Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C2 cam or TR230??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-01-2004, 05:56 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
John98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default C2 cam or TR230??

I have a 98 m6 with full bolt ons, im trying to decided what cam would be the best for the track the c2=224/224 581/581 112 or the TR 230 cam??? i dont want just to have a dyno queen, i want the cam that will give me the best track times. i have the stock 3.42 gear. thanks for the help
Old 01-01-2004, 06:00 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
 
98SS Blackattack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I would say the tr230 would be better for the track. The C2 more friendly on the street.
Old 01-01-2004, 06:16 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
 
Colonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Troy, AL
Posts: 9,246
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Stock 3.42 gears? That tells me you're not really that serious about track times. In that case, I'd go with the C2.
Old 01-01-2004, 07:25 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
John98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

well stock gears tell i get a 8.8 with 4.10's, which will be soon also.
Old 01-01-2004, 07:40 PM
  #5  
Cal
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Cal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 4,692
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I say go with the TR230 unless you have to pass emissions or like a smooth idle.
Old 01-01-2004, 07:47 PM
  #6  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
John98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

so the score is c2=1 tr230=2
Old 01-01-2004, 07:51 PM
  #7  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
CamaroCain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 4,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

why are those your only two options, is there someone that is selling those used? I wouldnt go any smaller than a 228 cam, but that is just me
Old 01-02-2004, 01:05 AM
  #8  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
John98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

well if anybody else has a opion on another good stock head, hit me up
Old 01-02-2004, 01:44 AM
  #9  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
2002SilverWS-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Rostraver, PA
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I just got the tr230 for Christmas and I can't wait to install it. I did alot of research with this cam and you definately nedd 4.10 gear and you probably won't pass a sniff test. I don't care about that. You will definately hear the car idle with the 111lsa. I have LS1 edit so tuning should not be a problem. Also there has been alot of people dyno 400 horse at the rear wheels. The only thing that I might be scared of is shifting at 6800rpm with the stock bottom end but you said your car won't see alot of track time so get the tr230. If you dont like it you could always get another cam.
Old 01-02-2004, 03:39 AM
  #10  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

i had a 230 and i'd go with the C2. the 230 will be best for the track, with gears and a good tune. i'd go with the C2 for better street manners and driveabity. the 230 sure does lope hard though.
Old 01-02-2004, 04:20 AM
  #11  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
bigeller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Iowa
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Go with the TR230.. It's a better cam plain and simple..
Old 01-02-2004, 08:43 AM
  #12  
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

TR230. Just my preference.
Old 01-02-2004, 10:15 AM
  #13  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
CamaroCain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 4,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by coolguy
well if anybody else has a opion on another good stock head, hit me up
maybe a TSP 231/237 cam. Do a search here on it.
Old 01-02-2004, 10:16 AM
  #14  
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CamaroCain
maybe a TSP 231/237 cam. Do a search here on it.
That's the cam I use. Great cam.
Old 01-02-2004, 10:23 AM
  #15  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
John98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

well i do like the fact that i dont have to shift soo high up with the c2, but at the same time i want a good great track cam,keep it coming guys, thanks
Old 01-02-2004, 10:25 AM
  #16  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
black_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What RPM do the 2 cams peak at?
Old 01-02-2004, 10:31 AM
  #17  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
John98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

the c2 like 6400-6600 im not sure
Old 01-02-2004, 01:56 PM
  #18  
TECH Resident
 
Jabroni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Orlando
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The C2 has been proven at the track. Ask Raughammer about it. He'll be able to tell you about the X1, too (as could many others on this board, too). Plenty of happy people with either cam on the track, but unless you want to spin it up tight, go C2. Generally higher duration cams make more power up high and like to be there, whereas a smaller duration will be more street friendly.
Old 01-02-2004, 02:30 PM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
General Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 532
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Why not consider the X1? The lift is pretty comparable to the C2 (.591/.571 versus .581/.581) if I remember correctly...

I have the X1 and love it. Idle quality will be better than the TR230 since the X1 is on a 112 lsa versus a 111 for the TR230.

My dyno numbers are in sig, 389.9 peak hp with cam/headers/borla/lid only. A couple more bolt ons should put me over 400.
Old 01-02-2004, 06:51 PM
  #20  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
John98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

well the x1 is nice but i have a c2 for sale, and a buddy of mine is selling his tr230,,, i want a cam that will give me noticeble power and better track times, with out blowing the **** out the bottom end



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33 AM.