Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Perfect Driveability LS3 Cam?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2012, 03:17 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
benno25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Perfect Driveability LS3 Cam?

Hi guys,

I'm thinking about putting a more daily driver friendly cam in my LS3 with the following mods.
1 3/4" extractors
twin 2.5" cat back exhaust
fast lsxr 102mm intake manifold
nick williams 102mm throttle body
comp dual valve springs, comp pushrods 7.4" and currently has a comp 227/243 cam.

I rarely rev the car over 6000-6500rpm, so power above this point is of no concern.
I would like it to have perfect or close to perfect street manners.

I also have 4.11:1 diff gears so don't really need heaps of torque down really low in the rev range.

What sort of cams would people recommend with the above requirements?

I'm currently looking at something like a Vengeance Racing stage 1 cam (223/231 115+3) or maybe a thunder racing TruTorq Level 1 cam (219/224 115)

Probably leaning against the smaller cam at this stage, as I don't see the need to give up torque at lower revs to gain a little over 6000rpm?

Thanks for the help
Benno
Old 06-07-2012, 06:31 AM
  #2  
ctd
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
ctd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sicamous, BC
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Here is cam test that may help you, I would suggest having a look @ Lingefelter's spec'd camshaft.

I've always run Cathedral heads so I've no camshaft LS3 experience, seems that LS3 heads make the cam choice very fussy as you are describing.

http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...son/index.html
Old 06-07-2012, 11:21 AM
  #3  
Teching In
 
gto_ua's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

get a 220/232* 116LSA+4* with no more than .600" lift.

you will be happy then!
Old 06-07-2012, 12:04 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
 
ringram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sunny London, UK
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

whats wrong with the current cam?
Maybe you need to check the tune out first?
Though it might be a tad too big. I like gto_ua spec cam.
Old 06-07-2012, 12:48 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (125)
 
94 guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ctd
Here is cam test that may help you, I would suggest having a look @ Lingefelter's spec'd camshaft.

I've always run Cathedral heads so I've no camshaft LS3 experience, seems that LS3 heads make the cam choice very fussy as you are describing.

http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...son/index.html
i have a brand new lingenfelter gt11 cam in the box forsale. it's the same cam in the test that did very well. pm me if your interested
Old 06-08-2012, 07:06 AM
  #6  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
benno25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ringram
whats wrong with the current cam?
Maybe you need to check the tune out first?
Though it might be a tad too big. I like gto_ua spec cam.
The current cam bucks and surges a lot, especially around 1600rpm and coupled with a shuddery clutch, makes it annoying to drive in traffic. This was never such an issue previously, however the car is now my daily drive, so I would prefer better driveability. I must just be getting old perhaps?! lol.

I am going to spend some time on the tune and see if it can be settled down a bit, so I will probably decide from there. I do really enjoy the current cam when going for a drive on the weekend or entering in motorkana's etc, however even then, I rarely rev it over 6000rpm much, so tend to think I may be better off with a smaller cam anyway?

Cheers
Benno
Old 06-08-2012, 07:56 AM
  #7  
ctd
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
ctd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sicamous, BC
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

If you are HPT & want to forward a log of the surge & buck as well as the tune file maybe I can see something. Shoot over a PM & will send you my email.

What is the LSA of your existing cam? Or do you know the overlap?
Old 06-08-2012, 08:09 AM
  #8  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
benno25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ctd
If you are HPT & want to forward a log of the surge & buck as well as the tune file maybe I can see something. Shoot over a PM & will send you my email.

What is the LSA of your existing cam? Or do you know the overlap?
I already have a tuner looking at it, I just need to spend some time over the weekend trying a few things. Thanks for the offer though.

Cam is 113lsa by the way. Its a comp lsr grind. Not sure of the overlap?

Cheers
Benno
Old 06-08-2012, 10:15 AM
  #9  
ctd
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
ctd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sicamous, BC
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Hopefully your tuner can sort out the kinks, I swapped out my cam as the buck & surge under 1800 rpm in lower gears was brutal. To many compromise's in the tuning for my liking.

I've a very good link that gets into some pretty good detail why the LS3's don't need big cams & what happens technically.
Old 06-08-2012, 03:07 PM
  #10  
Teching In
iTrader: (4)
 
mongoose z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: edmond, ok
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 94 guy
i have a brand new lingenfelter gt11 cam in the box forsale. it's the same cam in the test that did very well. pm me if your interested
I have that cam. It really does drive like stock. With the 4.11 gears it would drive even better than stock.
Old 06-08-2012, 05:18 PM
  #11  
TECH Regular
 
Dyno Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sounds more like a tune issue than anything!

I currently daily drive an LS3 in our Monaro with a Comp Cam, 231 239 .617 .624 113.
Old 06-09-2012, 07:12 AM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dyno Junkie
Sounds more like a tune issue than anything!

