Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

best valve combo for turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-2012, 09:13 AM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
5.3swap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: midland michigan
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default best valve combo for turbo

please some one chime in and help find out what the best valve diameter is for my heads. they are at the machine shop right now waiting on me to tell them what size i want.

thank you
Old 09-29-2012, 10:57 AM
  #2  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
JRENIGAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: 72396
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

And what heads would that be? Casting #'s and setup would help.
Old 09-29-2012, 01:33 PM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (50)
 
oange ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

no reason to get wrapped up in valve sizes. You can step up to a 2.00" intakevalve if you want. Bigger valves would be shrouded by the small bore anyway.
Old 09-29-2012, 02:45 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (8)
 
quicksilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marietta, Ga.
Posts: 3,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by oange ss
no reason to get wrapped up in valve sizes. You can step up to a 2.00" intakevalve if you want. Bigger valves would be shrouded by the small bore anyway.
I thought valve shroud was not a big issue for FI.
Old 09-29-2012, 02:47 PM
  #5  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (50)
 
oange ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

it's not, niether is bigger valve sizes especially at extra cost
Old 09-29-2012, 03:00 PM
  #6  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
5.3swap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: midland michigan
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sorry guys, i was on my way out the door when i posted the question and didnt give the information on it. its a 5.3 block, i'm keeping the bottom end stock as far as crank, rods, and piston. its at the machine shop right now getting hot tanked, honed and cam bearings. the heads are 862's and they are all stock. i will be using an ls1 style intake and 60mm twin turbo set up. i will be using an overdrive trans and probably a 3:23 rear gear. is that enough info.

the guy at the machine shop said i would be better off buying a pair of rhs heads for about $700 vs spending about the same amount to get mine up to that level... any input?

thanks
Old 09-29-2012, 03:02 PM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (50)
 
oange ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

you'd be better off putting the extra money toward better pistons..
Old 09-29-2012, 03:10 PM
  #8  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
5.3swap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: midland michigan
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hey orange thanks for the input. not trying to debate ya honestly (i'm kinda a newbie to motors) but why. everything i read about these 5.3 lower ends is that they are amazing. big bang theory article for example. i can do better pistons but i wasn't going to if i didn't need it. this will be strictly a street car never gonna see a pair of slicks. the tuner in my area said we'll probably tune for somewhere between 12 and 14 lbs of boost and call it a day.

thanks again, very appreciated anytime i get input on this stuff.
Old 09-29-2012, 03:32 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
 
miatainthe10s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Dela-Where?
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Big bang theory was run on 116 oct. Stock heads have gone 1k rwhp. If I would do anything to the heads it would be inconel exhaust valves stock size.
Old 09-29-2012, 04:46 PM
  #10  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
5.3swap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: midland michigan
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by miatainthe10s
Big bang theory was run on 116 oct. Stock heads have gone 1k rwhp. If I would do anything to the heads it would be inconel exhaust valves stock size.
just mentioned that article in regards to the bottom end holding up. I'm not following what they did. orange mentioned i should consider better pistons vs head work. so i asked why, I'm not motor guru so i was/am genuinely curious why.
Old 09-29-2012, 06:37 PM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (50)
 
oange ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

They ran that motor on 118 octane race gas on an engine dyno with TEA ported stock heads, only change being the intake valve size (and porting obviously). If you want 850whp you're gonna need pistons at a minimum to have some degree of reliability. That's just my 2 cents, it's your money.
Old 09-29-2012, 07:37 PM
  #12  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
5.3swap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: midland michigan
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oange ss
They ran that motor on 118 octane race gas on an engine dyno with TEA ported stock heads, only change being the intake valve size (and porting obviously). If you want 850whp you're gonna need pistons at a minimum to have some degree of reliability. That's just my 2 cents, it's your money.
i hear ya orange thanks for the input. much appreciated. i can get a set of forged pistons for $499 so maybe i'll look into that.

back to the heads... so with boost do you guys thank i should leave well enough alone with the stock heads and direct the $ elsewhere? other then some better springs.
Old 09-30-2012, 12:02 PM
  #13  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (22)
 
SPRAYED 01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northwest side of Chicago
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Leave the heads alone. Get mls head gaskets and arp head studs. If you want to spend more money get a good cam and really good springs.
Old 09-30-2012, 12:12 PM
  #14  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
5.3swap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: midland michigan
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SPRAYED 01
Leave the heads alone. Get mls head gaskets and arp head studs. If you want to spend more money get a good cam and really good springs.
thanks sprayed those are already in the budget i'd love some recomendations on cams though
Old 09-30-2012, 12:32 PM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
gnx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,453
Received 150 Likes on 97 Posts

Default

what year is the 5.3?

'05+ rods are LS2 style and a hell of a lot stronger than LS1 style.
Old 09-30-2012, 12:37 PM
  #16  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
5.3swap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: midland michigan
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

2002 5.3



Quick Reply: best valve combo for turbo



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 AM.