flowmasters suck?
#1
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 909
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
flowmasters suck?
ok, i know i dont have an ls1/ls2/ls6 engine...i have a 4.8 without any engine mods to it...i do have a single chamber delta force 3" thats dumped....i have been hearing more and more that flowmasters cause a loss in power along the curve...is this true? how does it happen? and, what good exhaust can i get thats around the price of a flowmaster and will sound similar dumped? thanks!
#6
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ft. Irwin, California (But Virginia is home)
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Full-Force
I think the flowmaster sucks expression mainly partains to the 80 series crossflow muffler for our cars.
Trending Topics
#12
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by Tally TransAm
even the single chambers and delta force race mufflers are restictive
i am running 1 3.5" delta force small case 2 chamber and loose 14 hp and 10 fltbs through the muffler as opposed to the cutouts
i am running 1 3.5" delta force small case 2 chamber and loose 14 hp and 10 fltbs through the muffler as opposed to the cutouts
#13
They don't suck, they blow
Originally Posted by simple02
ok, i know i dont have an ls1/ls2/ls6 engine...i have a 4.8 without any engine mods to it...i do have a single chamber delta force 3" thats dumped....i have been hearing more and more that flowmasters cause a loss in power along the curve...is this true? how does it happen? and, what good exhaust can i get thats around the price of a flowmaster and will sound similar dumped? thanks!
#14
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Jefferson, Ga
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would say with a 4.8 and a 1 chamber if anything you are loosing low end torque from not ENOUGH back pressure, it has more than enough flow for the little engine!!
Try to stay on topic people!
Try to stay on topic people!
#15
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Orange Park/ Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tally TransAm
even the single chambers and delta force race mufflers are restictive
i am running 1 3.5" delta force small case 2 chamber and loose 14 hp and 10 fltbs through the muffler as opposed to the cutouts
exactly! the only thing better than the 1-chamber is a bullet muffler. Besides, a 1-chamber flows better than a 2-chamber no matter how small the case, because it does have that one less chamber.
I agree though, the 80 series has proven itself to be very restrictive.
Originally Posted by Tally TransAm
even the single chambers and delta force race mufflers are restictive
i am running 1 3.5" delta force small case 2 chamber and loose 14 hp and 10 fltbs through the muffler as opposed to the cutouts
Originally Posted by Redneck Z
How can you say that single chambers are restrictive? They are as straight through as a muffler can possible be. There is no restriction in them at all.
I agree though, the 80 series has proven itself to be very restrictive.
#16
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Gainesville, Denton TX
Posts: 8,766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the catback system for the fbodys looses power.
too many people get these confused with other basic muffler only setups.
useing a 1in, 2 out config setup for the fbody like a stock setup with their mufflers, chokes.
the 40 series, etc on trucks will gain some power, especially over the stock muffler.
I ran a 3" in/out on my 5.3 and could tell a difference.. sounds nice on the trucks too.
in a true dual setup, or a non-catback style setup, they are proven mufflers, used on many many different setups.
Personally, I'd go with a magnaflow muffler on the truck, or something else, just to be a little different.
A few years ago every jeep, civic, ford, dodge caravan, everything had a damn flowmaster....
1993camaro of idaho, have you yet to post something informative, or do you just reword someone else's posts and try to make yourself sound more like a dumbass each post?
too many people get these confused with other basic muffler only setups.
useing a 1in, 2 out config setup for the fbody like a stock setup with their mufflers, chokes.
the 40 series, etc on trucks will gain some power, especially over the stock muffler.
I ran a 3" in/out on my 5.3 and could tell a difference.. sounds nice on the trucks too.
in a true dual setup, or a non-catback style setup, they are proven mufflers, used on many many different setups.
Personally, I'd go with a magnaflow muffler on the truck, or something else, just to be a little different.
A few years ago every jeep, civic, ford, dodge caravan, everything had a damn flowmaster....
1993camaro of idaho, have you yet to post something informative, or do you just reword someone else's posts and try to make yourself sound more like a dumbass each post?
#17
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (30)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Texarkana, Tx
Posts: 4,391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brandon
I ran a 3" in/out on my 5.3 and could tell a difference.. sounds nice on the trucks too.
in a true dual setup, or a non-catback style setup, they are proven mufflers, used on many many different setups.
in a true dual setup, or a non-catback style setup, they are proven mufflers, used on many many different setups.
Also had 3" 1-chambers on my '02 Z28. Best sounding setup I've had yet. I could feel a difference in it as well. The 80 series cross-flow mufflers suck. The one and two chambers are alot better. With my truck (stepside) 5.3,2-chamber Flowmaster & K&N drop-in filter, I could hang with most Mustangs and some LS1's up to about 60mph.
#18
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by 02Firehawk#614
I would say with a 4.8 and a 1 chamber if anything you are loosing low end torque from not ENOUGH back pressure, it has more than enough flow for the little engine!!
Try to stay on topic people!
Try to stay on topic people!