How much is "too little" PTVC?
#1
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How much is "too little" PTVC?
I just want to hear some ppl on here admit that they are running smaller than recommended PTVC (.080I, .100E)? I am at .080 on the intake after flycutting the I side but am at .080 also on the exhaust (no flycut), I would cut it a bit but do not have the correct size cutting tool, would/do you guys think .080 on the exhaust is ok? Heads are TEA stg 2 LS6 milled .020 2.04I and 1.57E valves, stock MLS gasket.
#2
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What is your Int. clearance? Exhaust is a little on the tight side, and about sure te intake is even worse.
.070+ min. int and .090+ min. exh. is what I shoot for, otherwise you go at your "own risk" and hope you stay off the rev limiter?
.070+ min. int and .090+ min. exh. is what I shoot for, otherwise you go at your "own risk" and hope you stay off the rev limiter?
#3
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Intaake is right where it should be at .080. If I could find the Isky flycutting tool asap for the exhaust I would cut it .030 deep but I have no clue where to get one
#5
#7
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yea I see what you are saying, I clayed it again and its a very small amount over .080, I would say .082 but I went ahead and put the heads on as I do not have a cutter to flycut the exhaust side. I measured my pushrod lenght and got 7.300 with no preload so I think I am going to order the 7.350's...
Trending Topics
#9
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
I've run .040" / .055" one time on my own car. While I don't at all think it's a good idea, I never had any issues with it. Your on the tight side of what guys like to see, but I doubt you have any problems.
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
#11
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rochester,Ny
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have never personally trusted the clay method.Instead i use the feeler gauges between the rocker and valve method.Much more accurate,if done properly.I would say you dont want your exhaust that tight is its an m6,if you miss a shift,and have a mechanical overrev,you may have a problem.The intake valve on the other hand is fine.I would just locate an isky tool and sleep better not worrying about the engine staying together,but thats just me.
#12
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
i have never personally trusted the clay method.Instead i use the feeler gauges between the rocker and valve method.Much more accurate,if done properly.I would say you dont want your exhaust that tight is its an m6,if you miss a shift,and have a mechanical overrev,you may have a problem.The intake valve on the other hand is fine.I would just locate an isky tool and sleep better not worrying about the engine staying together,but thats just me.
#13
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (28)
I would run .040 on a auto car.
Not on my m6 car. The syock cam/valvetrain had contact on a 2-3-2 so problems form it I even fly cut later). Also run a good valvespring, even more then needed, if your under good amount of room =.100
And watch the valvetrain weights (aftermarker "better" parts that weight a lot more then stock)
Not on my m6 car. The syock cam/valvetrain had contact on a 2-3-2 so problems form it I even fly cut later). Also run a good valvespring, even more then needed, if your under good amount of room =.100
And watch the valvetrain weights (aftermarker "better" parts that weight a lot more then stock)
#14
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
i have never personally trusted the clay method.Instead i use the feeler gauges between the rocker and valve method.Much more accurate,if done properly.I would say you dont want your exhaust that tight is its an m6,if you miss a shift,and have a mechanical overrev,you may have a problem.The intake valve on the other hand is fine.I would just locate an isky tool and sleep better not worrying about the engine staying together,but thats just me.
#15
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just bumping this thread to let everyone know how its been at those PTVC numbers. I have ran the car a couple times at the track with the rev limiter set to 7300, (I was trying to make 2 passes without having to shift into 4th gear, it did not help my time so I set it back down to 6700). Also I did the "3rd gear into 2nd gear" shift and saw my rpm gauge fly into the black zone on the gauge, I babied it home and thought the worst, I did a cyl leakdown test @ 90 psi on all cyl's amd had NO leakage other than the small normal air slipping past the rings into the crankcase. Also I have smacked the rev limiter a lot since then and its been great, I will however be changing the valve springs out after 15 or 20k miles. Also my numbers and 1/4 mile time on the set-up are below.