Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

New dyno numbers after head only swap ( PRC 2.5 )

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2009, 09:42 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
2slow4uss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default New dyno numbers after head only swap ( PRC 2.5 )

I just had the car back to the dyno to see what I gained from doing a head swap. The car made 370 whp with the current cam and bolt ons. Only changes were heads ( PRC 5.3 stg 2.5 ), 30 lbs injectors and swapped the rear rims to 17x11 with 315's. Peak was 410 hp and 380 tq. Pretty happy with the results, considering it's through the exhaust, heavy rims and still on the 98 pcm. Still has a bit left in the tune. Before and after dyno sheets to show the gain. Thanks again to Jon at Texas Speed!

98 camaro ... 6 speed
PRC 5.3 stg 2.5 ( milled to 59 cc )
MLS gasket
227/228 ( 649/598 ... 111 LSA )
hardened pushrods and dual springs
Lid / SB / PP TB / LS6 intake
30 lbs injectors
Coated long tubes / off road y / hooker catback
LS6 clutch
4:10 gears
EFIlive tuned

A/F was 12.9 all the way through the band and timing was about 26 deg.
Attached Thumbnails New dyno numbers after head only swap ( PRC 2.5 )-dyno-1.jpg   New dyno numbers after head only swap ( PRC 2.5 )-dyno-2.jpg  
Old 05-25-2009, 12:48 AM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
 
xfactor_pitbulls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nevada, TX
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Big boy lift on the intake side. Is that an LSK or XFI lobe? You guys scare me with that lift.
Old 05-25-2009, 01:17 AM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (35)
 
98camaroLS1M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Nice, lsk on intake side.
Old 05-25-2009, 10:03 AM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
 
blu1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Im confused, why did you lose 27rwhp from run 5 to run 6?
Old 05-25-2009, 11:47 AM
  #5  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
BrianC98Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Texarkana,TX
Posts: 954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

wow, 59cc on the heads. guess you could get away with that due to the low duration side or am I missing something.
Old 05-25-2009, 03:24 PM
  #6  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Nitroused383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Something isn't right... You only gained 14rwtq at peak. You should be around 11.4:1 compression, I would have expected more torque than that for gaining 1.4 points of compression. Not to mention the heads are ported, I think you would have been better off with a set of stock 243's. Actually the whole torque curve looks low, it takes until 3500rpm to make 350rwtq.

Last edited by Nitroused383; 05-25-2009 at 03:32 PM.
Old 05-25-2009, 11:00 PM
  #7  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
2slow4uss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The low run was in 3rd while the others were in 4th. I didn't get the torque I was looking for, but the tune isn't 100% yet either. After looking at my logs I was getting up to 3.5 deg of KR taking my timing down to 22 deg at some points... Still got some tuning to do...
Old 05-26-2009, 11:56 AM
  #8  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jason 98 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Actually he's saying the car made basically 370 before & 410 after the heads install. That's 40rwhp with a tune that is pulling timing way bellow ideal.

Good work bro, keep messing with that thing & I think you'll be able to line out the tune no problem.

Originally Posted by Nitroused383
Something isn't right... You only gained 14rwtq at peak. You should be around 11.4:1 compression, I would have expected more torque than that for gaining 1.4 points of compression. Not to mention the heads are ported, I think you would have been better off with a set of stock 243's. Actually the whole torque curve looks low, it takes until 3500rpm to make 350rwtq.
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Old 06-01-2009, 10:42 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
2001ws6-500hp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: ohio
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i got the same heads and they same cam. tourquer v.3 if im correct. im hopin to put down better numbers than these.
Old 06-02-2009, 09:09 AM
  #10  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 5,053
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Nitroused383
Something isn't right... You only gained 14rwtq at peak. You should be around 11.4:1 compression, I would have expected more torque than that for gaining 1.4 points of compression. Not to mention the heads are ported, I think you would have been better off with a set of stock 243's. Actually the whole torque curve looks low, it takes until 3500rpm to make 350rwtq.
Maybe you missed where on the before graphs it didn't make 350ftlbs until 3500rpm (or a little later)?

To the OP: Don't worry about the haters. It's nothing personal against you, they're only in your thread because they dislike TSP. Those are respectable gains from just a head swap (and heavier wheels).
__________________


Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!

COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
Old 06-02-2009, 09:45 AM
  #11  
Teching In
iTrader: (3)
 
Aaron1017's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Pretty much what I dynod as well:


Not super great, but good enough for a set of used budget heads.

My Specs:
* LS1 Block
* T-56 Transmission
* TSP PRC 5.3L Stage 2.5 Heads (non-milled)
* TSP Torquer v2 Cam 112 LSA
* Cometic .040" Head gasket
* MSD 8.5mm wires and protective boots
* Ported Throttle Body
* 25% Udnerdrive Pulley
* JTR/Sanderson 1 7/8th Long Tube Headers
* LS6 Intake Manifold
* TSP 7.400 Pushrods
* LS7 Lifters
* LS2 Lifter Trays
* LS6 Oil Pump
* NGK TR55 plugs
* 4.10 Torsen Rear End
* Aluminum Driveshaft
* Exhaust: catless custom true dual 3" piping through Magnaflow X-pipe and 5" straight through Magnaflow mufflers

Last edited by Aaron1017; 06-03-2009 at 10:16 AM.
Old 06-02-2009, 10:02 AM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
 
blu1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Matt@Texas-Speed
Maybe you missed where on the before graphs it didn't make 350ftlbs until 3500rpm (or a little later)?

