Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Cam expert needed for my set up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-15-2005, 12:58 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
General Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 530
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Cam expert needed for my set up

OK, my Z28 is the daily driver, my wants are as follows:
  • Peak power before 6,500 rpms
  • Peak HP of 440+
  • Solid low end & midrange torque
  • Lift below .600
  • Good lope

I'm planning on AFR 205 heads this fall, but trying to decide whether I need a new cam. My current cam and other mods are in the sig. I appreciate the help as I want to achieve the goals listed above on the first pass. I'm thinking my current cam might get me there, but I'd love some opinions.
Old 07-15-2005, 03:01 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
co.6z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: huntingtown ,MD
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i would ask tony@afr. see what he recomends. you could also call up futral and have him do a custom grind
Old 07-15-2005, 05:29 PM
  #3  
11 Second Club
 
blkZ28spt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Why lift below .600?

I would also call tony, since you will be using their heads.

You may not need to swap cams. AFR's plus underdrive crank pulley could get you pretty dang close. You could always spring for an LSX intake manifold.
Old 07-15-2005, 05:33 PM
  #4  
Teching In
 
yaboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Napa, Ca
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blkZ28spt
Why lift below .600?

.

maybe because cams with .600+ lift make mostly high end power and i believe one of his criteria for his choice of cam was low end and midrange power

just a guess
Old 07-15-2005, 05:38 PM
  #5  
Teching In
 
yaboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Napa, Ca
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blkZ28spt
You need to read the cam guide and cam discussions. For one, duration/overlap is largely what determines the powerband, not lift. High lift cams don't necessarily make mostly high end power. It's also a misconception that staying with slighly lower lifts will be easy on springs. There are plenty of .580 lift cams that are hell on springs due to the harsh lobes.
i said MOSTLY buddy, not all cams. i never said anything about cams with less than .600 lift will be easy on springs.

again, it was just a guess. okayy............
Old 07-15-2005, 05:41 PM
  #6  
11 Second Club
 
blkZ28spt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by yaboy
i said MOSTLY buddy, not all cams.
No, you didn't. Not the way you phrased it.
Originally Posted by yaboy
maybe because cams with .600+ lift make mostly high end power

I just threw the spring thing out there because people seem to think that if they get a .585 lift cam it'll automatically be much easier on springs than one with .605 lift.
Old 07-15-2005, 05:44 PM
  #7  
Teching In
 
yaboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Napa, Ca
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blkZ28spt
No, you didn't. Not the way you phrased it.

yes i did. you just interpreted it incorrectly, thats all
Old 07-15-2005, 05:52 PM
  #8  
Teching In
 
yaboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Napa, Ca
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

....back to the topic cuz we're obviously but lets also not assume what other people may think without proof about the claim you just made.
Old 07-15-2005, 05:57 PM
  #9  
11 Second Club
 
blkZ28spt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by yaboy
yes i did. you just interpreted it incorrectly, thats all
No, I didn't. I am gong to stop now, and I deleted a few of my other posts. Ask anyone else, you imply all cams with .600+ lift the way you phrased it.
Old 07-15-2005, 07:13 PM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
General Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 530
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Man, step away from the computer for an hour and you miss everything.

Really, the .600 lift thing was just to try and get some longevity out of the springs, and yes, combined with the fact I'd like solid low end and most cams with .600+ lift also have well over 230+ duration. I figure with the AFR heads I won't have to go with a huge cam to make my hp goal. I'd like good hp but strong low to mid range torque as well.
Old 07-15-2005, 07:21 PM
  #11  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

228/232 .588/.595 113LSA 112ICL. Perfect valve events for ARF 205s. Basically, a little beefier version of Tony Mamo's 224/228 114LSA 113ICL cam. Valve events are almost identical, but mine's just a hair bigger. I'll probably run this 228/232 cam in my can in the future. It's that good.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 07-15-2005, 08:13 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
General Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 530
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Patrick G
228/232 .588/.595 113LSA 112ICL. Perfect valve events for ARF 205s. Basically, a little beefier version of Tony Mamo's 224/228 114LSA 113ICL cam. Valve events are almost identical, but mine's just a hair bigger. I'll probably run this 228/232 cam in my can in the future. It's that good.
This raises a question I've brought up in other threads but not really gotten an answer. Do traditional split cams with a +4 difference in duration at 0.50 perform the best with the AFR 205s? Seems like these are often recommended with that head.

