Generation IV External Engine LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Truck Intake vs Car Intake performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-11-2011, 01:24 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Later-A-body's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Truck Intake vs Car Intake performance

I am in the process of building a 440 ERL based motor for my Pontiac. I am interested in using a truck intake for added low end response and overall torque production. I am curious to know if there have been any comparison test's performed to show the difference in power of the truck vs car intake. I do not wish the engine to make power past 62-6400. Are there any drawbacks to the truck intake. I believe I have enough hood clearance to run it. A FAST 102mm intake is too expensive, plus I would like to run a factory TBSS engine cover.

Last edited by Later-A-body; 06-11-2011 at 01:42 AM.
Old 06-11-2011, 01:35 AM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
SHovV's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Rockport, TX
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

fast makes a truck intake also. if you have the room, run it. ive read/researched that the truck intakes have a better intake runner path to the heads
Old 06-11-2011, 01:46 AM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Later-A-body's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would like to save the $900 and invest it somewhere else. I should mention that this will be running ported LS3 heads.
Old 06-11-2011, 02:55 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (177)
 
Jimmy P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I am in the process of building a 440 ERL based motor for my Pontiac.
I dont know what your goals for the car are, but a stock intake will choke that 440 ERL..The FAST 102's are supposed to provide plenty of low end torque due to the increased runner lengh.
Old 06-11-2011, 07:10 AM
  #5  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
71novaguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i do believe car craft did a test on this a few years ago, and it showed the truck manifold made more power than alot of aftermarket units.
Old 06-12-2011, 10:58 AM
  #6  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
rojs234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sparta, Mo. in southwest Missouri
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Later-A-body
I am in the process of building a 440 ERL based motor for my Pontiac. I am interested in using a truck intake for added low end response and overall torque production. I am curious to know if there have been any comparison test's performed to show the difference in power of the truck vs car intake. I do not wish the engine to make power past 62-6400. Are there any drawbacks to the truck intake. I believe I have enough hood clearance to run it. A FAST 102mm intake is too expensive, plus I would like to run a factory TBSS engine cover.
If you will do some searching, there is a thread on this forum I believe that covers exactly what you are wanting to know. Maybe someone else can remember the name of the thread? The one I remember had air flow numbers and I'm almost certain dyno numbers.

Found this thread: *l92/L76 Intake Manifold Flow Comparison* by *Richard@WCCH* who is one of the sponsors on this forum.

Last edited by rojs234; 06-12-2011 at 11:18 AM.
Old 06-12-2011, 12:43 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
3YLSYKR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good questions.
Old 06-24-2011, 07:11 PM
  #8  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (35)
 
ramairroughneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Atoka,OK
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Check out Mast Motorsports websight. They have engine dyno charts with both intakes. If you study them close you'll see the truck intake has better bottom and topend. Also Comp cams commented in a vvt article that the truck intake is slightly better. This surprised me as I had seen the flowchart from the thread mentioned above and it clearly shows the car intake flowing better. I guess flow numbers aren't everything.
Old 06-24-2011, 07:31 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

You are building an ERL 440 stroker but a fast intake is too expensive....?
Old 06-24-2011, 07:51 PM
  #10  
Launching!
 
briancb1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fbodyjunkie06
You are building an ERL 440 stroker but a fast intake is too expensive....?
^^ Ditto.

I understand making a budget, I'm an M.E. - it all comes down to the dollar when creating a design. But you will most likely have investing in parts that will not live to their potential especially with your engine size.

That being said, it seems you potentially wasted money in other areas now... Its all a system as you already know, but I hope you dont neglect. Just food for thought......
Old 06-25-2011, 08:01 AM
  #11  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
2xLS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fbodyjunkie06
You are building an ERL 440 stroker but a fast intake is too expensive....?
I think maybe you missed this post

Originally Posted by Later-A-body
I would like to save the $900 and invest it somewhere else
He didn't feel the gain, if there is any,from the intake was worth the money
Old 06-27-2011, 12:50 AM
  #12  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Later-A-body's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't see why it is surprise that I am looking for information on these manifolds. Yes, I am building an ERL motor, but does not mean I just throw $900 at FAST for an intake. I am doing my research and asking questions of people that have more experience with the LS motor than I do. Since I am not at the stage yet to purchase an intake, I am gathering info beforehand. If a production LS3 intake would be better, then it would make more sense to buy one of them used, and save the money for other items. This is my first LS motor build, not the first motor I have built. Thanks.
Old 06-27-2011, 11:20 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,886
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

any oe intakewill be a severe restriction on that engine.
its either a fast or a holley plenum intake (if they ever come out)
Old 06-28-2011, 07:16 AM
  #14  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (35)
 
ramairroughneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Atoka,OK
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Is a Fast going to make more power before 6200-6400 rpms? Is a fast going to make more power period? I would think the High Ram would but It sounds like its out of the powerband the OP is looking for.
Old 07-16-2011, 10:20 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
 
s/c'd cav's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: phx , az
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

fast are WAY over rated , their first intakes with wilson were their best

you could look at the edelbrock pro-flow intake as well
Old 07-17-2011, 09:01 PM
  #16  
Launching!
 
briancb1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What car is this going into?
Old 07-18-2011, 12:54 AM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Zerokube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i may have a tbss ls2 intake for sale. make an offer if interested
Old 07-18-2011, 05:05 AM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
 
06Sierra2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: el paso, tx
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by s/c'd cav
fast are WAY over rated , their first intakes with wilson were their best

you could look at the edelbrock pro-flow intake as well
you really think fast is way over rated? i mean as for the truck intake it gained 15 hp peak over the ls6 manifold and gained across the board as a whole...people spend 300 hundred dollars on cold air intakes all the time and 200 on udp's for what 5-10 hp gains?
Old 07-18-2011, 06:58 AM
  #19  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
BADD SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baldwin, NY
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 06Sierra2
you really think fast is way over rated? i mean as for the truck intake it gained 15 hp peak over the ls6 manifold and gained across the board as a whole...people spend 300 hundred dollars on cold air intakes all the time and 200 on udp's for what 5-10 hp gains?
the 102's? without a doubt.....


90/92's were great, and when ported right were pretty awesome..... And I dont mean ported by a regular vendor churning them out like donuts...
Old 07-18-2011, 09:34 PM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
 
s/c'd cav's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: phx , az
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 06Sierra2
you really think fast is way over rated? i mean as for the truck intake it gained 15 hp peak over the ls6 manifold and gained across the board as a whole...people spend 300 hundred dollars on cold air intakes all the time and 200 on udp's for what 5-10 hp gains?
yup its a WAY over priced piece of plastic

udp's are worthless too , which is why the 1 on my 04 wont be going back on with the new motor , ill be glad to enjoy the wonders of a/c at idle again , lol


Quick Reply: Truck Intake vs Car Intake performance



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 PM.