Pacesetter vs. Hooker
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: york, pa
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pacesetter vs. Hooker
Ok, for a n/a WS-6 TA.. which headers do you prefer and why? Pacesetters or Hookers? Both ceramic coated. Don't know which way to go.. looking for both ease of installation and performance my buddy is saying hooker but I see a lot of you have Pacesetter. Tell me what ya think thanks guys
-New LS1 Owner
P.S. if you have pictures of undercar installs you have done I'd appreciate you posting them for me to see how the ground clearance is! Thanks
-New LS1 Owner
P.S. if you have pictures of undercar installs you have done I'd appreciate you posting them for me to see how the ground clearance is! Thanks
#2
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
Ive installed both. Facts are as follows.
Hooker 5/16 flange Pacesetter 3/8 flange
Hooker o2 bungs outside Pacesetter o2 bungs inside
Hooker installs easy Pacesetter installs easier
Hooker I think is equal length
Hooker is more money but actually less header, Im mainly referring to the thicker flange of the Pace
They exit in same location and clearanceis about identical.
Hooker 5/16 flange Pacesetter 3/8 flange
Hooker o2 bungs outside Pacesetter o2 bungs inside
Hooker installs easy Pacesetter installs easier
Hooker I think is equal length
Hooker is more money but actually less header, Im mainly referring to the thicker flange of the Pace
They exit in same location and clearanceis about identical.