Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

The longer the connecting rods, the more RPM I could rev ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-2012, 12:51 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
camaro-coz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: right next to the neighbours
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default The longer the connecting rods, the more RPM I could rev ?

I know it's a weird question ....

I have an H/C LS1 347 , patriot heads and a 111LSA cam, stock gm ls1 crankshaft , 6.200 compstar rods and Diamond -2cc 3.905 pistons , It's on a M6 T/A WS6 putting down 470rwhp N/A , 780rwhp on 1st stage and 870rwhp on 1st+second stage. It's a daily use street car. As you know the motor have a 6.200 rods which is a longer rod than the stock ones , and the usual rods which is the 6.125. My question is , does the rods effect the RPM ? I mean the longer the rod the more rpm you can rev ? Can I push my car to 7000rpm and then shift without any risk? can my diamond pistons stand that kind of rpm ? as you know it's a nitrous car so I'm trying to go with max power...

Here's some answers I recieved until now ....

A friend : yes , with 6.200 rods, you can go even more than 7000rpm safely.

Another friend: with those 6.200 rods , you can't rev up to 7000rpm , but with a longer rod , the only difference is the RPM's accelerates faster 'more torque'

The 3rd friend: It's up to the tuner , you could get you'r car tuned to push you'r motor down to 7000rpm , the diamond pistons handle's this kind of power.

Waiting for you'r feedback
Old 03-27-2012, 01:10 AM
  #2  
Teching In
 
lsxdreamin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Navarre florida
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

All depends on tuner you would probably have to run race fuels to push it that hard but it all depends on the tune I would think and your air flow
Old 03-27-2012, 01:21 AM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
camaro-coz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: right next to the neighbours
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The race fuel should'nt be a problem , I have 12 gallons of the C16's
but the problem is , I'm in kuwait and our tuners sux!
is there a way to contact some tuners from the US , pay them through the credit card and send me the tunning files ?

believe me , with tuners at kuwait , you can no more use the A/C after tunning the car using a 114 LSA or under cams ) they sux XD
Old 03-27-2012, 05:23 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
 
RezinTexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

there is less than 1% difference in piston speed and acceleration at a given RPM with the 6.1 vs the 6.2 rods.

if you're trying to reduce piston speed and/or acceleration at a given RPM, you need to reduce the stroke.
Old 03-27-2012, 06:17 AM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
camaro-coz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: right next to the neighbours
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thank you for you'r reply , appreciate it
Old 03-28-2012, 03:26 AM
  #6  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
camaro-coz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: right next to the neighbours
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

anyone ?
Old 03-28-2012, 04:17 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
BigRich954RR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

any one what ? your 6.2 rods make almost no diff or change
Old 03-28-2012, 04:22 AM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
 
joecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: So.Cal.
Posts: 6,077
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Rod length doesn't make much difference to piston speed and acceleration, and so it doesn't limit rpm;

stroke makes a huge difference in PS and PA and is what limits rpm;

rod length reduces the thrust angle and thrust loading which reduces cylinder wear and friction.

The things that limit rpm are stroke and reciprocating mass.
Old 03-28-2012, 10:56 AM
  #9  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (21)
 
Bilster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

More rod length reduces side loading or friction within an engine but how dramatically you have reduced friction is measured by where you began. Not much of a friction reduction between 6.1 and 6.2. Therefore not much to assist your rev capability. As joecar and RezinTexas suggest, you will see more "revability" by reducing your stroke. Just an FYI, with increase in revs demands more attention to the integrity of your valve train.
Old 03-28-2012, 01:02 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
 
joecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: So.Cal.
Posts: 6,077
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Yes, I agree with Bilster, valvetrain stability would limit rpm well before stroke and reciprocating mass unless carefully designed.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:45 PM.