Ported 241's question
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ported 241's question
I have a set of ported 241s they have ls6 valves 2.0 1.55 valves 65cc chamber. Here are flow numbers. Are these good flow numbers. Also was thinking bout Brian Tooley stage 2 cam. What u guys think. It's a street car. Has tsp long tubes and catted y pipe.
Intake exhaust
200. 144. 113.7
300. 207. 167.5
400. 258. 202
500. 276. 215
550 279. 221
600. 282. 222
Intake exhaust
200. 144. 113.7
300. 207. 167.5
400. 258. 202
500. 276. 215
550 279. 221
600. 282. 222
#2
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,836 Likes
on
1,145 Posts
Your heads flow VERY similar to mine. My cam in signature is close to the BTR S2. I sort of wish I had a tighter LSA, but overall, I'm happy with the cam. it really wakes up at 3K rpm. sometimes, it feels a bit delayed at the low end, but that could easily be tune.
If you don't have that notch in the head, you might want to go MLS 0.041" gaskets to get a bump in compression. That would leave you .035" quench. That's how I'm set up.
If you don't have that notch in the head, you might want to go MLS 0.041" gaskets to get a bump in compression. That would leave you .035" quench. That's how I'm set up.
#4
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,836 Likes
on
1,145 Posts
Never dyno'ed it. Just a street tune. I could guess, but it would be just that - a wild guess.
If I use my last quarter mile as a gauge, I ran 11.8 seconds. Running that through an internet calculator says 430 RWHP. That seems optimistic, to be honest. If someone chimed in with "you're closer to 410 with that setup" or something like that, I'd have nothing to counter their argument.
Regardless, it's very fun to drive, sounds impressive, and local mustangs and ricers won't even line up anymore at red lights
If I use my last quarter mile as a gauge, I ran 11.8 seconds. Running that through an internet calculator says 430 RWHP. That seems optimistic, to be honest. If someone chimed in with "you're closer to 410 with that setup" or something like that, I'd have nothing to counter their argument.
Regardless, it's very fun to drive, sounds impressive, and local mustangs and ricers won't even line up anymore at red lights
#5
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
If I recall correct, the BTR stage 2 cam is almost identical in duration to the Tick Performance SNS Torque Max Stage 2 cam, which I have. 227/235 110LSA. It's a very nice cam. Sounds amazing, makes great power throughout the powerband, but really comes to life around 4000 rpms.
#7
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,836 Likes
on
1,145 Posts
If I recall correct, the BTR stage 2 cam is almost identical in duration to the Tick Performance SNS Torque Max Stage 2 cam, which I have. 227/235 110LSA. It's a very nice cam. Sounds amazing, makes great power throughout the powerband, but really comes to life around 4000 rpms.