Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

214/218 XE-Lobes VS. XFI Lobes....Compare!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-12-2006, 10:11 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
02RedHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 214/218 XE-Lobes VS. XFI Lobes....Compare!

How much power would you say is being "left on the table" if a 214/218 112+2 cam was chosen with XE lobes, instead of XFI lobes? (Assume its with a great set of ported heads that flows well to .600" (ie, 300+cfm, along with PRC dual-springs .650", and LT Headers). See comparison below....

214/218 112+2

Lobe:________________XE___________________________ _XFI_______
Lift (1.7 rocker)____.559"/.563"_____________________.600"/.590"_______
___________.006"____.050"_____.200"_________.006"_ ___.050"_____.200"
Duration___267/271__214/218__133/136______264/270__214/218__139/141
IVO________23.5______-3______-43.5_________22_______-3______-40.5
IVC________63.5______37______-3.5__________62_______37______-0.5
EVO________69.5_____43________2___________69______ _43_______4.5
EVC________21.5_____-5_______-46__________21_______-5_______-43.5
Overlap______45______-8______-89.5_________43_______-8_______-84


I know the XFI 214/218 will idle slightly smoother than the XE 214/218, however the XFI should also have more valvetrain noise and reduced valvespring life, correct?

But beyond that, how much HP/Tq (educated guesses) would stand to be gained with the extra .041"/.027" lift, and the more agressive lobe (ie, more "area under the curve") that the XFI has?

Thanks!
Old 08-13-2006, 02:40 AM
  #2  
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Tom@SpeedInc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If you want to compare XFI vs. XER, minus the intake advertised duration vs. duration @ .050" this gives you an intensity number. The XE has an "intensity" of 53* the XFI cam is 50*. The smaller the intensity number the quicker the valve is open, the XFI has the intake valve open for longer period under the curve.

XFI more valvetrain noise? My 402 was whisper quiet with a XFI cam. XFI cams are better for a daily driver.

Last edited by GMH GTO; 08-13-2006 at 02:47 AM.
Old 08-13-2006, 08:38 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
02RedHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks for the reply; any feedback from others?

GMH GTO - can you clarify why you say that XFIs are better for a DD, versus the XE?
Old 08-14-2006, 11:40 AM
  #4  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
Christopher Sims's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Harrodsburg, KY
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Go XFI

I have an XFI 214/218 on a 112 with ICL of 113. You can barely hear it w/o a tune (6 sp). It will give a good DCR with stock heads. With CNC LS6 heads and cometic .040s it's a torque monster and wears the rev limiter out. Also, the valvetrain is quiet. With a tune, it'll be stealth. I wish I had gone with the 218 XFI intake and a XE-R 224 exhaust (it's a lil' quicker off the seat than XFI exhaust). Good luck!
Old 08-14-2006, 11:55 AM
  #5  
Banned
iTrader: (23)
 
JZ'sTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ft. Myers Fl
Posts: 3,126
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I would go XFI myself.
Personially I would go with a cheeter cam over the 214/218.
Old 08-14-2006, 12:36 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

I would prefer a LSK/XE-R, int/exh
Old 08-14-2006, 01:47 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
02RedHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
I would prefer a LSK/XE-R, int/exh
Too much for a DD, that's why I'm looking at the comparison between the XFI and XE....
Old 08-14-2006, 02:08 PM
  #8  
Banned
iTrader: (23)
 
JZ'sTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ft. Myers Fl
Posts: 3,126
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Why do you say that's to much for a DD?
Have you tried it before or are you just guessing?
Old 08-14-2006, 03:57 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
02RedHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JZ'sTA
Why do you say that's to much for a DD?
Have you tried it before or are you just guessing?
Don't want that aggressive of a lobe for a DD, that's all. Looking for a little better valvetrain longevity than what the XER/LSK would provide.
Old 08-14-2006, 04:13 PM
  #10  
Banned
iTrader: (23)
 
JZ'sTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ft. Myers Fl
Posts: 3,126
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I don't know if you have noticed but people continue to get 30,000+ miles out of the XER stuff with 918 springs.
Old 08-14-2006, 06:29 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Some poeple are getting 30K miles with duals and the LSK lobes, not an issue if setup properly.
Old 08-14-2006, 09:36 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
02RedHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That's cool...But, XE-Rs aren't available in smaller than 220 durations. And if we can get 30k+ out of XE-Rs and LSKs, then thats all the better for my goal of getting 40k+ out of the XFI or XE!

TTT for more responses to my original questions in my first posting above.
Old 08-15-2006, 03:50 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

XFI's work well. You pick up 6* at .200 lift and that works out to about 4% more area. That's a nice gain. Probably as much area as 218/222 XE cam (I didn't look it up, so that is an estimate) At .300 it is much bigger relative gain. Plus they should idle nicely.

With your combo, I'd put it on a 111 straight up. If your heads have raised your CR, you'll have a very high DCR and that's still -6 overlap so it should be a snap to tune. That will give you strong low end and still pull through 6200 or higher.
Old 08-15-2006, 04:28 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
 
CHRISPY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

How are the stock lifters holding up to the XFI cams?

Old 08-15-2006, 08:35 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (59)
 
Bo White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vance, Alabama
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Im runnin the 218 XE lobe in the intake side of my cam and its a DD with the stock converter. Super "stock like" driveabilty so dont worry about going slightly larger on your cam choice.
Old 08-15-2006, 08:42 PM
  #16  
Teching In
 
LsReddog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 02RedHawk
How much power would you say is being "left on the table" if a 214/218 112+2 cam was chosen with XE lobes, instead of XFI lobes? (Assume its with a great set of ported heads that flows well to .600" (ie, 300+cfm, along with PRC dual-springs .650", and LT Headers). See comparison below....

214/218 112+2

Lobe:________________XE___________________________ _XFI_______
Lift (1.7 rocker)____.559"/.563"_____________________.600"/.590"_______
___________.006"____.050"_____.200"_________.006"_ ___.050"_____.200"
Duration___267/271__214/218__133/136______264/270__214/218__139/141
IVO________23.5______-3______-43.5_________22_______-3______-40.5
IVC________63.5______37______-3.5__________62_______37______-0.5
EVO________69.5_____43________2___________69______ _43_______4.5
EVC________21.5_____-5_______-46__________21_______-5_______-43.5
Overlap______45______-8______-89.5_________43_______-8_______-84


I know the XFI 214/218 will idle slightly smoother than the XE 214/218, however the XFI should also have more valvetrain noise and reduced valvespring life, correct?

But beyond that, how much HP/Tq (educated guesses) would stand to be gained with the extra .041"/.027" lift, and the more agressive lobe (ie, more "area under the curve") that the XFI has?

Thanks!
You wouldnt know/feel/measure the difference



Quick Reply: 214/218 XE-Lobes VS. XFI Lobes....Compare!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 PM.