Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

408 LS3 top end Dyno results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-2013, 02:37 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default 408 LS3 top end Dyno results

I have a 2002 camaro m6 stock rear with a 408:

408CID
forged bottom end with wiesco flat tops 3cc valve relifes
10.5:1 compression
EPS 236/242 .629/.629 114+2 LSA
L92 heads with minor port/polish work
LS3 intake (stock)
92mm TB
85mm MAF
SLP flo pack (soon to add an SSRA)
TSP 1 7/8" headers with 3" true duals

On a mustang dyno i made 440whp and 420 wtq


I also took it to the track, and on a 100 degree day ran 12.63 at 117.5.
Old 07-23-2013, 03:02 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Are you planning on adding a turbo/supercharger in the future? Reason I ask is because I see you went with 10:5.1 compression. If not, you're leaving quite a bit of power on the table.
Old 07-23-2013, 03:40 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
topendrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Statesville,Nc
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

mustang dyno or not that is not good. something is wrong.
Old 07-23-2013, 04:03 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
jleews6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: roanoke virginia
Posts: 1,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The dyno looks good but the real numbers (mph) dont seem right. My ws6 went 114 with just a lid,filter and mac headers through the stock cat back. I would go back to the track and work on the mphI would think you car should be able to run in the low 120s at full weight.
Old 07-23-2013, 05:08 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Rise of the Phoenix
Are you planning on adding a turbo/supercharger in the future? Reason I ask is because I see you went with 10:5.1 compression. If not, you're leaving quite a bit of power on the table.
I was worried about piston to valve clearance, thats why its relatively low for NA. I have the motor out and its gonna get bumped up closer to 11:1.
Originally Posted by jleews6
The dyno looks good but the real numbers (mph) dont seem right. My ws6 went 114 with just a lid,filter and mac headers through the stock cat back. I would go back to the track and work on the mphI would think you car should be able to run in the low 120s at full weight.
I agree, i expected to see the low ET cause it couldnt hook at all, and would even lose traction in the 1->2 shift some times. But i think i should be able to get 125 out of it. Im gonna go back on a cooler day and see what i can do.
Old 07-23-2013, 05:09 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The tuner said that if i change the intake so i make power up higher, and put a rear in it with some better gears i could potentially see 10's. My buddy has a C5 vette and he dynoed 420 on the same dyno and he runs 11.1 at 123
Old 07-23-2013, 05:20 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I just found out my compression was actually at 10.3, i miss calculated. i think im gonna take it up to 11.5:1 and retune.
Old 07-23-2013, 05:33 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
 
weldermike27408's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 188
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KingPin1094
I just found out my compression was actually at 10.3, i miss calculated. i think im gonna take it up to 11.5:1 and retune.
good luck and keep us posted
Old 07-23-2013, 05:41 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by weldermike27408
good luck and keep us posted
Does anyone know what kind of gain that will get me?
Old 07-23-2013, 07:20 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

I read somewhere that a full point increase in compression will give around a 3-5% gain. Not sure how true it is...
Old 07-24-2013, 06:06 AM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I just calculated my DC at 10.3 static compression, and based on my calculations my dynamic compression is at 9:1. From what i understand thats already a bit high. So if i raise my static compression to 11.5:1 then that would only raise my DC higher closer to 10:1 which may cause detonation and the tuner will have to pull timing for it to run right. Any thoughts on this?
Old 07-24-2013, 08:00 AM
  #12  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (24)
 
quik01ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If I were you go back to a cathedral port head and bigger cam I made around this power with my 347ci. IMO I just don't like a ls3 style head on a 408 or smaller but if u were to boost this it'd be fine if you're trying to do something n/a I'd go another route.
Old 07-24-2013, 10:43 PM
  #13  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnnystock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,675
Received 38 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Plp are making 450-475rwhp all day with cam only ls3. Something is wrong. What is the weight of your car? My LS2 Camaro has a smaller cam but will make 450rwhp.

Go back on a better day and maybe it will be better...
Old 07-24-2013, 11:29 PM
  #14  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Silver408z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Did you change the valves in the heads? I know the square port heads fit on a 4.030 bore but seems like I read there really wasn't enough room and caused valve shrouding. The shrouding hurts the air flow into the cylinder. That's why some of the companies make small bore ls3 heads.

Also are you sure you have a 92mm TB? Isn't the GM factory intakes 90mm? If you have a 92mm TB then your air flow into the intake could be messed up.
Old 07-25-2013, 12:28 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by quik01ss
If I were you go back to a cathedral port head and bigger cam I made around this power with my 347ci. IMO I just don't like a ls3 style head on a 408 or smaller but if u were to boost this it'd be fine if you're trying to do something n/a I'd go another route.
I was thinking of switching back, but i really dont have the money to switch to cathedral right now.

Originally Posted by Silver408z
Did you change the valves in the heads? I know the square port heads fit on a 4.030 bore but seems like I read there really wasn't enough room and caused valve shrouding. The shrouding hurts the air flow into the cylinder. That's why some of the companies make small bore ls3 heads.

Also are you sure you have a 92mm TB? Isn't the GM factory intakes 90mm? If you have a 92mm TB then your air flow into the intake could be messed up.
No i didnt have the valves changed. Pretty sure. I dont know what brand but its cable driven. And the intake opening is larger than the throttle body.
Old 07-25-2013, 02:55 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
moeZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: ashland, ky
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I made 446/405 w/ a 6.0L LQ9, L92 heads milled .020" (10.7:1) and a G5X3 112...
Old 07-25-2013, 02:59 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

I think you'd see a big increase with some TFS 235cc heads and a matching cam/intake.
Old 07-25-2013, 04:05 PM
  #18  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
topendrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Statesville,Nc
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i made 465/432 with stock bottom lq4 at 10.5 comp, 230/238, stock ls3 heads, stock l92 intake, 1 7/8 lt, 92 tb, 6spd w/ 4.10s. this was on a dynojet but should be right with you on a md. I think your cam is installed wrong or the tune is off. Something is deff wrong but its not the heads/intake. Im only on a 4.0 bore so your 4.030 is also not the problem.
Old 07-25-2013, 06:07 PM
  #19  
FormerVendor
 
James@ShorTuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Dyno Tuning in KY
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nearly an identical combo made THE exact same HP AND TQ on my Dyno Dynamics. I don't recommend those heads on anything smaller than a LS3 bore.
Old 07-26-2013, 11:10 AM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
stumprrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Whats the raceweight? 117.5 @ 440 WHP would make me think 3600+. My last car has a 430 RWHP 6.0 with 3.42 gears and couldnt budge 116. Car was almost 3800 pounds.


Quick Reply: 408 LS3 top end Dyno results



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21 AM.