Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

ls6 cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-17-2003, 06:07 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
meSSman02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default ls6 cam

hey guys, fairly new to ls1 tech. question about ls6 cam do i need to install new springs retainers and push rods with this mild upgrade in cam install. its an 02 ss A4 thanks for the input.
Old 12-17-2003, 06:10 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
 
98SS Blackattack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You will need new springs. Other stuff are optional but good ideas
Old 12-17-2003, 06:12 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
meSSman02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what kind of horsepower do you see with this cam?
Old 12-17-2003, 06:26 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
 
98SS Blackattack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by meSSman02
what kind of horsepower do you see with this cam?
Most people get around 23rwhp from a ls6 cam. Wont get any below 4k but it really produces 5k and up. You need to bump up the shift points to around 6400rpm or so. You wont need a tune and the idle will sound stock. If you dont have a high stall converter get one.
Old 12-17-2003, 08:42 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,583
Received 1,432 Likes on 992 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 98SS Blackattack
You will need new springs. Other stuff are optional but good ideas
I thought 02 fbodies had the LS6 springs?

As for peak power ~23rwhp, but the real story is area under the curve. JMX posted a dyno graph of an LS1 cam to LS6 cam swap. The LS6 cam gainged ~50rwhp over the LS1 cam around 6,200 rpm.

I'll see if I can find the graph
Old 12-17-2003, 08:44 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,583
Received 1,432 Likes on 992 Posts

Default

Here's the thread but dyno graph isn't hosted any more.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/105849-ls1-vs-ls6-cam-dyno-graph.html
Old 12-18-2003, 10:10 AM
  #7  
TECH Regular
 
pekkaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99 Black Bird T/A
Here's the thread but dyno graph isn't hosted any more.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=105849

I remember the graph but I think the stock hp curve was just on top of and adjacent to one of the grids in the graph and people mistakenly compared ls6 hp curve to the torque curve of one of the cams.
Old 12-18-2003, 10:49 AM
  #8  
Staging Lane
 
SNW Vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Clemente, CA
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Smile LS1/6 retainers and pushrods

do i need to install new springs retainers and push rods with this mild upgrade

Hi,
The stock retainers & pushrods are the same parts for LS1 or LS6.
Steve
Old 12-18-2003, 10:10 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,583
Received 1,432 Likes on 992 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by pekkaz
I remember the graph but I think the stock hp curve was just on top of and adjacent to one of the grids in the graph and people mistakenly compared ls6 hp curve to the torque curve of one of the cams.
While I spoke from memory I did save a copy of the graph...I went back and looked up the following...

3200 to 4300 LS1 cam is ~3 to 5rwhp better
4300 to 4800 LS1 & LS6 are equal
4800+ LS6 is up to 40+rwhp better

rpm--LS1--LS6


4800--285--285
5000--295--300
5200--298--310
5400--295--315
5600--290--320
5800--285--321
5900--280--320
6000--???---320

Note the LS6 cam is 40rwhp over the LS1 cam at ~5900 rpm. I the mtor was spun even higher the LS1 cam would countinue to drop off much faster as the LS6 holds even or drops much slower. By ~6,300 to 6,500 rpm the LS6 will likely have ~50rwhp edge. Etc
Attached Thumbnails ls6 cam-ls1_vs_ls6cam.jpg  
Old 12-18-2003, 10:11 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,583
Received 1,432 Likes on 992 Posts

Default

The graph is a little hard to read.

BTW - Props to JMX otherwise we'd not have the graph to discuss.
Old 12-18-2003, 11:29 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
2xLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Warr Acres, OK
Posts: 5,649
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Here is another one.
Old 12-18-2003, 11:46 PM
  #12  
TECH Regular
 
pekkaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You're right 99ta, if you calculate hp from the better visible torque curve it goes exactly like you've highlited in the pic. I was earlier looking at the grid between 5.8 and 6 k at 300 hp.

