LG g5x-2 vs TSP TV2
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LG g5x-2 vs TSP TV2
G5X2 232/240 .595/.609 112 vs TV2 232/234 .595/.598 112
i am very interested in these two cams, which one makes more power all around? i will be running one of these cams with heads so what would you recommend? the g5x2 seems to make more power down low. my goals are mid 11's with h/c, ls6 intake, pulley, ptb, lid, kooks 1 3/4 headers, ORY, cutout, magnaflow, S60 with 4:10, race weight should be around 3500ish. from what ive read the tv2 lack a lil trq down low, am i wrong with both of these cams and should i go a lil smaller like a 228r? thanks in advance
i am very interested in these two cams, which one makes more power all around? i will be running one of these cams with heads so what would you recommend? the g5x2 seems to make more power down low. my goals are mid 11's with h/c, ls6 intake, pulley, ptb, lid, kooks 1 3/4 headers, ORY, cutout, magnaflow, S60 with 4:10, race weight should be around 3500ish. from what ive read the tv2 lack a lil trq down low, am i wrong with both of these cams and should i go a lil smaller like a 228r? thanks in advance
Last edited by Numba1Stunna; 07-24-2007 at 03:57 PM.
#4
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SLP4CamaroSS
i got the g5x3 112lsa i love the cam but i wish i would of went smaller. so ill say the g5x1 112lsa or that 228r that u suggested
#6
Teching In
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The X2 gets my vote. Attached is my dyno sheet from a couple of weeks ago. I am very happy with my set-up and results. I was worried about driveability, but as it has been stated over and over again - it is all in the tune. Check out my sig. for a list of mods.
#7
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by zo6racerx
The X2 gets my vote. Attached is my dyno sheet from a couple of weeks ago. I am very happy with my set-up and results. I was worried about driveability, but as it has been stated over and over again - it is all in the tune. Check out my sig. for a list of mods.
Trending Topics
#9
Teching In
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Numba1Stunna
you car makes some killer numbers is that with a ls6 intake manifold
#10
TECH Addict
iTrader: (35)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by zo6racerx
Yes. I am still running the stock LS6 intake, TB and MAF. For me, the AFR heads were the only choice. As for cams, I was going LG all the way. I wanted a "proven" set-up. I researched H/C set-ups for months before pulling the trigger. AFRs with LG cams always seem to deliver the goods.
#11
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lawton, ok
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CodeName Z06
Why would you have gone smaller, is it because of the streetability of the bigger cam?
Last edited by SLP4CamaroSS; 07-24-2007 at 10:46 PM.
#17
TECH Senior Member
Originally Posted by N4cer
That sounds great! I know a great tuner in Lexington who specializes in LG cams, and he prefers the X2 over them all. I've love to see this Predator version with the LSK intake lobe. Also, has anybody ran Patrick G's donkey cam (G5X3 on LSK lobes)?
We all know A4s are not dyno queens
#20
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 00 Freak
I have buddy who made 400 rwhp with just headers and lid. No ported throttle body or pulley. He was also a a4 w/ 3500 stall. Oh yeah and his cam only.