking with respect to turbos )

Check out Bob at Exotic Performance Plus ( site sponsor ) not to mention in a third gen one of these set up would fit like cake. Good luck with the build!



Quick Reply: Turbo or supercharged 5.3?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 PM.