StangBanger317

228R
799's
LS6

Not bad..

Johnnystock

iTrader: (6)

pretty good considering the 9inch/4.30s

StangBanger317

This was on the stock 10 bolt and 4.10's. Actually blew up the 10 bolt on the last dyno pull than pulled it for the Moser 9''

30th t/a

iTrader: (51)

Most people go by SAE numbers. What are your sae numbers?

clonedws6

iTrader: (6)

Not bad Tyler! Car is sex on wheels

StangBanger317

Didn't get SAE #'s this was just a baseline before the changes. Getting ready for ported 317's a 232/238 and FAST 92/92. Than a new shortblock..

zippy

Nice numbers for a mild setup. I would have guessed for a bit more torque, but decent overall. Probably a very nice daily driver. Power band is similar to that of a stock LS6 except with quite a bit more hp and torque. I'm not sure I'd ditch the 799's for 317's though even being ported. I'd take the compression over the 317's unless they really flow a huge amount more.

jmargo

iTrader: (10)

Good numbers....what LSA and octane ?

StangBanger317

112 LSA on 93 octane

StangBanger317

They are ported and milled so they shouldn't loose terrible compression and the lower comp. will be good for my winter build. 403 procharged

StangBanger317

Getting excited for the new h/c combo and some new #'s!!