Is an 850 too much carb for 5.3?
#1
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Gumptown
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is an 850 too much carb for 5.3?
As many of you know, I have an '88 coupe mustang with a carb'd 5.3. It has a custom Pat G cam, milled 243's, long tubes, th350 with a PTC 4K stall and 4.10's. I have a vic Jr with an out of the box Holley 850 dp with choke horn, etc. Anyway, I have an Innovate air fuel gauge and seeing as how the track was closed, I was trying to get the afr close by doing 3 to 4 second bursts on the street WOT in 2nd gear. I was getting between 10.2 and 10.7 to 1! I know I should be around 13: 1, right?
My questions are: Is the 850 too big for my 5.3, and should I just go ahead and get a Holley 750 hp? If I do try to keep the 850, how many jet sizes should I go down to try to get the afr to 13:1? Also, I have a custom curve in the 6010 box, but I haven't got to look at it yet. Should I check the timing curve before messing with the carb?
Thanks for any help.
My questions are: Is the 850 too big for my 5.3, and should I just go ahead and get a Holley 750 hp? If I do try to keep the 850, how many jet sizes should I go down to try to get the afr to 13:1? Also, I have a custom curve in the 6010 box, but I haven't got to look at it yet. Should I check the timing curve before messing with the carb?
Thanks for any help.
#2
850 is most likely bigger than you need. Doesn't mean it can't be made to work, just means it will be a little harder to get tuned right.
The wideband will make it pretty easy to get the WOT jetting right. Just go down two sizes at a time until you are at your desired AFR.
Timing won't really affect the carb settings at WOT so much. It is getting the car to drive smoothly when cruising and normal driving that the carb and timing interaction comes into play.
The wideband will make it pretty easy to get the WOT jetting right. Just go down two sizes at a time until you are at your desired AFR.
Timing won't really affect the carb settings at WOT so much. It is getting the car to drive smoothly when cruising and normal driving that the carb and timing interaction comes into play.
#3
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Gumptown
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
850 is most likely bigger than you need. Doesn't mean it can't be made to work, just means it will be a little harder to get tuned right.
The wideband will make it pretty easy to get the WOT jetting right. Just go down two sizes at a time until you are at your desired AFR.
Timing won't really affect the carb settings at WOT so much. It is getting the car to drive smoothly when cruising and normal driving that the carb and timing interaction comes into play.
The wideband will make it pretty easy to get the WOT jetting right. Just go down two sizes at a time until you are at your desired AFR.
Timing won't really affect the carb settings at WOT so much. It is getting the car to drive smoothly when cruising and normal driving that the carb and timing interaction comes into play.
#4
Adjust the primary and secondary jets independently. You can even disconnect the secondaries to get the primaries right first.
#7
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Gumptown
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks
Trending Topics
#9
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
The general rule is: high stall (3000 or more) go mechanical secondaries. Vacuum carburetors do not operate efficiently in cars with high stalls and high numerical gear ratios. Mechanical secondaries perform far superior in these applications.
Vacuum secondaries are good for mild applications where you have low stall or stock torque converters and/or low numerical final drive ratios and heavier vehicles.
#10
TECH Resident
I see your point... especially with a 4k stall (I missed that part).
Basically, I am advocate of vacuum secondaries on a car that is "more street than strip". But, I do not know the OP's intent. I was always under the impression that an adjustable vacuum secondary could be tuned to work properly for a given situation. Is that not the case??
Basically, I am advocate of vacuum secondaries on a car that is "more street than strip". But, I do not know the OP's intent. I was always under the impression that an adjustable vacuum secondary could be tuned to work properly for a given situation. Is that not the case??
#11
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Gumptown
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My car is driven on the street, but it is definitely more oriented toward the strip. It has a spool, large cam, and a large stall. However, everyone's definition of streetable is different. I feel it drives better than my old '99 T/A with 6.0 and 4K converter.
Anyway, I got the msd 6012 hooked up and looked at my timing map. It had something like 20 degrees total timing with the map sensor supposed to kick in more. However, there is no map sensor hooked up! I started with a very conservative map: 12* @ 0 rpm, 15* @ 200 rpm, 18* @ 800 rpm, ramped up to 29* all in by 3000. Even with the AFR still super fat, the car felt worlds different. It roasted the 28 X 11.5 M/T ET Street bias plies on the 1-2 shift for about 5 feet. I am going to the track Friday and keep adding more timing and ramping it in sooner until I slow down or get detonation.
Anyway, I got the msd 6012 hooked up and looked at my timing map. It had something like 20 degrees total timing with the map sensor supposed to kick in more. However, there is no map sensor hooked up! I started with a very conservative map: 12* @ 0 rpm, 15* @ 200 rpm, 18* @ 800 rpm, ramped up to 29* all in by 3000. Even with the AFR still super fat, the car felt worlds different. It roasted the 28 X 11.5 M/T ET Street bias plies on the 1-2 shift for about 5 feet. I am going to the track Friday and keep adding more timing and ramping it in sooner until I slow down or get detonation.