Cam only with ported FAST 92
12-20-2008, 12:43 PM
#1
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Easley, SC
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cam only with ported FAST 92 Well, somebody had to try it. I'm pretty pleased with the gains considering the stock 853 heads. It basically lost nothing down low and gained up top. Props to Tony Mamo for the port work on the intake and big thanks to Craig and v8pwr for helping me get everything ready for the install.
Baseline:
TSP lid, stock descreened MAF, Jantzer ported TB, LS6 intake
Changes:
FTP 85mm lid, SLP 85mm MAF, NW 92mm TB, ported FAST 92mm intake
SAE numbers were 394/368 before and 404/373 after. The graph has a more extensive mod list. Keep in mind this is through a 9" and steel driveshaft.
Last but not least, big thanks to Mike Norris
He does awesome work and is a great guy. I highly recommend him.
Fullsize graph can be seen here
Baseline:
TSP lid, stock descreened MAF, Jantzer ported TB, LS6 intake
Changes:
FTP 85mm lid, SLP 85mm MAF, NW 92mm TB, ported FAST 92mm intake
SAE numbers were 394/368 before and 404/373 after. The graph has a more extensive mod list. Keep in mind this is through a 9" and steel driveshaft.
Last but not least, big thanks to Mike Norris
He does awesome work and is a great guy. I highly recommend him.Fullsize graph can be seen here
Last edited by SidewayzOZ; 12-20-2008 at 02:36 PM.
12-20-2008, 01:28 PM
#4
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Congratulations...
I agree with Damian...
It seems that most of the M6 LS1s with cam, headers, LS6/fast intake and basic bolt-ons are averaging 400 rwhp +/-.
Thanks for the info.
-Tim
I agree with Damian...
It seems that most of the M6 LS1s with cam, headers, LS6/fast intake and basic bolt-ons are averaging 400 rwhp +/-.
Thanks for the info.
-Tim
Last edited by lamar; 12-20-2008 at 01:32 PM. Reason: wanted to agree with above post.
12-20-2008, 02:38 PM
#7
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Easley, SC
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Word on the street is that he will drive 7 hours just to help a friend out 
I didn't really expect them to with stock heads. 10 rwhp was the most I expected to see, and of course the 853 heads are not scheduled to be in the final picture
Trending Topics
12-29-2008, 05:03 PM
#12
i would have expected more from a tony mamo ported fast, 85mm lid and 85mm maf swap...wonder what the 85mm setup gave by itself...
nice gains though, lets see what it will do with some heads...
nice gains though, lets see what it will do with some heads...
Last edited by chrs1313; 12-29-2008 at 05:09 PM.
12-29-2008, 11:07 PM
#16
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Easley, SC
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12-30-2008, 02:31 PM
#18
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Easley, SC
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is an older video but it still sounds the same (only difference now is an H pipe instead of an X).
http://www.camsurge.com/videos/viewvideo.php?id=4
http://www.camsurge.com/videos/viewvideo.php?id=4
12-30-2008, 07:01 PM
#19
12-30-2008, 08:39 PM
#20
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Northern WV just south of MD
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ouch, what am I not seeing. It looks like 1800$ of hardware and tune and you get 10HP all above 5800RPM. I would be careful turing 6800RPM on stock bottom end. Sorry if I missed something.