Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

High Mile guys come in....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-13-2011, 05:08 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
JeaneGrae's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default High Mile guys come in....

Got my car retuned. Car makes 321.12 hp at about 5250 rpm and 324.49 peak tq from 4100 to about 5100rpm. Steady climb until then. Car seem s a little lower than most A4s, granted the ones i compared them to have udp and ls6 intake with 3.23 gears and no stall. Tq is about 15-20 lower than what i saw. Car has 149k miles, with routine maintenance done on time or early. Thoughts???
Old 09-13-2011, 05:29 PM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

you're good. take it to the track. if it traps less than 108 i'd be concerned.
Old 09-13-2011, 05:45 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
ryanzcastro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Long Beach CA
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

interesting, Its great to see a hi mileage LS1 still making decent numbers
Old 09-14-2011, 03:05 AM
  #4  
Launching!
 
Canbarelygo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Shawnee, OK
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

mine with the ls1 intake and 2.73s with just ebay headers headers and stock 5.3 heads made 331/340 on a 100 degree day. it made the same horsepower with a 3.73 and an ls6 intake tuned for the bottle on a 110 degree day my car has 193k miles on the bone stock bottom end and it still runs perfectly. at the power it made its best mph was 109 wheelhopping with a 2.0 60ft because i couldnt be bothered to take the 18in wheels and street tires off lol
Old 09-14-2011, 10:14 AM
  #5  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
ryanzcastro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Long Beach CA
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Canbarelygo
mine with the ls1 intake and 2.73s with just ebay headers headers and stock 5.3 heads made 331/340 on a 100 degree day. it made the same horsepower with a 3.73 and an ls6 intake tuned for the bottle on a 110 degree day my car has 193k miles on the bone stock bottom end and it still runs perfectly. at the power it made its best mph was 109 wheelhopping with a 2.0 60ft because i couldnt be bothered to take the 18in wheels and street tires off lol
Why did it make the same power with the ls6 intake? shouldnt you have made more?
Old 09-14-2011, 10:42 AM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

the 110 degree day and timing pulled would be my guess.
Old 09-14-2011, 01:02 PM
  #7  
Launching!
 
Canbarelygo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Shawnee, OK
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

it was 110 degrees out the dyno room was almost unbearabley hot and we pulled timing and i have a theory about 3.73s dyno'ing less but im not gonna go claiming that till i see some proof. but it made the same power but its way more pissed off in the mid to top end on the bottle we stuck 100 pills in it and where we shut the pull down due to know window switch it made 96 (i think) rwhp more at peak and under peak in the mid range are it picked up 105-115 in some areas the extra compression from the 5.3 heads are very noticeable lol. we didnt get a torque reading due to some screwy sensor's but i dont see why it wouldnt have picked up 130 rwtq.

but yes kinglt-1 is correct i had a few things working against me getting tuned for the bottle that day but it runs hard on the street on motor i assure you lol but its got 193k miles on this ole wore out first car and its one of the faster cars in my area still. im excited to see how itll do when it finally get a cam and stall i figure itll go 125mph or so on the little pills
Old 09-15-2011, 02:51 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
nnag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brighton, CO
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by s346k
you're good. take it to the track. if it traps less than 108 i'd be concerned.
of course it will trap less than 108, we are mile high here, racing at 8000da lol. I would guess you would trap around 100 or 102 here

Last edited by nnag; 09-15-2011 at 03:27 PM.
Old 09-15-2011, 03:14 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
stumprrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

nothing wrong with those numbers at all. my old ls1 had 105,000 miles and made 348 WHP cam only. it also ran consistant 11.90s @ 114-115 mph at around 3460 race weight. in other words, go rip!
Old 09-15-2011, 03:32 PM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (40)
 
00pooterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,916
Received 523 Likes on 372 Posts

Default

Was the converter unlocked? If so all references to non stalled auto's are out the door. I believe though that you were acknowledging that in your original post anyway.
Old 09-18-2011, 03:07 PM
  #11  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
TA6spdRDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sherwood AR
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Stout car for the miles!
Old 09-21-2011, 02:01 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
JeaneGrae's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default ....

Converter was locked for all three pulls. I had just came off the highway from a solid 2 hr drive, not sure how much the excess heat would affect the outcome. I gave her a brief cool dwon, but it didnt help too much. Tuner said it could be a little low due to mileage on the valve springs.
Old 09-21-2011, 02:25 PM
  #13  
Staging Lane
 
donati98ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i will hit 250k by the end of the week. i run the dog **** outta her.
Old 09-22-2011, 12:40 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
c0ncEpT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Shelby twp, MI
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Pretty standard I would say.

My car made 319 with Full exhaust and a lid on a Dynojet.

Locking the converter bridges the gap in dyno numbers when comparing a factory converter to an aftermarket.

Only difference that will effect power output is an aftermarket 9.5" will be lighter than a factory converter

Last edited by c0ncEpT; 09-22-2011 at 12:49 PM.
Old 09-22-2011, 01:28 PM
  #15  
Teching In
iTrader: (4)
 
Lxtasy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have 135XXX on mine and laid down 341hp with 343tq with just LS6 intake, long tubes, full exhaust and lid. My car has been on the dyno approx 10 times before me and has had the **** sprayed out of it prior to me owning it.I have a Harris Speed Works set up for it now but will probably just sell it.I am looking to get 500 on motor.

Thanks,
Chris
Old 09-22-2011, 02:32 PM
  #16  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (37)
 
therealcreeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,398
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

lid, ported throttle body, longtubes, ory, catback, and tuned (back when I was auto) made 340rwhp/355rwtq uncorrected (about 330/345 corrected) with 90k miles
Old 09-23-2011, 12:35 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
JeaneGrae's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default converter

How much of a difference does the 9.5 in converter make? thats what i'm running. Would that be + or - on the output numbers?
Old 09-27-2011, 05:06 PM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
LS1WS6dreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

When I got mine dyno'd (m6) I did 318 and 335tq. That was before LT's though. At the time it had around 160,xxx miles on it. I still need to get a tune and then I can get some new numbers.

Every GM 5.7 I have ever owned has had a bulletproof motor in it. On top of that they were all high mileage. L98 in a 91 GTA that had like 190,xxx miles on it. Ran great, good oil pressure everything. Also had an old RS with a 5.0 that ran great. Buddy had an LT1 with 180,xxx on it ran fine. My dad used to have a Vortec 5.7 in a Z71 with high mileage ran great. What i've seen more than anything is the auto transmissions going out. Kinda what made me get a M6 this go around. Sometimes I wish I had an auto, but a LS1 with a standard isn't like having a truck with one. You really don't shift that much in comparison.
Old 09-27-2011, 08:29 PM
  #19  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Mike@Diablosport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,289
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I think those numbers are right on...

190K+ on mine.
Took it to the track a few months ago, ran some traction limited 13.20's at 107. Hot as *****. First time ever with the car on street tires (non DR's).

LS6 intake, Mac mid lengths, stock catback...
Old 09-27-2011, 10:01 PM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
massls1guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mass
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think today I'm at ~199,600. Should pass 200k in less than a week. Runs good but earned 'most exhaust smoke on the dyno' last time I went. Normal driving I don't notice smoke. Probably past due for rings.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 AM.