Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Worked 317's or L92's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-14-2009, 02:35 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
ramdaspadhye's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Worked 317's or L92's

Here's what I'm working with...

73 Impala, 4k lbs wet with driver
LQ4 stock bottom end (except rod bolts)
Cam will be in the 22x/23x area high lifton a low lsa (110-108), not sure what grind I'm running yet
GM carb mani for whichever head
BG mighty demon 750dp

If I were to have my 317's worked, they would be CNC'ed by PRC with dual valve springs and milled .040, stock valves

If I went with the L92's, they would either be stock or CNC'ed, one of the two. Since I'm leaning towards a lower duration cam, I thought about sticking with the stock L92's as they already flow a crapload.

Last edited by ramdaspadhye; 06-14-2009 at 03:26 PM.
Old 06-14-2009, 03:04 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnnystock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,675
Received 38 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Is this a question???? L92 all the way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

stock L92 will be wayyy better than ported 317!!
Old 06-14-2009, 03:20 PM
  #3  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
ramdaspadhye's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I was asking because of my application and cam choice. Bigger heads aren't always better. I'm wanting a lot of power in the midrange, and larger intake runners tend to perform better up top :/

Anyone else?
Old 06-14-2009, 05:14 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
nastychevelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: troy, IL
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

l92 hheads and a custom cam from pat g or pred z
Old 06-14-2009, 05:20 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
ramdaspadhye's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yeah, I had Pred spec me a cam when i was gonna keep the stock 317 heads. I'll see what he has to say about a cam for the L92's. I just assumed that since the runners flowed so much more than the 317's it would need a lot different cam profile to compensate, since the heads and cam need to match
Old 06-15-2009, 06:09 AM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Actualy, the issue here is the dished pistons. L92 would have to be milled considerably to reach 10.5 SCR or above. If you were thinking about getting other heads, 243s would be my choice,
Or Patriot 6.0 castings 59cc (welded chambers) with 2.055 valves. (those might be harder to find, I do not think Patriot still makes them). A nice valve job on those witha bit of hand finish on the bowls would be worth the budget.
Old 06-15-2009, 11:36 AM
  #7  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
ramdaspadhye's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Well, how many CC's would the chambers need to be to achieve that? I can round up some LQ9 pistons for relatively cheap if needed...
Old 06-15-2009, 11:53 AM
  #8  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Unported L92 heads will work very well. With the L92 heads starting off 2.2cc smaller than unmilled 317s, you're already ahead of the game. LQ9 pistons will raise the compression another .5-.6 of a point which is a good move. An L92 head will generally need around 4 degrees less on the intake duration (but around the same exhaust duration) that you would typically spec for a 317. Just don't go too crazy on overlap as those high flowing intake valves on the L92s are more sensitive to reversion (because of their big flow at low lifts). This makes them a little harder to cam.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 06-15-2009, 12:06 PM
  #9  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
ramdaspadhye's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Max overlap should be around what? 12 or less?
Old 06-15-2009, 12:16 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

With 64.5cc (mill 4 cc) and LQ9 pistons with stock L92 gaskets you are looking ~ 11:1 SCR.
Old 06-15-2009, 12:42 PM
  #11  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
ramdaspadhye's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

And if I stuck with the LQ4 pistons, it'd be around 10.4-10.5, right? Would 11:1 be too high for pump gas?

Last edited by ramdaspadhye; 06-15-2009 at 01:32 PM.
Old 06-15-2009, 02:01 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

The LQ4 have about 6.7 cc dish, that would put you around ~9.8 SCR, That is why I said that you would have to mill too much and that 243s would be a more favorable choice (unless you want to change pistons, which mean basicaly a bottom end rebuild)
Old 06-15-2009, 04:56 PM
  #13  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
ramdaspadhye's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

All jokes aside, you think the power difference between going the 243 route would be a lot less than the L92 route?
Old 06-16-2009, 07:00 AM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Who is joking? I'm just giving you options:

Would L92s with flat tops and the right cam make better power? It depends how much you spend on the 243s.
Would Budget 243s make better power than L92s, NO
Is the LQ4 suited to L92s? NO, piston relief/dish too big. Good for boost.
Would a LS2 or LQ9 do the trick? Yes
Can you just replace the pistons (direct swap with nothing else done)? No, once you remove the crank, rods etc.. on a used motor, it is best to just rebuild since the bearings have seated, and cylinders need honing (doing it otherwise is a backyard fix and will not last long).
What would I do if I were you? I would sell the LQ4, shop around for a LQ9 and take it from there, or I would just rebuild the LQ4 with forged pistons (reliefs), 6.125 rods and take it from there with a stock LS3 headed setup (why LS3, because they have lightweight valves).

I hope this helps




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35 AM.