What cam for stock 243's, FAST, and bolt ons?
#1
What cam for stock 243's, FAST, and bolt ons?
Hey guys what idealy would be the best can for stock 243's, a fast, and bolt ons be? Trying to figure out a build for a buddy, he hears an ms3 will work with the stock 243's but im sure we might have PTVC issues. Am I wrong, and if so what do you guys think of the G5x3 cam on stock 243's?
#6
Any cam that big is going to feel sluggish down ole with stock gearing IMO. Something to think about. I don't think I would go through the trouble of swapping heads if I was going to put stock 243's on. but then again if you mill them, there goes you PTV clearance.
#7
Well guys does anyone have any actual recommendations on cams? Also am I the only one that thinks big cams don't feel sluggish down low? I mean guys running 11.6x's-7x's on cam only bolt on ls1 cars, cutting some nice 60 foot times have to agree that with good tires, and a driver they aren't "slow" out of the hole. Maybe on a dyno which shows higher rpm torque peaks would imply a dog down low, but results from cam only builds, and driving cam only cars speaks another story.
So does anyone have recomendations on a good cam, that they didn't have PTV issues, or back to the original question...Will an MS3 work with stock 243/799 heads?
So does anyone have recomendations on a good cam, that they didn't have PTV issues, or back to the original question...Will an MS3 work with stock 243/799 heads?
Trending Topics
#8
On The Tree
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ragley, La
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well guys does anyone have any actual recommendations on cams? Also am I the only one that thinks big cams don't feel sluggish down low? I mean guys running 11.6x's-7x's on cam only bolt on ls1 cars, cutting some nice 60 foot times have to agree that with good tires, and a driver they aren't "slow" out of the hole. Maybe on a dyno which shows higher rpm torque peaks would imply a dog down low, but results from cam only builds, and driving cam only cars speaks another story.
So does anyone have recomendations on a good cam, that they didn't have PTV issues, or back to the original question...Will an MS3 work with stock 243/799 heads?
So does anyone have recomendations on a good cam, that they didn't have PTV issues, or back to the original question...Will an MS3 work with stock 243/799 heads?
#10
I said it would feel sluggish with stock gearing. Most fast cam only cars are running 4.11's with a 26in tire or 4.56's with a 28. See if you can find a few local cars with different set ups and go from there. I have daily driven my car with a 235/243 on a 111 with 4.11's and I think it's very tolerable. Others might not think so.
#12
TECH Enthusiast
Well guys does anyone have any actual recommendations on cams? Also am I the only one that thinks big cams don't feel sluggish down low? I mean guys running 11.6x's-7x's on cam only bolt on ls1 cars, cutting some nice 60 foot times have to agree that with good tires, and a driver they aren't "slow" out of the hole. Maybe on a dyno which shows higher rpm torque peaks would imply a dog down low, but results from cam only builds, and driving cam only cars speaks another story.
So does anyone have recomendations on a good cam, that they didn't have PTV issues, or back to the original question...Will an MS3 work with stock 243/799 heads?
So does anyone have recomendations on a good cam, that they didn't have PTV issues, or back to the original question...Will an MS3 work with stock 243/799 heads?
#13
Why are 243's and a FAST 92 a bad match? Gears that are currently in the car are 3:73's. Also if he is working off a budget, and can't afford aftermarket heads, I don't see why 243's would be a bad idea. Truth is more power is more power. If the heads net 20-30 wheel horse power, and only cost 300 bucks, that was a pretty easy 30 horse gain. Ill call TSP thanks guys.
#14
TECH Addict
#15
TECH Enthusiast
Why are 243's and a FAST 92 a bad match? Gears that are currently in the car are 3:73's. Also if he is working off a budget, and can't afford aftermarket heads, I don't see why 243's would be a bad idea. Truth is more power is more power. If the heads net 20-30 wheel horse power, and only cost 300 bucks, that was a pretty easy 30 horse gain. Ill call TSP thanks guys.
Also, how much you gain on stock 243 vs 241s depends on cam,intake,exhaust. It is not just bolt on 20-30rwhp.
Last edited by Felix C; 10-28-2015 at 09:03 AM.
#16
Originally Posted by GTOFAN91
Why are 243's and a FAST 92 a bad match? Gears that are currently in the car are 3:73's. Also if he is working off a budget, and can't afford aftermarket heads, I don't see why 243's would be a bad idea. Truth is more power is more power. If the heads net 20-30 wheel horse power, and only cost 300 bucks, that was a pretty easy 30 horse gain. Ill call TSP thanks guys.
#18
TECH Enthusiast
I just noticed something else. post #5 The valve springs in the 243s are too weak for a modern high lift camshaft. If you say "they will have the upgraded valvesprings" as in using the ones in the 243s then you will need an older low lift cam. Otherwise budget for valve springs to match the new camshaft.
Last edited by Felix C; 10-28-2015 at 12:16 PM.