I appreciate the info., I'll keep that cam in mind. Who sells it, I don't immediately recognize the specs.
Old 07-15-2005, 08:39 PM
  #13  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Sport Side's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Patrick G
228/232 .588/.595 113LSA 112ICL. Perfect valve events for ARF 205s. Basically, a little beefier version of Tony Mamo's 224/228 114LSA 113ICL cam. Valve events are almost identical, but mine's just a hair bigger. I'll probably run this 228/232 cam in my can in the future. It's that good.
Patrick. Would you consider using the same .05'' specs on the exhaust lobe but only slow the ramp speed down a bit? I'm thinkin' this might flatten/broadin' the torque curve but still offer enough exhaust-lobe area to expel the spent gases depending on the rest of the systems capabilities.
Old 07-15-2005, 09:45 PM
  #14  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

You could slow down the ramp speed on the exhaust lobe, but that would increase overlap at .006". Increased overlap at .006" (but not at .050") will make idle worse, vacuum at idle worse and low speed driveability worse. I'd rather trade a little spring life for better street manners and more power.

BTW, nobody makes this cam, but Thunder Racing can have Comp grind it for you for $399.
Old 07-16-2005, 10:47 AM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (42)
 
slt200mph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: HOT'LANA, GAWJA
Posts: 7,067
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by EverclearZ
OK, my Z28 is the daily driver, my wants are as follows:
  • Peak power before 6,500 rpms
  • Peak HP of 440+
  • Solid low end & midrange torque
  • Lift below .600
  • Good lope

I'm planning on AFR 205 heads this fall, but trying to decide whether I need a new cam. My current cam and other mods are in the sig. I appreciate the help as I want to achieve the goals listed above on the first pass. I'm thinking my current cam might get me there, but I'd love some opinions.

You are going to need more cam than what you have now to hit 440 RWHP..

Last edited by slt200mph; 07-16-2005 at 02:38 PM.
Old 07-16-2005, 02:58 PM
  #16  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
General Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 530
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by slt200mph
You are going to need more cam than what you have now to hit 440 RWHP..
Because of the 12 bolt and 4.10s? I had 390 without most bolt-ons, but that was before the Moser. I figured the AFRs would be worth close to 50 peak hp. Is that not a good assumption?

Really I'd like 500 fwhp, I figured at 440 rwhp through the 12 bolt I'd easy be over 500 at the crank. Maybe I really only need to shoot for 430 or slightly less considering the additional parasitic loss from the rear and gears.
Old 07-16-2005, 03:51 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (42)
 
slt200mph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: HOT'LANA, GAWJA
Posts: 7,067
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by EverclearZ
Because of the 12 bolt and 4.10s? I had 390 without most bolt-ons, but that was before the Moser. I figured the AFRs would be worth close to 50 peak hp. Is that not a good assumption?

Really I'd like 500 fwhp, I figured at 440 rwhp through the 12 bolt I'd easy be over 500 at the crank. Maybe I really only need to shoot for 430 or slightly less considering the additional parasitic loss from the rear and gears.

I think that you are being a little optimistic on 50 HP for the heads..
Old 07-16-2005, 04:00 PM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (42)
 
slt200mph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: HOT'LANA, GAWJA
Posts: 7,067
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Figure about a 15% loss from crank to rear wheels. 500 HP minus 15% is 425HP..you going to need about 520 HP at the crank to get to 440 RWHP ..that makes me think you are going to need alot more cam than what you have with the addition of good heads..IMHO they worth 35 HP...just my .02 cents..good luck with the project..




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44 PM.