Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Theoretical Heads Design Idea

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-2004, 03:54 AM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
bursty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: STL
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Theoretical Heads Design Idea

Hey all,
I was writing a paper for a physics class, comparing the Rotary Engine to a typical 4 Stroke Piston motor. The primary advantage the rotary has is that there is no valvetrain at all. In an article i found, Ford stated that 70% of the restriction in an engine is due to the valvetrain, and i was thinking of how to combine the rotary's efficiency in a new head design for piston motors.

This is what i came up with, so tell me if I'm insane, or if this is common knowledge, or whatever, just gimme feedback.

One way the rotary gets around having to deal with a valvetrain is they implement ports, instead of valves....just bigass holes which allow a direct charge of airflow....no turbulence at all. So I got to thinking about what causes the turbulence in the valves? Well its the shape of the valve; ie the air has to flow around the head of the valve instead of being a direct shot. So what could i do to prevent this turbulence? Then it hit me....butterfly valves. If there could be some way to incorporate a butterfly valve into the heads, you could eliminate the turbulence caused by the air flowing around the head of the valve, giving it more of a direct charge, in turn allowing more air flow ie more power....

So what do ya think?
Old 07-07-2004, 10:26 AM
  #2  
TECH Resident
 
1BADFNZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How would you activate the valves?? What's going to open and close them??

Not bashing you just presenting a problem for ya
Old 07-07-2004, 10:48 AM
  #3  
TECH Addict
 
felton316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Doesn't some of the Subaru boxer engines have valves like that?
Old 07-07-2004, 11:06 AM
  #4  
Launching!
 
F1_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

the rotart motor has so many problems with it that its not even funny. 1. The rotary motor was first developed back in the day so its old technology. 2. Since there are no pistons and crank and connecting rods the displacement on the rotary is not EXACTLY known, it kinda a derived guess. 3. the rotary motor creates alot of smog. 4.The rotary engine creates extreme heat
Old 07-07-2004, 11:17 AM
  #5  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
foff667's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 7,986
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by F1_SS
the rotart motor has so many problems with it that its not even funny. 1. The rotary motor was first developed back in the day so its old technology.
what do you think a pushrod motor is? lol I just got a kick out of that one
Old 07-07-2004, 11:24 AM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
P Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

It would be hard to make butterfly valves work because the high pressure in the combustion chamber would try and fold them in half and they wouldn't seal very well. Traditional valves don't have that problem because the combustion chamber pressure presses them up against the valve seat so they seal well. There's another design called spherical rotary valves though, check out www.coatesengine.com
Old 07-07-2004, 11:34 AM
  #7  
Race your car!
iTrader: (50)
 
JL ws-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,420
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

I never really thought that rotary valve thing ever worked. Surprised it's still around. I wonder if you could somehow put a port in the side of the cylinder like a 2 cycle to enter air/fuel mixture, and have a valve only for exhaust release. That may work, and there would be alot less moving parts. Or, if you could somehow activate valves with a solenoid, rahter than a camshaft. No more cam changes, change the computer, you could go from a 50 mpg car, to a 600 HP car with the switch of a program. It would take a better man than me to figure out how to make it work, I just come up with the ideas.....
Old 07-07-2004, 11:41 AM
  #8  
Launching!
 
F1_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by foff667
what do you think a pushrod motor is? lol I just got a kick out of that one

Its old technology but it works. i would rather bend and replace pushrod than bend a connecting rod and replace that.
Old 07-07-2004, 11:41 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
MUSTANGEATER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Belleville, IL
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I think this is a good idea but going to take a lot of time and thinking out of the box to make it work. Unmodified and Naturally aspirated Rotary's are rather reliable motors. However once you get 1 degree of knock retard boom bye bye apex seal. The coolest part of a Rotary is you can brake your motor and drive the car home lol
Old 07-07-2004, 12:45 PM
  #10  
TECH Resident
 
1BADFNZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JL ws-6
Or, if you could somehow activate valves with a solenoid, rahter than a camshaft. No more cam changes, change the computer, you could go from a 50 mpg car, to a 600 HP car with the switch of a program. It would take a better man than me to figure out how to make it work, I just come up with the ideas.....
That's been worked on for some years now. They're just having problems with it. The problems they're having (or were having) was they couldn't get the solenoid's to open and shut fast enough. It will work on a low rpm engine but for high rpm's and such a camshaft is still sooo much faster.
Old 07-07-2004, 01:07 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (33)
 
Z06PSI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Thomson, GA
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Formula 1 is getting the electromagnetic valves soon. They are still testing them. In testing they are getting 24k Rpms. The way it works is a spherical ball with a hole drilled through it rotates on a axis and is turned by electromagnetic pulses on opposite sides of the ball. It is all computer controlled and mechanical loss is cut down considerably. Piston movement is the only dedicated mechanical device in the motor. Right now they use pneumatic valves on their 3.0 ltr v-10 850 h.p. motors that will survive 19k rpm's...

