vic jr intake or fast 92
#2
On The Tree
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St.Charles, Illinois
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
here is my expierence with vic jr.... could not find the correct seals for the manifold anywhere.... not to say you could not use the paper but it is better to use orings. I had to machine the sides of the intake to fit on my L92's. The cast Elbow is not the best looking when you use an aftermarket TB. As far as performance, with more cubes and a cam above 600 you will make good power...... with out losing alot down low. Smaller Cubes you definatly lose torque. Both manifolds are good if i were to do it again i would buy the fast.
#3
I would consider the super victor on a 440 with a 4 barrel 4150 TB if you could get it to fit under the gto cowl and hood (or if you dont mind doing some modification).
It seems like the key to making power with a single plain is having a cam designed to take advantage of its strong points.
It seems like the key to making power with a single plain is having a cam designed to take advantage of its strong points.
#4
On The Tree
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wondered about this too, with all the talk about the fast manifolds only flowinga certain amount then leveling out. On a naturally aspirated motor, I would think the single plane would out perform the fast. But I'd be curious to see if it would work with smaller motors say 408-427ci?
Trending Topics
#11
FormerVendor
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: memphis, tn
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wouldn't say minimal gains if you get a cam setup for the vr jr. My car runs 130mph in the 1/4 n/a and it's built for nitrous.
I know i'm stressing my rods pretty bad, but I think with some rod bolts it will be a bit safer
I know i'm stressing my rods pretty bad, but I think with some rod bolts it will be a bit safer
#15
The 440 ls7 is actually in a c5. With tons of gas. We put a fast 90 that had been ported. Power flat lines at 6500 and pulls to 7100. I have all the right top end stuff jesel j2k's kmotion springs. cam is 251/259 .624/.624 113. We put mid 500's through the 4l60 and alot more on nitrous. I just feel there is more to get out of it. I trap in the 7000 range.
#16
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
The 440 ls7 is actually in a c5. With tons of gas. We put a fast 90 that had been ported. Power flat lines at 6500 and pulls to 7100. I have all the right top end stuff jesel j2k's kmotion springs. cam is 251/259 .624/.624 113. We put mid 500's through the 4l60 and alot more on nitrous. I just feel there is more to get out of it. I trap in the 7000 range.
#18
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry for ressurecting this baby from the dead BUT
I'm in the same boat as a few others I think. 408 motor, TFS 235 heads, big cam (258/262 .645/.645 112) and the car is making peak tq at 5500 and peak hp at 6300!!! Looking at the curve, it looks like it wants to keep pulling but falls off a bit and stays pretty level to 7000. I think my setup should be peaking around 7400. Obviously the FAST 90 is choking me. I'm debating on a Vic Jr with elbow or just pulling the trigger for the Super Vic and getting a 4" cowl. Which would be better?
I'm in the same boat as a few others I think. 408 motor, TFS 235 heads, big cam (258/262 .645/.645 112) and the car is making peak tq at 5500 and peak hp at 6300!!! Looking at the curve, it looks like it wants to keep pulling but falls off a bit and stays pretty level to 7000. I think my setup should be peaking around 7400. Obviously the FAST 90 is choking me. I'm debating on a Vic Jr with elbow or just pulling the trigger for the Super Vic and getting a 4" cowl. Which would be better?
Last edited by kjmdrumz3; 12-31-2009 at 03:20 AM.
#19
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Boggy Creek
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't put a elbow on NA applications! The elbow will act as a wall and will not let the air move into the plenum correctly to all the intake runners. With FI applications they work because the air is being forced into the runners.
If you have to run a elbow get the wilson and put a carb spacer on it. That one has the least arc or bend to it and the spacer will make it taller allowing the air more time to straighten up before entering the plenum,but the your still probably 30hp down from a 4150 throttle body setup. I have had both and the 4150 throttle body is night and day compared to the elbow setup on a NA application.
If you have to run a elbow get the wilson and put a carb spacer on it. That one has the least arc or bend to it and the spacer will make it taller allowing the air more time to straighten up before entering the plenum,but the your still probably 30hp down from a 4150 throttle body setup. I have had both and the 4150 throttle body is night and day compared to the elbow setup on a NA application.
#20
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the info. I just don't have the $$$ right now for a new hood. Was hoping that the Vic Jr would be enough of a pickup from the FAST to go ahead and do it. Guess I'll wait a little longer.