Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Stock L92's... PSI 1511ML, PAC 1518, or Patriot Golds?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-19-2010, 01:34 PM
  #1  
cam
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: in the garage
Posts: 3,389
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts

Default Stock L92's... PSI 1511ML, PAC 1518, or Patriot Golds?

I've been a big fan of the patriot golds but these are some big valves we're talking here and I'm looking at 600 lift, 222 intake redline of 6800 ( VVT engine ) so any builders have bad experiences with any of the above springs controlling L92 valves?
Old 02-19-2010, 01:40 PM
  #2  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (6)
 
AES Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Elk Grove Village IL
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Would recommend Patriot Gold or PAC has a new springs part number 1205 dual
Old 02-19-2010, 04:08 PM
  #3  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Those EPS lobes work superbly with premium beehives like the PAC 1518s. They're more expensive than the Comp 26918s, but I've never heard of a failure.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 02-19-2010, 04:58 PM
  #4  
cam
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: in the garage
Posts: 3,389
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Patrick G
Those EPS lobes work superbly with premium beehives like the PAC 1518s. They're more expensive than the Comp 26918s, but I've never heard of a failure.
Yeah I've read great things about the PAC's as well and havent been able to find a failure thread either BUT... Not many people I've found run them with the stock L92 valves either which are quite a bit heavier than the LS3 valves. So I thought I'd post up and see if anyone had bad experiences with controlling the L92 valves in particular?
Old 02-19-2010, 05:35 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
iTrader: (76)
 
BORN2FLY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hattiesburg (Camp Shelby), MS
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cam
Yeah I've read great things about the PAC's as well and havent been able to find a failure thread either BUT... Not many people I've found run them with the stock L92 valves either which are quite a bit heavier than the LS3 valves. So I thought I'd post up and see if anyone had bad experiences with controlling the L92 valves in particular?
I'll be able to tell you in a few day's myself, as i'm about to install a set of beehives on my G8's l92 heads that will be used with an EPS lobed 222/230.....but i'm also using light weight (5grams) titainium retainers and (2grams) locks on top of the beehives. Basically I reduced some weight off the heavy intake valve.
Old 02-19-2010, 05:55 PM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cam
Yeah I've read great things about the PAC's as well and havent been able to find a failure thread either BUT... Not many people I've found run them with the stock L92 valves either which are quite a bit heavier than the LS3 valves. So I thought I'd post up and see if anyone had bad experiences with controlling the L92 valves in particular?
I've been running PAC 1521's with stock L92 valves for the last 6-8k miles with .660 lift. The heads were just sent back to WCCH to get the new Stage 3 porting. Richard checked the springs and the specs were almost the same as when they were new. Under 5lb difference. Shawn at VA Speed tested the same thing on the springs before he sent the heads to Richard.

That help?
Old 02-19-2010, 06:05 PM
  #7  
cam
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: in the garage
Posts: 3,389
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WKMCD
I've been running PAC 1521's with stock L92 valves for the last 6-8k miles with .660 lift. The heads were just sent back to WCCH to get the new Stage 3 porting. Richard checked the springs and the specs were almost the same as when they were new. Under 5lb difference. Shawn at VA Speed tested the same thing on the springs before he sent the heads to Richard.

That help?
I've seen lots of positive reviews about the PAC's but very little feedback on the 1511ML but the reviews i have seen about the 1511ML are all RAVING about how great they are. Makes me want to try them but I like my info and the more the merrier!

Anyone know whats the price difference between the PSI's and the PAC's?
Old 02-21-2010, 11:23 AM
  #8  
cam
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: in the garage
Posts: 3,389
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

I've been running PAC 1521's with stock L92 valves for the last 6-8k miles with .660 lift. The heads were just sent back to WCCH to get the new Stage 3 porting. Richard checked the springs and the specs were almost the same as when they were new. Under 5lb difference. Shawn at VA Speed tested the same thing on the springs before he sent the heads to Richard.

That help?
Are those not BBC springs? Why not the 1518's?

Old 02-21-2010, 11:28 AM
  #9  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cam
Are those not BBC springs? Why not the 1518's?

The 1518 are single beehive springs. The 1521 are duals. Both drop in on LS engines.
Old 02-21-2010, 01:02 PM
  #10  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
LS1 BU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: South Elgin
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Going with Patriot golds with LSL lobes and stock valves.
Old 02-22-2010, 07:40 AM
  #11  
cam
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: in the garage
Posts: 3,389
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

Probably going to try the PAC beehives 1518's and go. I like the quiet aspect and its what the cam spec'r recommends. Im only worried about the huge weight of those valves... eeks
Old 02-22-2010, 10:02 AM
  #12  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 5,053
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

We've got the PAC 1518's in stock and ready to ship! Those are the ones I'd go with!
__________________


Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!

COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
Old 02-22-2010, 11:20 AM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cam
Probably going to try the PAC beehives 1518's and go. I like the quiet aspect and its what the cam spec'r recommends. Im only worried about the huge weight of those valves... eeks
The L92 valves are actually lighter than some aftermarket stainless valves. They are not a bad valve at all.
Old 02-22-2010, 11:30 AM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

The PSI 1511ML's are nice springs, however you will have to shim to get a high enough seat value to control those valves and you may find that there isn't enough lift once you do this. These springs have a slightly shorter free height so that at 1.800" installed height as I recall sets up at 120#. You would need to run the numbers and determine the setup height to achieve your required seat value and then use the bind height to see if you can handle the lift. I have used these springs a few times on lower lift setups with stock 241 heads and they have been excellent.

