whos using K1 rods? how do u like them?
#5
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yea was hoping to talk to people that work with the rods in engines builds or are running them in there motors now. Thinking I might try them in my 1000hp build looks like nice parts
#6
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
I've used them in two engines and both engines spun rod bearings. One was likely an oiling problem the other I have no idea. Both had perfect housing bores and plenty of bearing clearance. I'm not blaming the rod, but I know it wasn't in the assembly of the Shortblock. One got Compstar rods in the rebuild and is still going strong.
IMHO, they look a little thin in the beam section. I'd check and see if they can handle the power levels you are shooting for.
IMHO, they look a little thin in the beam section. I'd check and see if they can handle the power levels you are shooting for.
Trending Topics
#8
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: North Royalton, Ohio
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Compstars are heavy vs. K1. Not to mention K1 holds much tighter tolerances on there rods as far as weight. I have seen Compstar sets as much as 5 grams off and they said that was acceptable!! K1's are always within 2 grams.
#11
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
We will be stocking a few sets of K1 rods here very shortly. While we don't plan on running a lot of them in our applications, we will however have them for customers that request them. When they arrive I'll compare them to the other brands we stock!!
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
#12
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Commerce Twp, MI
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Funny - was just talking to a local engine builder and he mentioned them with good things to say. Although their shop is primarily Mopar - he still knew quite a bit about them and recommended them to me.
#14
Unless you get into some sort of exotic steels, they all weigh the same (.283 pounds per cubic inch). The difference in weight between the K1 rod and the Compstar is in the design. With 27 years experiance designing connecting rods, I have learned a few things about making a rod strong yet light. Many of the others add mass to gain strength.
#15
We have 2 different (soon to be 3) different LS1 rods. Our current light weight rod is about 610 grams and the heavier version is reserved for big turbo or heavy nitrous applications.
#17
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
What is the HP rating/limit on the lightweight ones?
#18
A bit of the issue is some customers of K1 are running insane power and boost through the light weight ones and not breaking them. Although a rod manufacturer wouldn't want to state it, the first design (heavier) isn't needed at the power most of us produce. I believe both are still available though.
compstar, connecting, difference, good, hemi, horsepower, k1, lightweight, ls1, ls1tech, makes, rating, rod, rods, weight