Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LS1-T56 or BUICK GN drivetrain into 69Z28

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-24-2008, 09:29 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Tommy69z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Muscle Shoals, AL
Posts: 162
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default LS1-T56 or BUICK GN drivetrain into 69Z28

Bought a GN setup a couple a years ago, thought it was what I wanted, but could not get motivated to swap it in. Found a deal on a wrecked 98 T/A I picked up yesterday. I was all hyped about putting it in my 69 Camaro, but now I am second guessing. The car had a LT1-T56 a year or so ago, but I was unhappy with it, the way I modded it, so I yanked it and sold it.
Old 07-24-2008, 09:35 AM
  #2  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
Old _School's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What are your intentions with the car? Why were you unhappy with the LT1, what mods did you do to it? Give us some more info and we will be able to help you out a little better with your decision.
Old 07-24-2008, 09:41 AM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Tommy69z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Muscle Shoals, AL
Posts: 162
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Tried to make it a fast street car, did not like the 4.56's. I want a quick street car, that is more cruiser friendly, gets good mileage. The LT1 sucked the gas down. I just went about it all wrong, so I sold out. I now have a set of 3.31's for the rear, was prepping for the Buick set up.
Old 07-24-2008, 09:54 AM
  #4  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Lickeyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The LT1 should have gotten still decent mileage even with the 4.56s with a t56 unless you were running lowrider wheels LOL What did a 69 z with a small block weigh like 3700? So high teens mpg on a modded lt1 should have been doable.

LS1 + t56 only marginally better economy.

Buick stuff is fairly more expensive IMO

How quick do you want the car is the real question? 10s, 11s, 12s?
Old 07-24-2008, 09:58 AM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Tommy69z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Muscle Shoals, AL
Posts: 162
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I just want a fun car to drive, gets good mileage, and can smoke most punks on the street(newer mustangs, and camaros) and maybe run in the high 7 sec 1/8 mile.
Old 07-24-2008, 10:00 AM
  #6  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Tommy69z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Muscle Shoals, AL
Posts: 162
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Also, I don't have deep pockets, so the words TIGHT BUDGET are a very important part. Hey 50 posts, now maybe I can post the 98 unwanted parts for sale!
Old 07-24-2008, 10:18 AM
  #7  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
SUPERBOOST's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

A 69 z with a stock ls1 and t56 with 331-355 gears should weigh 33-3400 lbs or less all according to your setup.Being conservitive it should get 25 mpg or better.A decent set of heads,cam, ls6 intake,caltracts and decent tires should get your high 7's.You can sell the buick setup for good money or keep it for another project.You can always add a small turbo or blower later if you ,or should I say when you get power hungry.Parts are readily availible for ls1 into first gen camaro.
Old 07-24-2008, 10:30 AM
  #8  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Lickeyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If you have a complete ls1 fbody I would go that route. You can get mounts, headers, and hoses even.

You really wouldn't have to do any fab work LOL
Old 07-24-2008, 11:12 AM
  #9  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Tommy69z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Muscle Shoals, AL
Posts: 162
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think I am going to give the LS1 a try, mainly because I have a complete car, and I can fab pretty much everything I need. I do have basically everything from the buick, as I had the car when I robbed it also. From my perspective, I will have to spend more on the buick setup, which LOW budget is what I am after.
Old 07-24-2008, 11:46 AM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
subtlez28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Janesville WI
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Best of both worlds:
LS1/T56....PLUS....TURBO (S)
Old 07-24-2008, 12:50 PM
  #11  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
fast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

the turbo V6 doesn't look right under the hood of a 1st gen

so the lt1 is already gone? mine always surprised me with good mpg, I'd have just gone to a more friendly gear

ls1/t56 +331s should do very nicely on mpg (4th gen ls1 t56 cars had 342s and got very good mpg)

good luck and enjoy your ride!
Old 07-24-2008, 01:14 PM
  #12  
TECH Resident
 
rockytopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Quote "can smoke most punks on the street(newer mustangs, and camaros)"

Good luck with that, feel lucky if you can just keep up with em. Read this forum, they know way more about these LS1's and how to make them run faster than most of us old school farts do. I just put a stock ls1 in my 65 A body and got 22 mpg in a box on the first tank even while guning it ever time I took off. Good luck I have zero regrets retiring the 455 and going LS1. The sweetest part of all is starting it. Just turn the key and it fires.
Old 07-24-2008, 03:33 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
bczee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 6,665
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Go with the Gen III/IV engine.. with a stocker LS1 / T56 and 4.10 gears.. I crank out 23+ at 75mph on the highway.. that is about 2k on the tach.... maybe with some tuning and a lighter right foot, I'd get better MPG'..

With a Gen III/IV engine, your going to upgrade to the best of everything.. and they respond very well to mod's and upgrades to make great power.

If you do most of the fab work yourself and electrical wiring. You can save a bunch of $$$ doing the swap. Cause it is not really much money to phyically swap in the engine and trans. It the little things that adds up and doing upgrades (AN fitting, SS braided hose, Billet and chrome, etc) that are not really needed. For a stock LS1, you an get by with many of the everyday equiepment, but just don't be cheap on what your really need to spend the funds on.
Old 07-25-2008, 06:02 PM
  #14  
On The Tree
 
ten5nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Stockett, Montana
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Don't think like that!!

Do you even need to question this option? LS1 6-speed all the way man!! Probably 20 miles to the gallon, plus 11's in the 1/4!! What more could you ask for?




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:52 AM.