214/218 XE-Lobes VS. XFI Lobes....Compare!
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
214/218 XE-Lobes VS. XFI Lobes....Compare!
How much power would you say is being "left on the table" if a 214/218 112+2 cam was chosen with XE lobes, instead of XFI lobes? (Assume its with a great set of ported heads that flows well to .600" (ie, 300+cfm, along with PRC dual-springs .650", and LT Headers). See comparison below....
214/218 112+2
Lobe:________________XE___________________________ _XFI_______
Lift (1.7 rocker)____.559"/.563"_____________________.600"/.590"_______
___________.006"____.050"_____.200"_________.006"_ ___.050"_____.200"
Duration___267/271__214/218__133/136______264/270__214/218__139/141
IVO________23.5______-3______-43.5_________22_______-3______-40.5
IVC________63.5______37______-3.5__________62_______37______-0.5
EVO________69.5_____43________2___________69______ _43_______4.5
EVC________21.5_____-5_______-46__________21_______-5_______-43.5
Overlap______45______-8______-89.5_________43_______-8_______-84
I know the XFI 214/218 will idle slightly smoother than the XE 214/218, however the XFI should also have more valvetrain noise and reduced valvespring life, correct?
But beyond that, how much HP/Tq (educated guesses) would stand to be gained with the extra .041"/.027" lift, and the more agressive lobe (ie, more "area under the curve") that the XFI has?
Thanks!
214/218 112+2
Lobe:________________XE___________________________ _XFI_______
Lift (1.7 rocker)____.559"/.563"_____________________.600"/.590"_______
___________.006"____.050"_____.200"_________.006"_ ___.050"_____.200"
Duration___267/271__214/218__133/136______264/270__214/218__139/141
IVO________23.5______-3______-43.5_________22_______-3______-40.5
IVC________63.5______37______-3.5__________62_______37______-0.5
EVO________69.5_____43________2___________69______ _43_______4.5
EVC________21.5_____-5_______-46__________21_______-5_______-43.5
Overlap______45______-8______-89.5_________43_______-8_______-84
I know the XFI 214/218 will idle slightly smoother than the XE 214/218, however the XFI should also have more valvetrain noise and reduced valvespring life, correct?
But beyond that, how much HP/Tq (educated guesses) would stand to be gained with the extra .041"/.027" lift, and the more agressive lobe (ie, more "area under the curve") that the XFI has?
Thanks!
#2
Banned
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you want to compare XFI vs. XER, minus the intake advertised duration vs. duration @ .050" this gives you an intensity number. The XE has an "intensity" of 53* the XFI cam is 50*. The smaller the intensity number the quicker the valve is open, the XFI has the intake valve open for longer period under the curve.
XFI more valvetrain noise? My 402 was whisper quiet with a XFI cam. XFI cams are better for a daily driver.
XFI more valvetrain noise? My 402 was whisper quiet with a XFI cam. XFI cams are better for a daily driver.
Last edited by GMH GTO; 08-13-2006 at 02:47 AM.
#4
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Harrodsburg, KY
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Go XFI
I have an XFI 214/218 on a 112 with ICL of 113. You can barely hear it w/o a tune (6 sp). It will give a good DCR with stock heads. With CNC LS6 heads and cometic .040s it's a torque monster and wears the rev limiter out. Also, the valvetrain is quiet. With a tune, it'll be stealth. I wish I had gone with the 218 XFI intake and a XE-R 224 exhaust (it's a lil' quicker off the seat than XFI exhaust). Good luck!
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JZ'sTA
Why do you say that's to much for a DD?
Have you tried it before or are you just guessing?
Have you tried it before or are you just guessing?
#12
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's cool...But, XE-Rs aren't available in smaller than 220 durations. And if we can get 30k+ out of XE-Rs and LSKs, then thats all the better for my goal of getting 40k+ out of the XFI or XE!
TTT for more responses to my original questions in my first posting above.
TTT for more responses to my original questions in my first posting above.
#13
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
XFI's work well. You pick up 6* at .200 lift and that works out to about 4% more area. That's a nice gain. Probably as much area as 218/222 XE cam (I didn't look it up, so that is an estimate) At .300 it is much bigger relative gain. Plus they should idle nicely.
With your combo, I'd put it on a 111 straight up. If your heads have raised your CR, you'll have a very high DCR and that's still -6 overlap so it should be a snap to tune. That will give you strong low end and still pull through 6200 or higher.
With your combo, I'd put it on a 111 straight up. If your heads have raised your CR, you'll have a very high DCR and that's still -6 overlap so it should be a snap to tune. That will give you strong low end and still pull through 6200 or higher.
#15
TECH Addict
iTrader: (59)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vance, Alabama
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im runnin the 218 XE lobe in the intake side of my cam and its a DD with the stock converter. Super "stock like" driveabilty so dont worry about going slightly larger on your cam choice.
#16
Originally Posted by 02RedHawk
How much power would you say is being "left on the table" if a 214/218 112+2 cam was chosen with XE lobes, instead of XFI lobes? (Assume its with a great set of ported heads that flows well to .600" (ie, 300+cfm, along with PRC dual-springs .650", and LT Headers). See comparison below....
214/218 112+2
Lobe:________________XE___________________________ _XFI_______
Lift (1.7 rocker)____.559"/.563"_____________________.600"/.590"_______
___________.006"____.050"_____.200"_________.006"_ ___.050"_____.200"
Duration___267/271__214/218__133/136______264/270__214/218__139/141
IVO________23.5______-3______-43.5_________22_______-3______-40.5
IVC________63.5______37______-3.5__________62_______37______-0.5
EVO________69.5_____43________2___________69______ _43_______4.5
EVC________21.5_____-5_______-46__________21_______-5_______-43.5
Overlap______45______-8______-89.5_________43_______-8_______-84
I know the XFI 214/218 will idle slightly smoother than the XE 214/218, however the XFI should also have more valvetrain noise and reduced valvespring life, correct?
But beyond that, how much HP/Tq (educated guesses) would stand to be gained with the extra .041"/.027" lift, and the more agressive lobe (ie, more "area under the curve") that the XFI has?
Thanks!
214/218 112+2
Lobe:________________XE___________________________ _XFI_______
Lift (1.7 rocker)____.559"/.563"_____________________.600"/.590"_______
___________.006"____.050"_____.200"_________.006"_ ___.050"_____.200"
Duration___267/271__214/218__133/136______264/270__214/218__139/141
IVO________23.5______-3______-43.5_________22_______-3______-40.5
IVC________63.5______37______-3.5__________62_______37______-0.5
EVO________69.5_____43________2___________69______ _43_______4.5
EVC________21.5_____-5_______-46__________21_______-5_______-43.5
Overlap______45______-8______-89.5_________43_______-8_______-84
I know the XFI 214/218 will idle slightly smoother than the XE 214/218, however the XFI should also have more valvetrain noise and reduced valvespring life, correct?
But beyond that, how much HP/Tq (educated guesses) would stand to be gained with the extra .041"/.027" lift, and the more agressive lobe (ie, more "area under the curve") that the XFI has?
Thanks!