112 lsa cam in cali
#1
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: northern cali.
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
112 lsa cam in cali
I done a search already and couldn't find what I was lookin for anyways,what is the biggest cam lift and duration that I can use to pass on a 112* lsa.I've heard people pass the hotcam with a good smog tune.would that be as big as I could go with a 112* lsa?
#4
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
agreed, all in the tune and overlap of the cam. if your trying to stay legal then i wouldnt push it, stick with what has proven to pass. no sense in getting something and hoping your tuner is able to get you to pass. or you can just say **** it and get what you want and cam swap.
#5
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: northern cali.
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jrp
agreed, all in the tune and overlap of the cam. if your trying to stay legal then i wouldnt push it, stick with what has proven to pass. no sense in getting something and hoping your tuner is able to get you to pass. or you can just say **** it and get what you want and cam swap.
#7
TECH Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bay Area/ UCI-VDC norte
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by lock down
I spoke to Dave at Black Magic Racing in Hayward and he told me that there is a company working on the 2 piece timing cover
Trending Topics
#10
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Huntington Beach, Ca
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A 112 LSA is almost guaranteed not to pass the sniffer in California; haven't seen one person do it even with tuning, a 224/224 114 Cam is biggest cam I've ever seen pass the sinffer here in Cali.
#11
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by Linear Velocity
A 112 LSA is almost guaranteed not to pass the sniffer in California; haven't seen one person do it even with tuning, a 224/224 114 Cam is biggest cam I've ever seen pass the sinffer here in Cali.
#12
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by Linear Velocity
A 112 LSA is almost guaranteed not to pass the sniffer in California; haven't seen one person do it even with tuning, a 224/224 114 Cam is biggest cam I've ever seen pass the sinffer here in Cali.
My '00 SS has a 220º/220º .581"/.581" XER cam with 112º lsa installed +4º. It also has an A4 trans and stock t/c. The exhaust system is completly stock including exhaust manifolds. the car sailed through the Cali smog test recently. Also, my '01 Silverado has a 214º/214º .560"/.560" 112º lsa cam and it also sailed past the test only exam.
Earlier this year I watched a Berger ZL-1 Camaro with the rare 427cid breeze through the Cali smog test. These cars are equipped with cams with over .600" lift and duration over 236º@.050". It also had the GMMG LT headers, high flow CATS and sewer pipe for exhaust. (I don't see LT headers hurting emissions therefore if the smog tech ignores their presence, you got away with SOMETHING).
What I'm trying to point out is that the onboard computer through the closed loop system is capable of correcting the a/f ratio under medium load conditions so to achieve stoich a/f ratio and therefore a clean tail pipe. Some daring individuals have passed their states emissions test without CATS using long cams with narrow lobe centers.
PCM tuning may or may not be required dependng on exact cam profile.
Hope this helps..........
Good luck,
Richard
#13
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a 112 in Cal but I also have -4 overlap. Stay away from cams with overlap and you should be gold. Also, if you are running stock heads you don't need to go that big. A 220 or 222 will make plenty of power. Check out my numbers through a 12 bolt with 4.11's. Good luck!
#14
TECH Addict
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central, MA
Posts: 2,620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Would corking up the exhaust a bit help with a larger duration cam?
The idea being that the extra exhaust backpressure would negate some of the scavenging effects of overlap.
Overlap is what fails emissions, right?
The idea being that the extra exhaust backpressure would negate some of the scavenging effects of overlap.
Overlap is what fails emissions, right?
#15
Originally Posted by Richard@WCCH
I hate to do this but......................
My '00 SS has a 220º/220º .581"/.581" XER cam with 112º lsa installed +4º. It also has an A4 trans and stock t/c. The exhaust system is completly stock including exhaust manifolds. the car sailed through the Cali smog test recently. Also, my '01 Silverado has a 214º/214º .560"/.560" 112º lsa cam and it also sailed past the test only exam.
Earlier this year I watched a Berger ZL-1 Camaro with the rare 427cid breeze through the Cali smog test. These cars are equipped with cams with over .600" lift and duration over 236º@.050". It also had the GMMG LT headers, high flow CATS and sewer pipe for exhaust. (I don't see LT headers hurting emissions therefore if the smog tech ignores their presence, you got away with SOMETHING).
What I'm trying to point out is that the onboard computer through the closed loop system is capable of correcting the a/f ratio under medium load conditions so to achieve stoich a/f ratio and therefore a clean tail pipe. Some daring individuals have passed their states emissions test without CATS using long cams with narrow lobe centers.
PCM tuning may or may not be required dependng on exact cam profile.
Hope this helps..........