Last edited by pekkaz; 12-18-2003 at 11:53 PM.
Old 12-23-2003, 10:47 PM
  #13  
Banned
iTrader: (71)
 
JJz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry, for buttin in but i am thinking about using this cam in my 2002 z28. I am wondering about what kind of torque #`s with the zo6 cam. any info would be great. thanks.
Old 12-24-2003, 01:28 AM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,583
Received 1,432 Likes on 992 Posts

Default

Click on the attached image to see the dyno graph. It has the torque and hp on it. It's in the box labeled attachment above.
Old 12-24-2003, 09:35 AM
  #15  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
BLK02WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: on the dyno tuning in MD
Posts: 2,583
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Not trying to hijack, but..

If you are not in a hurry, I'll have an LS6 cam and springs for sale in late Jan/early Feb. My new shortblock will hopefully be done and in by then. They have about 6k miles on them.

I'll be asking $150 + shipping. PM me if you are interested.
Old 12-24-2003, 12:26 PM
  #16  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
DrkPhx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St. Michael, MN.
Posts: 4,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I compared my stock dyno (GMAF, lid) to my 02 LS6 cam chart ( 02 LS6 cam, LS6 intake, MAC's with ORY,Hooker cat-back, FTRA,LS1edit tuned, Yank Y3200 TC) and the peak was 290 rwhp at 5400 rpms to 348 rwhp at 6000 rpms. But; 6000 rpms and above is where the big difference is. The stock dyno only goes to 6200 rpms which is 274 rwhp. The LS6 cam dyno is 344 rwhp at 6200 rpms and 342 rwhp at 6500 rpms.

Obviously the headers, intake and cat-back added hp, but the cam really pushed up the powerband in rpms, but more importantly kept it flat from 6000 rpms to 6500 rpms.

I feel the LS6 cam is the best stealth cam (especially for entry level) out there when you take in consideration ultra low cost, a true plug and play cam, no tuning or idle issues, no spring issues. There are other stealth cams that make more power, but as soon as you throw the price in the equation, the LS6 cam still is the best overall one.
Old 12-24-2003, 12:37 PM
  #17  
On The Tree
 
macool68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 124
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

the ls6 cam should be called ls1-vtec; my dyno before its install was 306 hp and 308 tq on a mustang dyno. After its install, the Z put down 357 hp and only 306 tq on the same dyno. The graph had a huge pike from 5500 to 6200 rpm; I'll try to post it up later, but I regret not going with another cam that has more meat in the curve.
Old 12-25-2003, 08:00 AM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BLKTA
I compared my stock dyno (GMAF, lid) to my 02 LS6 cam chart ( 02 LS6 cam, LS6 intake, MAC's with ORY,Hooker cat-back, FTRA,LS1edit tuned, Yank Y3200 TC) and the peak was 290 rwhp at 5400 rpms to 348 rwhp at 6000 rpms. But; 6000 rpms and above is where the big difference is. The stock dyno only goes to 6200 rpms which is 274 rwhp. The LS6 cam dyno is 344 rwhp at 6200 rpms and 342 rwhp at 6500 rpms.

Obviously the headers, intake and cat-back added hp, but the cam really pushed up the powerband in rpms, but more importantly kept it flat from 6000 rpms to 6500 rpms.

I feel the LS6 cam is the best stealth cam (especially for entry level) out there when you take in consideration ultra low cost, a true plug and play cam, no tuning or idle issues, no spring issues. There are other stealth cams that make more power, but as soon as you throw the price in the equation, the LS6 cam still is the best overall one.

couldnt agree more.
Old 12-25-2003, 02:01 PM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,583
Received 1,432 Likes on 992 Posts

Default

mmm...I think the LPE GT2-3 is an equal contender for the best stealth cam title too.
Old 12-25-2003, 07:25 PM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,583
Received 1,432 Likes on 992 Posts

Default

BTW did the 02 cars come with the LS6 springs?


Quick Reply: ls6 cam



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 PM.