Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

L92 Setup Dilema

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-2009, 05:16 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Carlos_Garza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default L92 Setup Dilema

I'm swapping an L92 engine in to my 1999 Camaro Z28. I have a set of AFR 225 big bore heads and a FAST 92 intake and TB setup, that I was going to use on an LS1 engine I was going to built for my Camaro. A few days ago I was able to get a great deal on a L92 engine out of 2007 Cadillac escalade. I have 2 possible setup options for my 6.2 engine. Please let me know which one of the 2 you prefer and why.

Option 1:
Ported L92 heads
GMPP intake carb style with 92mm TB

Option 2:
AFR 225 big bore heads (2.08 intake and 1.60 exhaust valves)
FAST Intake with 92mm TB


thanks a lot for your help

Last edited by Carlos_Garza; 03-28-2009 at 06:44 PM.
Old 03-28-2009, 08:46 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (31)
 
sroach20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: houston, Texas
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Carlos_Garza
I'm swapping an L92 engine in to my 1999 Camaro Z28. I have a set of AFR 225 big bore heads and a FAST 92 intake and TB setup, that I was going to use on an LS1 engine I was going to built for my Camaro. A few days ago I was able to get a great deal on a L92 engine out of 2007 Cadillac escalade. I have 2 possible setup options for my 6.2 engine. Please let me know which one of the 2 you prefer and why.

Option 1:
Ported L92 heads
GMPP intake carb style with 92mm TB

Option 2:
AFR 225 big bore heads (2.08 intake and 1.60 exhaust valves)
FAST Intake with 92mm TB

thanks a lot for your help
make sure you get the right elbow for option 1, some of the low profile ones are restrictive. the better ones can cause fitment issues. might be better off going option 2 untill the fast l92 comes out.
Old 03-29-2009, 10:10 AM
  #3  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Carlos_Garza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I guess both are good options and if there was a better after market intake, option 1 would be the way to go... another thing I like about the AFR 225 FAST 92/92 setup is that I have more cam options...

Is there any one else out there with more feedback about both setups?

Last edited by Carlos_Garza; 03-29-2009 at 10:36 AM.
Old 03-30-2009, 04:16 PM
  #4  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Carlos_Garza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I sill have not made up my mind on what heads and intake to use... need more feedback please...

thanks
Old 03-30-2009, 05:24 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
onefastrx7turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Goodyear, az
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lol...when is the FAST L92 intake coming out and how much of my 401K will I have to cash to buy one?
Old 03-30-2009, 06:12 PM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

FWIW: I haven't seen super results using an elbow N/A with the L92 heads. A carb manifold with a carb style throttle body is the way to go if you've got the room. The FAST 102 may be the answer but it won't be out until late summer at best.

Just my $.02



Quick Reply: L92 Setup Dilema



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48 PM.