Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

My Numbers High???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-20-2006, 03:23 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
JacobK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Joliet, IL
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default My Numbers High???

Ive been thinking about this for a while guys..I feel like my numbers are TOO high for my mods..Heres my mod list.

Pacesetter Longtubes and ORY
3" FlowTech Cutout which was closed
Borla Exhaust which had NO plate in it
Built 6 speed
Whisper Lid
SLP Ram Air
ASP Underdrive Pulley
EGR Delete
233/239 .595/.605 on a 112LSA custom ground cam.

This is on a 125K mile motor..and im on stock gears too..and it put down 409rwhp and 364rwtq on a Mustang Dyno..Doesnt that seem like a lot for a stock intake, stock unported heads, and a stock TB?
Old 09-20-2006, 03:42 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (42)
 
Brian2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tomball/Nacogdoches TX
Posts: 5,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hey i wouldn't complain about it
Old 09-20-2006, 03:49 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
98Z28MASS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,964
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

it does seem high...I have the same cam except with way more lift, plus an ls6 intake and a ported TB and only made 370 rwhp. Granted the 98 heads flow the worst of all the years the 99's arent that much better so maybe those wer uncorrected numbers? Either way its more how the car feels and runs at the track than dyno numbers IMO.
Old 09-20-2006, 04:00 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (33)
 
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

doesnt seem high to me, mustang dynos vary so much, but my buddy made 430/393 cam only with 120k miles on the motor
Old 09-20-2006, 04:12 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
JacobK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Joliet, IL
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

oh trust me im not complaining..its just when people ask what it puts out and i say, alot of people look at me like im crazy...I havent taken it to the track yet, so i dont know how she runs..we will see soon enough though
Old 09-20-2006, 04:22 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
8banger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago - Southside
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think it's high for only having an LS1 intake...who knows though. What else is strange is the split between hp and torque.
Old 09-20-2006, 04:34 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
JacobK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Joliet, IL
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

WS6FirebirdTA00, said his buddies was 430 and 393..why is it weird its split?
Old 09-20-2006, 04:42 PM
  #8  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
mike c.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mi
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

go to the track and see. i use a mustang dyno and on one of my first setups i had speed inc st2 heads,224/228 cam,asp pulley,ls6 intake,mac headers w/offroads,,m6 w/12bolt and 4.11's. i made 370hp & 355tq. my car ran 11.7's @ 116-117 at that time. on a dynojet with the same set up i made 395hp 380tq. your #'s seem way off for a mustang dyno. go to the track w/some good tires and tell us how it does,then you'll know if your #'s are on or the dyno your on gives out high #'s. now on the same dyno i make 463hp 414tq and run 10's.
Old 09-20-2006, 04:47 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
JacobK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Joliet, IL
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

well the track isnt going to be great for me, since ive never ran it at the track so i think my times are going to be a little off..
Old 09-20-2006, 08:05 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Your MPH will give you an idea how much hp. ET is not the indicator. Just try to get out of the hole clean and don't miss any shifts.
Old 09-20-2006, 09:48 PM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
 
AaronR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Those numberswould be exceptional on a dyno jet,you could just have a freak!
Old 09-20-2006, 10:55 PM
  #12  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
nahasapeemapetalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Grand Forks, North Dakota
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default high maybe..?

Seems high to me for those mods, i just dynoed mine tonight and i have ported ls6 heads ls6 intake..well look at sig

dynoed 403/386 on a dynojet
i hear the mustangs run higher typically?
i trap 113 in the quarter

nice work
Old 09-21-2006, 12:09 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
JacobK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Joliet, IL
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i thought dynojets dyno higher then mustang dynos?
Old 09-21-2006, 12:17 AM
  #14  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
02 Camaro SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rockland County, NY
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That's not too crazy. Definitely on the higher end for the mods you have, especially with the LS1 intake. With a 228/222 114LSA I made 400.1 RWHP 368 RWTQ on a Mustang dyno through a 12 bolt with 4.11s. I guess you got a good tune. Take it to the track and see how it does.
Old 09-21-2006, 01:03 AM
  #15  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (118)
 
Havok2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: RGV texas
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

dynojets dyno higher than mustang dynos
Old 09-22-2006, 05:23 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
1FST99Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Orlando,FL
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

man, it must really suck to have those problems. I wish I had problems of making more power than I am supposed too.
Old 09-22-2006, 09:07 PM
  #17  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
mike c.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mi
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

dyno jets are HIGHER. like i said dynojet 395hp mustang dyno no mod changes 370hp.than, i was trapping 116mph,new set up i trap just over 125mph on motor.
Old 09-24-2006, 10:54 PM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (21)
 
Jefro6996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Macomb, MI
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I put down 420/380 on the mustang dyno and consistently trap 118-119 and have had a couple runs in the 120's with an m6 and stock 3.42 gears
Old 09-25-2006, 12:04 AM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
 
streetwarrior96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I would think that the HP and TQ would be a bit closer being a 6 speed, but ya never know
Old 09-25-2006, 11:23 AM
  #20  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (39)
 
BADSZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NW Chicago Subs
Posts: 3,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The stock gear and rear are going to give you higher numbers. Mine just did 389/374 on a mustang dyno with 4.56 gears, locker and 9". They said that would net over 420 with stock rear and gears. I have float so I think 400 will be possible after some shimming.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:55 PM.