I currently daily drive an LS3 in our Monaro with a Comp Cam, 231 239 .617 .624 113.


FWIW: The best cam I ran in my 403 with WCCH Stage 2 heads was a 230-240 111+0. It made 530/480 and drove prefectly thanks to the spot on tune by Ed Hutchings.

The cam I run in the 427 now is not much different and either is the drivability. I can leave it in 6th gear on the highway and pull cleanly from 600RPM (yes, six hundred) when I get in traffic. Also thanks to the tune by Ed. That's even with a heavily modified FAST 102mm matched to a NW 107mm TB.

Old 06-09-2012, 05:47 PM
  #13  
LS6
TECH Regular
 
LS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cherry Hill, New Jersey State
Posts: 486
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

This must be almost perfect tune
My car is 4.0845" bore with 3.622" stroke with milled L92 heads (0.010"), stock LS3 intake and TB 102mm & LT headers (1 3/4") & cam of 227 / 239 LSA 114 + 0; after tuning it still surge at 1500 ~ 1800 rpm, but after that it suddenly jumps with a power that my tire start spining hard which i do not like it espically in town between trafic lights.

Your cam is very powerfull to get over 500 rwhp & 480 rwtq
Old 06-09-2012, 11:14 PM
  #14  
TECH Junkie
 
1989GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

"currently has a comp 227/243 cam"

IMHO that 16 degree split between the intake and exhaust duration is the reason it does not drive all that well. I would knock some duration off the exhaust side and I bet the driveability will increase quite abit and make it easier to tune.
Old 06-10-2012, 06:25 AM
  #15  
ctd
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
ctd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sicamous, BC
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by LS6
This must be almost perfect tune

after tuning it still surge at 1500 ~ 1800 rpm, but after that it suddenly jumps with a power that my tire start spining hard which i do not like it espically in town between trafic lights.
Your serious?
Old 06-10-2012, 10:32 AM
  #16  
LS6
TECH Regular
 
LS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cherry Hill, New Jersey State
Posts: 486
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'm planning to travel to a tuner who is good and dyno the car, to fine tune the engine. The vaccum for the braks is very poor which affect the breaking, i think it is from cam
Old 06-10-2012, 05:26 PM
  #17  
TECH Regular
 
Dyno Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LS6
I'm planning to travel to a tuner who is good and dyno the car, to fine tune the engine. The vaccum for the braks is very poor which affect the breaking, i think it is from cam
Something is wrong there!

However I don't think it is the cam.
Your cam is similar to mine if not a little smaller.
In fact I was very surprised, if not a little disappointed, how smooth our LS3 drove. I expected it to be a lot lumpier at idle than our old LS1 fitted with a Speed Inc Comp Cam 228 228 .588 .588 13, however it was almost identical.
Old 06-10-2012, 08:55 PM
  #18  
Mez
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Mez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mongoose z28
I have that cam. It really does drive like stock. With the 4.11 gears it would drive even better than stock.
I also have the Lingenfelter GT11 cam on my LS2. It was originally designed for the LS1 which has a smaller bore so the high lift gets the valve out the way.

For the LS3, I believe there are better choices available today. Something in the range of ~220° intake and ~230° with lift in the .600" range and 111° + 3°. You don't need a big overlap cam anymore to have a fast car. A big overlap cam usually is the cause of surging at 1600 rpm. Who wants that?

Sure, the big overlap cams will show nice peak dyno numbers everybody likes to brag about but if you look closely at the torque curves, most of these cams suck in the 3500-5500 rpm range where you spend 90% of the time during WOT acceleration runs. What this means you can jump out to a comfortable lead and hold it over a car that makes more peak HP at 6500 rpm. A big, flat torque curve is preferred over one that peaks at a high RPM.

Peak HP means nothing in my book.
Old 06-11-2012, 09:27 AM
  #19  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
futureuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm running the Vengeance stage 2 with great success. Very nice street manners, it can lope along at 1200rpm, idle 850. Big flat torque curve with no dips and peak hp by 6000. With this cam they made 470 to the wheels in a setup like yours without the fast.
Old 06-11-2012, 02:37 PM
  #20  
LS6
TECH Regular
 
LS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cherry Hill, New Jersey State
Posts: 486
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My engine broke
The tuner discovered that the tuning was made in very bad way. The A/F ratio was made 11.1 till 1600rpm, then after 1600rpm it is 12.8.
Also, when trying to tune it, the engine started very unusual way, after that cooling water start to go low level and heat start raising very dramatically, however there is no leak observed. It was decided to teardown the engine after detailed inspection that didn't revealed any source of leak.
We discovered that the cylinder wall thickness between two sleeves observed of cracks in three location that water cooling is leaking to the oiling system. The tuner says it is knocking the engine expirenced.
It is very bad. Now im looking for new iron block.


Quick Reply: Perfect Driveability LS3 Cam?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 AM.