Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

tfs 235 with ls7 head gasket?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2009, 10:22 AM
  #1  
TJ
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
TJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: pensacola fl
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default tfs 235 with ls7 head gasket?

called trick flow. was told the bore isnt going to work on a 6.0 MLS gasket and a 235 head, that i needed to use a ls7 head gasket.
TEA told me not to use the ls7 headgasket. as mentioned the water ports are different.

can anyone give me input. already wasted money on a set of 6.0 gaskets, dont need to do it again.
Old 01-05-2009, 05:21 PM
  #2  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
ls2 bait's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in your closet
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

fel pro gaskets or cometic. they have a 4.125 bore gasket for the ls1.
Old 01-05-2009, 06:37 PM
  #3  
TJ
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
TJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: pensacola fl
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

trying to stay on the budget side if its ever possible with a build like this.
i just dont understand why the two companies would give me different answers.
the guy at trick flow just fumbled the gm part # for the ls7 gasket right out. didnt even have to look for it. said i would be fine.
engine business gets confusing sometimes, even when you get an asnwer you think you wanted to hear.
Old 01-05-2009, 06:41 PM
  #4  
CNB
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
CNB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: DFW
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I run the LS7 head gasket with TFS 235 and no problems. The holes are only slightly off.
Old 01-05-2009, 06:43 PM
  #5  
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Tom@SpeedInc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

1 hole is slightly off on LS7 gasket, i'd rather use a cometic or Fel Pro 1161 gasket 4.100" gasket bore
Old 01-05-2009, 06:46 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
SIC LSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bossier city,LA barksdale AFB
Posts: 5,353
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

So the bore are 4.030 and the head is 4.100 and they say use LS7 4.150 and fel pro gaskets or cometic. they have a 4.125 bore. So looks to me Ls7 or fel pro or cometic would be fine. I would get fel pro or cometic. Any one else???
Old 01-05-2009, 06:52 PM
  #7  
TJ
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
TJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: pensacola fl
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Fraser@SpeedInc
1 hole is slightly off on LS7 gasket, i'd rather use a cometic or Fel Pro 1161 gasket 4.100" gasket bore
why would you choose the felpro and cometic over GM?
thanks!
Old 01-05-2009, 06:58 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
SIC LSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bossier city,LA barksdale AFB
Posts: 5,353
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Sound's like the reason they say not to use them is 1 hole is slightly off and some people dont want to chance it and get something they know is 100% right.

Yes the ls7 will work, but with the whole being off i would think there is a chance for it to blow?
Old 01-05-2009, 07:44 PM
  #9  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
ls2 bait's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in your closet
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TJ
why would you choose the felpro and cometic over GM?
thanks!

fel pro make s a nice gasket. id use them if it were me.
Old 01-06-2009, 10:47 AM
  #10  
Restricted User
iTrader: (43)
 
2001 Pewter WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I run the Cometic 4.166 gasket as per TEA.
Old 01-07-2009, 08:08 AM
  #11  
LS1Tech Sponsor
 
TrickFlowTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

First of all I did not fumble for the the part number. I gave you the GM part number that we used in testing on our dyno, which is the LS7 gasket. I also gave you that part number yesterday when you PM'd me. Certain companies have their opinion. You asked what we recommended and I told you what would work.

Originally Posted by TJ
trying to stay on the budget side if its ever possible with a build like this.
i just dont understand why the two companies would give me different answers.
the guy at trick flow just fumbled the gm part # for the ls7 gasket right out. didnt even have to look for it. said i would be fine.
engine business gets confusing sometimes, even when you get an asnwer you think you wanted to hear.
__________________
http://www.trickflow.com/emain.asp
Click Above for Product Information
Old 01-07-2009, 11:18 AM
  #12  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (13)
 
Brian Tooley Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

The problem is not with the head, it's with the block that is used.

The GM LS7 gasket will not work on a 6.0L iron block, it blocks off half of the water holes.

The GM LS7 gasket will work on an LSX block and the LS7 block.

Which block do you have?
Old 01-07-2009, 11:28 AM
  #13  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (128)
 
SSwanner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Meridian, MS
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

tj, it may not be perfect but i got 6L GM gaskets on mine :yup:
Old 01-07-2009, 12:35 PM
  #14  
TJ
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
TJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: pensacola fl
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by TrickFlowTech
First of all I did not fumble for the the part number. I gave you the GM part number that we used in testing on our dyno, which is the LS7 gasket. I also gave you that part number yesterday when you PM'd me. Certain companies have their opinion. You asked what we recommended and I told you what would work.
maybe fumble was not a correct word. but you called out the # like you knew it off the top of your head. ?
what block did you use in testing?
thank you for your recommendation. its always good to get 3 or 4 people to give you advice, then make your own desicsion from what you have learned.
not trying to start any arguements or bashing one company from the next, id just like some advice.
Old 01-07-2009, 12:38 PM
  #15  
TJ
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
TJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: pensacola fl
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Brian Tooley
The problem is not with the head, it's with the block that is used.

The GM LS7 gasket will not work on a 6.0L iron block, it blocks off half of the water holes.

The GM LS7 gasket will work on an LSX block and the LS7 block.

Which block do you have?
i have a 6.0 factory production block.

would an l92 gasket be a good choice? it has a 4.094 bore measured.
id rather not use a cometic.
Old 01-07-2009, 12:40 PM
  #16  
TJ
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
TJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: pensacola fl
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by SSwanner
tj, it may not be perfect but i got 6L GM gaskets on mine :yup:
the gasket is only 4.03x. the head i believe is 4.100.
not sure what effect this has on performance or longevity.
Old 01-07-2009, 12:44 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,888
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TJ
i have a 6.0 factory production block.

would an l92 gasket be a good choice? it has a 4.094 bore measured.
id rather not use a cometic.
u measured the l92 head gasket a 4.094 bore?
what is the rated compressed thickness? if u know
Old 01-07-2009, 12:46 PM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,888
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

iirc, the 6.0 mls is 4.045 bore .055 compressed.
i thought the l92 was 4.100+ .053 compressed.
what is the ls7 bore and compressed?
Old 01-07-2009, 12:55 PM
  #19  
TJ
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
TJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: pensacola fl
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by NemeSS
iirc, the 6.0 mls is 4.045 bore .055 compressed.
i thought the l92 was 4.100+ .053 compressed.
what is the ls7 bore and compressed?
i have measured a 6.0 gasket at 4.036 myself.
i have read several threads where the l92 gasket is 4.080 "max bore"
i had someone measure one and it came out 4.090. another member here posted up it measured 4.094. depending on the gasket, or the mic, im sure some of them are 4.100. the difference there is minimal.
ls7 gasket is 4.150. i dont know specifics on the compressed. only what ive seen posted.
.051-.054
Old 01-07-2009, 01:03 PM
  #20  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (13)
 
Brian Tooley Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TJ
the gasket is only 4.03x. the head i believe is 4.100.
not sure what effect this has on performance or longevity.
I was faced with the same delimma on my 6.0L iron block, I bought the LS7 gaskets and found they wouldn't work. I had to bite the bullet and buy Cometic.

TFS also sells the gaskets you need.


Quick Reply: tfs 235 with ls7 head gasket?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 PM.