The solenoid is being skipped becuase of its mechanical properties.
Old 07-07-2004, 09:50 PM
  #12  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
bursty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: STL
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They way i had planned to actuate (sp?) the valves opening and closing is by still using the rockers but just have them push down on one side of the butterfly valve, causing that side to dump and the other to lift...ie opening the valve

The one issue i didnt think about was the sealing of the valve. That would definitely present a problem


Thanks for feedback though guys
Old 07-07-2004, 09:57 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
 
SSactionLs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: nor cal (ripon)
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by F1_SS
the rotart motor has so many problems with it that its not even funny. 1. The rotary motor was first developed back in the day so its old technology. 2. Since there are no pistons and crank and connecting rods the displacement on the rotary is not EXACTLY known, it kinda a derived guess. 3. the rotary motor creates alot of smog. 4.The rotary engine creates extreme heat

NA rotary motors are some of THE MOST RELIABLE ENGINES EVER. Its when you put boost to them that they get unreliable.. and by inreliable i mean bad design from mazda as far as heat extraction.
Old 07-07-2004, 09:58 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
 
SSactionLs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: nor cal (ripon)
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bursty
They way i had planned to actuate (sp?) the valves opening and closing is by still using the rockers but just have them push down on one side of the butterfly valve, causing that side to dump and the other to lift...ie opening the valve

The one issue i didnt think about was the sealing of the valve. That would definitely present a problem


Thanks for feedback though guys
You could have a long shaft the length of the head controll them electronicly.
Old 07-07-2004, 10:40 PM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
TAQuickness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redrumss
Formula 1 is getting the electromagnetic valves soon. They are still testing them. In testing they are getting 24k Rpms. The way it works is a spherical ball with a hole drilled through it rotates on a axis and is turned by electromagnetic pulses on opposite sides of the ball. It is all computer controlled and mechanical loss is cut down considerably. Piston movement is the only dedicated mechanical device in the motor. Right now they use pneumatic valves on their 3.0 ltr v-10 850 h.p. motors that will survive 19k rpm's...

The solenoid is being skipped becuase of its mechanical properties.

I was discussing this with a friend about 6 months ago... A high speed ball valve would be your best bet.

Asuming you could get the reliability from the ball valves, how would that effect the over head design?
Old 07-07-2004, 10:52 PM
  #16  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Jammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 3,657
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

I think you could be onto something... just need a team of 5 guys and 10 million bucks..a superior lab and several years...but you are onto something
Old 07-08-2004, 01:29 AM
  #17  
TECH Addict
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mefis
Posts: 2,582
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

by saying pnuematic valves I think you mean the valve springs. The valve springs are actually containers filled with air to whatever seat pressure they want. The best part about doing it that way is that air never fatigues like steel or titanium does at those high cyclical rates like around 19,000 rpm.

The killer set-up would be a electrically driven rotary vlave setup. LIke the Coates Spherical Rotary valves. But then you have to worry about reliability and synchronization of the vales with the engine. BMW has taken te next step with it's variable lift valvetrain. There is no throttle valve(butterfly) in the way, so there is no restriction in the intake tract just smooth nonturbulent air.
Old 07-08-2004, 02:13 AM
  #18  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve - Race Eng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oceanside, Ca.
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 123 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

www.roton-engines.com

Download the pdf file which explains the concept of their rotary valves.

Also, issue #4 of "Race Engine Technology" magazine has a nice technical article on the heads with great photos.

You can order back issues of "Race Engine Technology" from EWA in New Jersey.

Steve Demirjian
Race Engine Development





Originally Posted by bursty
Hey all,
I was writing a paper for a physics class, comparing the Rotary Engine to a typical 4 Stroke Piston motor. The primary advantage the rotary has is that there is no valvetrain at all. In an article i found, Ford stated that 70% of the restriction in an engine is due to the valvetrain, and i was thinking of how to combine the rotary's efficiency in a new head design for piston motors.

This is what i came up with, so tell me if I'm insane, or if this is common knowledge, or whatever, just gimme feedback.

One way the rotary gets around having to deal with a valvetrain is they implement ports, instead of valves....just bigass holes which allow a direct charge of airflow....no turbulence at all. So I got to thinking about what causes the turbulence in the valves? Well its the shape of the valve; ie the air has to flow around the head of the valve instead of being a direct shot. So what could i do to prevent this turbulence? Then it hit me....butterfly valves. If there could be some way to incorporate a butterfly valve into the heads, you could eliminate the turbulence caused by the air flowing around the head of the valve, giving it more of a direct charge, in turn allowing more air flow ie more power....

So what do ya think?
Old 09-03-2004, 04:06 PM
  #19  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
LS1PoweredZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jupiter, FL
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I found your answer ---->http://www.coatesengine.com/index.html
That is freakin awsome.

Kevin
Old 09-03-2004, 04:59 PM
  #20  
B T
Launching!
 
B T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I see that has already been posted

I gotta slow down and read.

My bad!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:34 AM.