PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

If I change the cylinder volume for a 427 from a 346 will it make me go lean or rich?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-11-2012, 11:00 AM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Bill00Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: West Palm Beach, Fl
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default If I change the cylinder volume for a 427 from a 346 will it make me go lean or rich?

My car was tuned a long time ago but I noticed the cylinder volume was still set using the 346. I wanted to know how to adjust the VE table. Thanks
Old 02-29-2012, 12:40 PM
  #2  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
bad6as's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Wondering as well
Old 02-29-2012, 01:19 PM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

No, afaik that is just an arbitrary number and doesn't get taken into account in the tune.
Old 02-29-2012, 01:34 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
 
joecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: So.Cal.
Posts: 6,077
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Remember that the PCM uses the MAF and/or VE to compute the cylinder fill airmass (i.e. does not use the cylinder volume).
Old 03-01-2012, 09:44 AM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I was under the impression that it was taken into account at least on ve calculations. I remember GB talking about changing it rather than rescaling injectors in his dvd when trying to avoid some limitation in the ecu. Disclamer: never tried it, just what I recall from the Banish dvd.
Old 03-01-2012, 01:06 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Theoretically speaking, increasing cylinder mass would predict more air being moved, thus add more fuel.
Old 03-02-2012, 12:25 AM
  #7  
8 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (32)
 
Blown06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,181
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

So can we confirm that the factory ecm does or doesnt use the cylinder volume number when calculating fuel?
Old 03-02-2012, 07:56 AM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

I was under the impression that it was taken into account at least on ve calculations.
Nope, VE is VE regardless of the displacement parameter.

Theoretically speaking, increasing cylinder mass would predict more air being moved, thus add more fuel.
The tune does not just predict more fuel than is in the VE table, so whatever the VE table is that's what the PCM is predicting...whether the displacement says 2 liters or 20. Changing the displacement parameter does not change the VE table accordingly.
Old 03-02-2012, 10:53 AM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Apparently it depends on the ecu. Got confirmation from GB that in some earlier years where the ve table is in percent ve rather than gmve it is a critical part of the calculations. When they switched to gmve it became obsolete and was thought to no longer be a part of the calculations.
Old 03-02-2012, 02:46 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Looks like the first year I could find for the switch was 2005. From GB's description, the units in VE on the old system were in the 100's with the %VE tables (where cylinder volume matters) and then the GMVE numbers are in the 1000's (where cylinder volume is no longer important). So hope that clears this up for some folks.

Back to the OP, I am not sure what year ECU you have, but by them leaving the number at 346, that may be the tuner's method of scaling down the injectors in order to avoid hitting a hard limit in the ECU. You can probably tell by looking at the injector scaling.
Old 03-02-2012, 03:54 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
 
joecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: So.Cal.
Posts: 6,077
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Sarg
Looks like the first year I could find for the switch was 2005. From GB's description, the units in VE on the old system were in the 100's with the %VE tables (where cylinder volume matters) and then the GMVE numbers are in the 1000's (where cylinder volume is no longer important). So hope that clears this up for some folks.

Back to the OP, I am not sure what year ECU you have, but by them leaving the number at 346, that may be the tuner's method of scaling down the injectors in order to avoid hitting a hard limit in the ECU. You can probably tell by looking at the injector scaling.
The VE display units are tuning software specific...

e.g. HPT displays the 1998-2008 GenIII VE tables in % units, EFILive can display the same years as either % or g*K/kPa (aka gmve).

In any of these tunes if you change the cylinder volume parameter, there is no change in fueling that can be seen on a running engine.
Old 03-02-2012, 04:04 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Just what GB said on the hptuner forums. I will quote his post here in a few...or you can go look it up. I'll let you argue it with him if you want.
Old 03-02-2012, 04:32 PM
  #13  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Like I said, just what Greg Banish said...he has WAY more experience than I do, so I listen

Originally Posted by eficalibrator
It plays a HUGE role on determining cyl_air in speed density on the older systems. Newer systems retained the value for reference as a placeholder, but it really doesn't do anything. The way to tell is check and see if the units in your VE table are "% VE" or "GMVE". The older %VE (numbers typically 0-100ish) versions must multiply by the cylinder volume to get an actual airmass. When they switched to GMVE (numbers 1000-2000ish), the volume got baked into the numbers in the GMVE table, so the reference value scalar became redundant as far as fueling is concerned.
http://www.hptuners.com/forum/showthread.php?t=38034
Old 03-05-2012, 01:24 PM
  #14  
Restricted User
 
MJEngineering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have messed with my displacement. Doesn't make a difference in closed loop but open loop fueling changes based on displacement. (09373372 OS)
Old 03-05-2012, 09:23 PM
  #15  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

So who here is smarter than Greg Bandish?



Quick Reply: If I change the cylinder volume for a 427 from a 346 will it make me go lean or rich?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06 AM.