To the OP: Don't worry about the haters. It's nothing personal against you, they're only in your thread because they dislike TSP. Those are respectable gains from just a head swap (and heavier wheels).
Looks like it didn't make 350rwtq until a little later on the after as well? Where is that advertised low end from smaller chambers at? These are 59cc as well with a heck of a lot more compression.
Old 06-02-2009, 02:10 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Abdullah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,453
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2slow4uss
I just had the car back to the dyno to see what I gained from doing a head swap. The car made 370 whp with the current cam and bolt ons. Only changes were heads ( PRC 5.3 stg 2.5 ), 30 lbs injectors and swapped the rear rims to 17x11 with 315's. Peak was 410 hp and 380 tq. Pretty happy with the results, considering it's through the exhaust, heavy rims and still on the 98 pcm. Still has a bit left in the tune. Before and after dyno sheets to show the gain. Thanks again to Jon at Texas Speed!

98 camaro ... 6 speed
PRC 5.3 stg 2.5 ( milled to 59 cc )
MLS gasket
227/228 ( 649/598 ... 111 LSA )
hardened pushrods and dual springs
Lid / SB / PP TB / LS6 intake
30 lbs injectors
Coated long tubes / off road y / hooker catback
LS6 clutch
4:10 gears
EFIlive tuned

A/F was 12.9 all the way through the band and timing was about 26 deg.
good numbers considering you have LS6 intake. you would gain another around 20rwhp with a ported Fast 92mm opened up to 96mm and a 96mm throttle body.

Last edited by Abdullah; 06-02-2009 at 02:35 PM.
Old 06-02-2009, 02:59 PM
  #14  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
PewterScreaminMach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Looks like your peak hp holds out pretty strong up top, good for high RPM racing.

And we make almost the exact same numbers: 408/380 here with a 224/228 581/588 113 LSA and $900/pair Patriot heads, although mine is through a very heavy drivetrain and same steep gearing (12-bolt, 4.10s, MN12 trans, 3.5" driveshaft, also 17" wheels).
Old 06-02-2009, 09:27 PM
  #15  
Restricted User
 
willyfastz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Matt@Texas-Speed
Maybe you missed where on the before graphs it didn't make 350ftlbs until 3500rpm (or a little later)?

To the OP: Don't worry about the haters. It's nothing personal against you, they're only in your thread because they dislike TSP. Those are respectable gains from just a head swap (and heavier wheels).
Matt, why must you call every person that questions a TSP package a "hater"?

I would love to see those two graphs overlayed, it doesn't really look like it picked up much at all down low. Matter fact just from comparing the graphs side by side it looks like the news heads only start pulling hard at or just above 4500rpm.

Last edited by willyfastz; 06-02-2009 at 09:45 PM.
Old 06-02-2009, 09:54 PM
  #16  
Banned
iTrader: (8)
 
Super Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: 'Merica
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by willyfastz
Matt, why must you call every person that questions a TSP package a "hater"?

I would love to see those two graphs overlayed, it doesn't really look like it picked up much at all down low. Matter fact just from comparing the graphs side by side it looks like the news heads only start pulling hard at or just above 4500rpm.
It's pretty obvious that the heads did work, people are hating for no valid reason, I could see if there were no gains but there obviously were, and people are still complaining, aka HATING
Old 06-02-2009, 10:06 PM
  #17  
Restricted User
 
willyfastz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Super Speed
It's pretty obvious that the heads did work, people are hating for no valid reason, I could see if there were no gains but there obviously were, and people are still complaining, aka HATING
Like I said, I would love to see the graphs over layed. Most head swap only deals pick up from start to finish. Yeah the heads picked up power but why only from 4500 rpm up?
Old 06-02-2009, 10:07 PM
  #18  
On The Tree
iTrader: (13)
 
LS1powered09's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DFW TX
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

good numbers
Old 06-02-2009, 10:32 PM
  #19  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
2slow4uss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Overall I am happy with the results. I didn't expect to swap a pair of "budget" heads, add heavier wheels and pick up 70-80 rwhp... Their site claimed 50 rwhp over stock and I picked up 40 whp with a heavier tire through 4:10's. Again, the tune is by no means 100% and the cam isn't the most aggressive. With a ported fast 90/90 set up, UD pulley and duals, I could see 435-450 whp, which would be right in line with this set up.
Old 06-03-2009, 04:00 AM
  #20  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Nitroused383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Matt@Texas-Speed
Maybe you missed where on the before graphs it didn't make 350ftlbs until 3500rpm (or a little later)?

To the OP: Don't worry about the haters. It's nothing personal against you, they're only in your thread because they dislike TSP. Those are respectable gains from just a head swap (and heavier wheels).
I never said I hated TSP. If you think questions why going from 10.2:1 compression to 11.4:1 only picked up 14ft lbs of torque is hating than I guess so. You had a nice hp gain no doubt, just wondered where the torque was. Maybe I do not always go along with the flow, but that is far from hating.


Quick Reply: New dyno numbers after head only swap ( PRC 2.5 )



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:44 PM.