ramairetransam

iTrader: (18)

if i recall the sdce uses a different ati balancer than the procharger ati blancer

Does anyone know why , im thinking about going from the sdce to the aster and dont want to get the sdce off and aster on and run into problems.


so who has made the switch

Ws6Dnero

iTrader: (23)

It uses the same balancer. The SDCE uses a different crank pulley though.

ramairetransam

iTrader: (18)

i have found conflicting numbers i know for a fact the one for the procharger or aster one is 918853 . thats on brute speeds site

the one or two places i thought i saw on here show pn 917264

both are listed for f bodies .

Bob@BruteSpeed

iTrader: (16)

The 918853 balancer has the holes drilled through the outer skin, for the three bolts to fasten the crank pulley to the balancer. Most of the other ATI Performance Products harmonic balancers do not have these holes drill through the outer skin. The hub has the threaded holes in these other balancers, and it isn't hard to drill the outer skin for the three holes should your balancer not have the holes. Bob

ramairetransam

iTrader: (18)

hmm ,im gonna have to get under the car or find a pic or both types to see what you mean .

ramairetransam

iTrader: (18)

What outer skin bob. My sdce crank pulley bolts to the ati balancer with 3 bolts also

Bob@BruteSpeed

iTrader: (16)

Many of the balancers don't have the the extra bolt holes that are shown in the above 918853 balancer. Bob

ThrelkeldsZ

How much would you want for the SDCE set up?

ramairetransam

iTrader: (18)

i just got my invoice for two years ago from sd concepts and they did use a 918853 so it looks like i dont have to buy one of them . So at some point bob i will order an aster bracket and waterpump . Im looking for a used cbr pulley and 3.8 right now . otherwise ill get them from you .

Bob@BruteSpeed

iTrader: (16)

Good to see. Sounds good, thanks! Bob