Last edited by vettenuts; 02-22-2010 at 06:16 PM.
Old 02-22-2010, 02:39 PM
  #15  
On The Tree
iTrader: (76)
 
BORN2FLY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hattiesburg (Camp Shelby), MS
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BORN2FLY
I'll be able to tell you in a few day's myself, as i'm about to install a set of beehives on my G8's l92 heads that will be used with an EPS lobed 222/230.....but i'm also using light weight (5grams) titainium retainers and (2grams) locks on top of the beehives. Basically I reduced some weight off the heavy intake valve.
Ok, after talking with several sponsors about upgrading to LS3 intake valves, they all assured me that it would be awaste of money for my goals, so I went ahead and installed the beehive springs w/titainium retainers and locks (install height checked and properly shimmed) onto my G8's L92 oem valves with the EPS endurance lobed cam @ 222/230 ~.597/.599<112+3 and so far....the valvetrain is super quite and revs so fast!!!!

Next up...super tune....
Old 02-22-2010, 07:52 PM
  #16  
Teching In
 
mark_p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Comp cams 921 with titanium retainers are top of the line if you ask me
Old 02-23-2010, 09:25 AM
  #17  
cam
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: in the garage
Posts: 3,389
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BORN2FLY
Ok, after talking with several sponsors about upgrading to LS3 intake valves, they all assured me that it would be awaste of money for my goals, so I went ahead and installed the beehive springs w/titainium retainers and locks (install height checked and properly shimmed) onto my G8's L92 oem valves with the EPS endurance lobed cam @ 222/230 ~.597/.599<112+3 and so far....the valvetrain is super quite and revs so fast!!!!

Next up...super tune....
Sounds promising thanks. How high do you take it up to?


How I typically operate is by adding safeguard redundancy to everything so I tend to avoid breakages. One spring just scares the **** out of me but then again... My truck has stock beehives as did the truck before it and no issues at all and quiet. The Patriot Golds on my LS1 were noisy but also flawless performers although I didnt put a ton of miles on them either.

Seeing as I cant find any bad press about the PAC's and all your good insight here fellas I think Im going to try them. Thanks again boys



By the way of course I will be verifying installed height, push rod length etc etc. No corner cutting here
Old 02-23-2010, 09:49 AM
  #18  
On The Tree
iTrader: (76)
 
BORN2FLY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hattiesburg (Camp Shelby), MS
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cam
Sounds promising thanks. How high do you take it up to?

How I typically operate is by adding safeguard redundancy to everything so I tend to avoid breakages. One spring just scares the **** out of me but then again... My truck has stock beehives as did the truck before it and no issues at all and quiet. The Patriot Golds on my LS1 were noisy but also flawless performers although I didnt put a ton of miles on them either.

Seeing as I cant find any bad press about the PAC's and all your good insight here fellas I think Im going to try them. Thanks again boys



By the way of course I will be verifying installed height, push rod length etc etc. No corner cutting here
Man, I'm only turning it up to 6600 rpm's MAX!!! I had a new set of Patriot Extreme Duals and the Beehives sitting there..... but I chose the beehives, because they would work just as well with my small EPS endurance lobe cam, which was designed around the use of beehives. But, I took other safety measures as well with the use of Titainium (5grams) retainers, (2grams) locks, the proper pushrod length and lifter preload.

But the way I look at is....even if a dual spring fails, there is a chance of you still damaging your engine. So at the end of the day....it's all about you setting up your combo to the right specifications and with the use of the correct parts.
Old 02-23-2010, 01:50 PM
  #19  
cam
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: in the garage
Posts: 3,389
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by See5
FWIW I weighed up some valves a while back:

Stock L92 intake-108.6 grams -- Some non magnetic alloy
Manley 11620 -119 grams- Intake- The Manleys are solid SS
Manley 11621-92 grams- Exh
LS3 intake -89 grams -- hollow alloy and my current favorite (NA) with single springs
LS3 exh same part# as L92 Exh- some non magnetic alloy
I found this info in the thread linked below.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...-not-good.html


I found a bunch of similar threads claiming that they "heard of" stock valves breaking in L92 heads... My money is on poor valve control or **** poor installation skills. Making me lean back towards the duals again LOL ayayayyyy this is rough haha
Old 02-25-2010, 03:26 PM
  #20  
cam
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: in the garage
Posts: 3,389
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

Yet another update to my quest for the best spring to run...

im running a VVT engine and I discovered some info that the stock GM VVT phaser has to work against spring pressure to properly adjust cam position and this makes spring selection CRUCIAL to performance. In fact at this point I've discovered a lot more bad info regarding the gm VVT function than good and its making me increasingly more concerned about how well this VVT system will work for my goals.

Considering MAST performance seems to be the only shop that has done the R&D on VVT cams and they run the PAC 1518 spring then this is the direction I am going to go at this point.

I know I've been back and forth and sideways here fellas but info is key and I like my info. Look before you leap is my philosophy when building stuff.

Thanks a ton for all the opinions. Firer away if you have anything else to add.



Quick Reply: Stock L92's... PSI 1511ML, PAC 1518, or Patriot Golds?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:12 PM.