Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Engine Builders, Cam Experts: Which is Smarter.. Cam Installed (+0) vs (+2) Advanced

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2008, 05:18 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
WeathermanShawn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Denver International Airport, Colorado USA
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Engine Builders, Cam Experts: Which is Smarter.. Cam Installed (+0) vs (+2) Advanced

Hi there.

First off, I have researched and used the search feature prior to asking the question.

I have read some interesting responses, but am interested in hearing the latest opinions and theories.

If I pick a cam that gives me the rights VE's, IVC, is there any inherent advantage or disadvantage in picking a cam that meets the desired DCR/Performance by just installing it "straight-up" (+0) advance?

I understand the concept of why so many cams are advanced, but are there any unique advantages to installing a cam say a 112 +2 vs 110 +0?

I realize this has been discussed and debated before. And, I am specifically referring to cam installation on higher CR Heads?

Anybody done it with success, and what was your thinking?

Not just a theoretical discussion, I have some specific goals in mind.

I know it is not the easiest concept one can answer, but I trust my fellow LS1Tech members will have some educated responses to share.

Thanks in advance..

..WeathermanShawn..
Old 06-05-2008, 07:12 PM
  #2  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
bad6as's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

a 112+2 and a 110+0 will still have some differant ves
Old 06-05-2008, 08:41 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
 
Old SStroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Install it exactly where it was designed to be installed. Your cam designer should be very specific as to where it will work best. If he/she is not, get a new cam person. I'm not a cam designer, but the good ones I know told me what I posted above.

Ah, but you asked for opinions, not facts. You should get a lot of those. You may be assuming too much.

Good luck!
Old 06-05-2008, 08:57 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
WeathermanShawn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Denver International Airport, Colorado USA
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the replies so far.

I'll always agree to follow the best advice. I'll take facts, opinions, etc.

Must be a few who found an advantage in just installing a cam "straight-up".

Slightly lower DCR, but I assume some difference in overlap between intake valve and exhaust valve might be to some advantage?

I know we are talking small differences, but any insight would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks.

..WeathermanShawn..
Old 06-06-2008, 04:35 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

You mention "higher compression heads" and should note that advancing will lower the PTV on the intake valve over cam installation on the "as designed" centerline. What ever you decide, make sure you measure your clearances. Too many guys seem to go by the edict "it clears". I still don't understand that statement.
Old 06-06-2008, 06:52 AM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (16)
 
Formulated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Valve events are valve events... You have to know what you want. The camshaft itself will only fix the intake and exhaust lobes, and the phasing of those lobes with respect to each other (Exhaust centerline, intake centerline, and valve overlap). Beyond sourcing that camshaft, you then need to determine how you want the valve events phased with respect to crank / piston position. That's where degreeing the cam becomes important. I see a lot of people put cams in there cars that only know if the cam was installed advanced, retarded, or straight up; they can't tell you what the intake centerline is though. Don't make that mistake.
Old 06-06-2008, 07:40 AM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

adding advance/retard won't do as much as changing the lsa. determine your goals first, as always..
Old 06-06-2008, 12:35 PM
  #8  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

In your example, the intake valve events are the same, but the exhaust valve events differ. By opening and closing the exhaust valve later, you add overlap and extend the power stroke before the exhaust valve opens. In some applications, this will increase torque, but it's really application specific.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:02 PM.