Bolt on 98 T/A vs 07 gt
09-28-2011, 09:42 AM
#1
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: hendersonville,tn
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bolt on 98 T/A vs 07 gt Finally made it to the track to race my buddy here's the results.
1998 trans am (mods is Sig) 2007 GT (STOCK)
.3421 REACTION. .2220
2.0511 60 ft 2.3599
5.6460 330 ft 6.3989
8.0179 594 ft. 9.0099
8.5508. 1/8 et. 9.5889
84.44. 1/8 mph. 77.73
1998 trans am (mods is Sig) 2007 GT (STOCK)
.3421 REACTION. .2220
2.0511 60 ft 2.3599
5.6460 330 ft 6.3989
8.0179 594 ft. 9.0099
8.5508. 1/8 et. 9.5889
84.44. 1/8 mph. 77.73
09-28-2011, 10:09 AM
#4
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: hendersonville,tn
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Damn I thought he was doing pretty good , what should he be running? I know his 60 ft is ****. Also is my Sig not showing up because I'm posting from mobile ?
Trending Topics
09-29-2011, 12:45 AM
#8
Staging Lane
first thing first: track elevation, temp, and humidity? IE, what was the DA when you guys ran?
No matter how you look at it he got stomped, but damn even taking out the bad launch that thing should have done a bit better IMO. Not alot, but maybe a couple tenths better.
No matter how you look at it he got stomped, but damn even taking out the bad launch that thing should have done a bit better IMO. Not alot, but maybe a couple tenths better.
09-29-2011, 10:01 AM
#9
Launching!
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not calling you a liar stopsign32v but I haven't seen any basically stock mustang run in the 8's in my area that is with the exception of cobras gt500 and roush. There was a mach 1 I seen at the 1/8th mile bout a month ago with headers w/ cutouts and cai, Ran I think at best was 8.9 and a 04 gt w/cutouts headers underdrive pulley cai 3.73s ran a 9.4 so im a little lost but mustangs aren't up to par. How fast do you guys think a these 07's are they have 300bhp and are pigs ,1000 pounds heavier. Stock to stock the ls1 would still win that race, I have beatin a couple stock 05-2010's in my lt1. I would say that mustang is at best a 9.0 with a average sixty foot if 2.0
09-29-2011, 10:06 AM
#10
Teching In
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Rolla, Missouri
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not calling you a liar stopsign32v but I haven't seen any basically stock mustang run in the 8's in my area that is with the exception of cobras gt500 and roush. There was a mach 1 I seen at the 1/8th mile bout a month ago with headers w/ cutouts and cai, Ran I think at best was 8.9 and a 04 gt w/cutouts headers underdrive pulley cai 3.73s ran a 9.4 so im a little lost but mustangs aren't up to par. How fast do you guys think a these 07's are they have 300bhp and are pigs ,1000 pounds heavier. Stock to stock the ls1 would still win that race, I have beatin a couple stock 05-2010's in my lt1. I would say that mustang is at best a 9.0 with a average sixty foot if 2.0
09-29-2011, 10:13 AM
#11
Not calling you a liar stopsign32v but I haven't seen any basically stock mustang run in the 8's in my area that is with the exception of cobras gt500 and roush. There was a mach 1 I seen at the 1/8th mile bout a month ago with headers w/ cutouts and cai, Ran I think at best was 8.9 and a 04 gt w/cutouts headers underdrive pulley cai 3.73s ran a 9.4 so im a little lost but mustangs aren't up to par. How fast do you guys think a these 07's are they have 300bhp and are pigs ,1000 pounds heavier. Stock to stock the ls1 would still win that race, I have beatin a couple stock 05-2010's in my lt1. I would say that mustang is at best a 9.0 with a average sixty foot if 2.0
This was my first time ever running a Mach 1 at the track. Mods were O/R H pipe, catback, and shifter. (as stock as I could get, it was bought that way). Had I gotta a couple more runs, maybe 12's.
Last edited by Stopsign32v; 09-29-2011 at 11:43 AM.
09-29-2011, 10:29 AM
#12
Launching!
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stock the mach 1 does have more hp and is lighter with a bigger gear ratio but from my experience any gt mustang with the exception of fox bodies are pigs they never have had more them 300 bhp and they are heavy. As for the mach 1 I seen compared to yours I think the one a seen needs a major driver mod.
09-29-2011, 12:28 PM
#15
I feel a stock 07 GT should run around a 8.5-8.7 I think it would be hard to get a 8.4. But this is only me going by my gut feeling and what I've seen and read. I have no first hand experience.
09-29-2011, 01:07 PM
#16
Teching In
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Fort Smith, AR
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
a friend has a bolt-on 05 or 06 GT that ran a 10.38 in the 1000foot with slicks pulled one of the front wheels off the ground. I dont know anay more about the run. stock he ran a 11.01 in the 1000foot.
09-30-2011, 01:30 AM
#18
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not calling you a liar stopsign32v but I haven't seen any basically stock mustang run in the 8's in my area that is with the exception of cobras gt500 and roush. There was a mach 1 I seen at the 1/8th mile bout a month ago with headers w/ cutouts and cai, Ran I think at best was 8.9 and a 04 gt w/cutouts headers underdrive pulley cai 3.73s ran a 9.4 so im a little lost but mustangs aren't up to par. How fast do you guys think a these 07's are they have 300bhp and are pigs ,1000 pounds heavier. Stock to stock the ls1 would still win that race, I have beatin a couple stock 05-2010's in my lt1. I would say that mustang is at best a 9.0 with a average sixty foot if 2.0
09-30-2011, 01:58 AM
#19
Staging Lane
different days, different tracks, different drivers: let's just say, that for a any pre 2011 Mustang GT to beat a LS1 Fbody whether stock to stock, or bolton to bolton, the Fbody driver would have to screw up pretty bad. period. Which happens, unfortunately, all the time. And for the normal bolton GT to beat a stock LS1, they better be well thought out boltons.