Good luck,
Richard
My '00 SS has a 220º/220º .581"/.581" XER cam with 112º lsa installed +4º. It also has an A4 trans and stock t/c. The exhaust system is completly stock including exhaust manifolds. the car sailed through the Cali smog test recently. Also, my '01 Silverado has a 214º/214º .560"/.560" 112º lsa cam and it also sailed past the test only exam.
Earlier this year I watched a Berger ZL-1 Camaro with the rare 427cid breeze through the Cali smog test. These cars are equipped with cams with over .600" lift and duration over 236º@.050". It also had the GMMG LT headers, high flow CATS and sewer pipe for exhaust. (I don't see LT headers hurting emissions therefore if the smog tech ignores their presence, you got away with SOMETHING).
What I'm trying to point out is that the onboard computer through the closed loop system is capable of correcting the a/f ratio under medium load conditions so to achieve stoich a/f ratio and therefore a clean tail pipe. Some daring individuals have passed their states emissions test without CATS using long cams with narrow lobe centers.
PCM tuning may or may not be required dependng on exact cam profile.
Hope this helps..........
Good luck,
Richard
Last edited by Oatmeal; 07-02-2004 at 09:07 PM.
#16
On The Tree
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Fairfield Ca
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In my truck i have a 224/232-558/568 112lsa and with no cats, its on the edge of passing. With alittle tuning it will pass no problem or i can just throw on my cats and pass the way it is.
#17
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Huntington Beach, Ca
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Richard@WCCH
I hate to do this but......................
My '00 SS has a 220º/220º .581"/.581" XER cam with 112º lsa installed +4º. It also has an A4 trans and stock t/c. The exhaust system is completly stock including exhaust manifolds. the car sailed through the Cali smog test recently. Also, my '01 Silverado has a 214º/214º .560"/.560" 112º lsa cam and it also sailed past the test only exam.
Earlier this year I watched a Berger ZL-1 Camaro with the rare 427cid breeze through the Cali smog test. These cars are equipped with cams with over .600" lift and duration over 236º@.050". It also had the GMMG LT headers, high flow CATS and sewer pipe for exhaust. (I don't see LT headers hurting emissions therefore if the smog tech ignores their presence, you got away with SOMETHING).
What I'm trying to point out is that the onboard computer through the closed loop system is capable of correcting the a/f ratio under medium load conditions so to achieve stoich a/f ratio and therefore a clean tail pipe. Some daring individuals have passed their states emissions test without CATS using long cams with narrow lobe centers.
PCM tuning may or may not be required dependng on exact cam profile.
Hope this helps..........
Good luck,
Richard
My '00 SS has a 220º/220º .581"/.581" XER cam with 112º lsa installed +4º. It also has an A4 trans and stock t/c. The exhaust system is completly stock including exhaust manifolds. the car sailed through the Cali smog test recently. Also, my '01 Silverado has a 214º/214º .560"/.560" 112º lsa cam and it also sailed past the test only exam.
Earlier this year I watched a Berger ZL-1 Camaro with the rare 427cid breeze through the Cali smog test. These cars are equipped with cams with over .600" lift and duration over 236º@.050". It also had the GMMG LT headers, high flow CATS and sewer pipe for exhaust. (I don't see LT headers hurting emissions therefore if the smog tech ignores their presence, you got away with SOMETHING).
What I'm trying to point out is that the onboard computer through the closed loop system is capable of correcting the a/f ratio under medium load conditions so to achieve stoich a/f ratio and therefore a clean tail pipe. Some daring individuals have passed their states emissions test without CATS using long cams with narrow lobe centers.
PCM tuning may or may not be required dependng on exact cam profile.
Hope this helps..........
Good luck,
Richard
Yeah I guess with tuning, anything is possible.
But I'd personally have a higher duration cam on a 114, then a smaller one on a 112 for smog purposes. Just adding the I have seen multiple people not pass with a 112 LSA, I haven't seen one person fail with a 114. Again, if it were me 114 would fall under the better safe than sorry category, but to each his own.
#18
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think overlap has more to do with it than LSA. However, the cam I am looking to get will be pushing it at either 0* or -2* of overlap. Yet since the cars are tested at ~1250 rpm, you should be able to get a bigger cam to pass if it is leaned out.
#19
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by Trojan T/A
I think overlap has more to do with it than LSA. However, the cam I am looking to get will be pushing it at either 0* or -2* of overlap. Yet since the cars are tested at ~1250 rpm, you should be able to get a bigger cam to pass if it is leaned out.
This is an interesting topic guys. I appreciate all your ideas and input on this one. Any test results are gladly welcomed.
Richard
#20
What is the LSA on those ZL-1 camaro's? I hear these camero's have big cam's from the factory and they seem to pass, Any one have cam spec's on the ZL-1's, I would be happy with just a 224/224/112 in cali.