KW Variant 3 - is there any way to keep the boot down?
#2
thats pretty much normal, I believe the upper collar supports the entire boot and is attached at the upper strut bearing. if you are worried, look into some coil overs covers (socks) for added protection
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show....php?t=2330815
or if you dont want to make them there are several companies that sell that, from kirkey, to jegs, to summit, to a number of subaru based sites like dirtyimpreza.com (I believe another DIY).
If it helps, I have had mine on for 2 years (no winters) and they look brand new still.
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show....php?t=2330815
or if you dont want to make them there are several companies that sell that, from kirkey, to jegs, to summit, to a number of subaru based sites like dirtyimpreza.com (I believe another DIY).
If it helps, I have had mine on for 2 years (no winters) and they look brand new still.
#4
stock KW springs yes, at this point with all the rear bushings and bracings, I think i need to soften the compression settings a bit, just havent had the time to get the car up in the air lately.
#5
I'm going in the opposite direction. Presently evaluating the recommended compression and rebound settings. The rear springs are at least 150 in-lbs too soft--acceleration and cornering results in way too much load transfer. The only thing that has me hesitating is that Swift only sells springs in 20 Nm increments above 100 Nm. I'll either end up with 100/120 springs, or 120/140 (roughly 675 in-lbs/784 in-lbs).
#6
I'm going in the opposite direction. Presently evaluating the recommended compression and rebound settings. The rear springs are at least 150 in-lbs too soft--acceleration and cornering results in way too much load transfer. The only thing that has me hesitating is that Swift only sells springs in 20 Nm increments above 100 Nm. I'll either end up with 100/120 springs, or 120/140 (roughly 675 in-lbs/784 in-lbs).
#7
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have the 110Nm on the back with the stock 100Nm front but its a bit too firm for my better half after adding sway bars and even loosening up the bump/rebound some. I bought a 9inch 500in/lb for the front going to try that with the stock 90nm rear and see how that rides. I run a square 275/40 setup so I have these things cranked up near stock ride height to prevent rubbing in the front so this soft setup may not work without buying a different rear spring like a 100nm or sticking with the 110nm rear I have already. For the rear spring I did fit a H&R 60mm id in there but its tight which can be had at 10nm increments for 250mm/10inch lengths. I think a 65mm id would also work as well but don't know for sure. Which size of swift spring were you planning to use on the rear?
Trending Topics
#8
Try reducing your bump settings first. There's a great article that I would like to point you at, but can't because I'm on my phone. Essentially, the article states that shock compression dampening is best described as adding to your spring rate under bump loads, but under sustained loading, compression dampening is ineffective to control body lean because oil in the shock continuously flows through the valving like air out of a punctured tire.
I can back this up with personal experience. I went directly from the Ground Control kit with 650/700 in-lb springs to the stock KW Variant 3 kit with stock 574/514 springs. Initially, I didn't calibrate the shocks to recommended values, and immediately noted how harsh the ride was compared to my GC setup. Then I checked the shocks and found that their bump compression was 1/4 turn off full hard. Now I'm running recommended settings with the stock springs and the ride is incredibly compliant. Only complaints are associated with load transfer under hard, sustained braking, cornering, and acceleration. Solving those problems will require stiffer springs, which will require a reduction in compression dampening and an increase in rebound dampening to compensate.
I'll get you Swift part numbers when I get home.
I can back this up with personal experience. I went directly from the Ground Control kit with 650/700 in-lb springs to the stock KW Variant 3 kit with stock 574/514 springs. Initially, I didn't calibrate the shocks to recommended values, and immediately noted how harsh the ride was compared to my GC setup. Then I checked the shocks and found that their bump compression was 1/4 turn off full hard. Now I'm running recommended settings with the stock springs and the ride is incredibly compliant. Only complaints are associated with load transfer under hard, sustained braking, cornering, and acceleration. Solving those problems will require stiffer springs, which will require a reduction in compression dampening and an increase in rebound dampening to compensate.
I'll get you Swift part numbers when I get home.
#9
Was considering:
2x Z70-203-120 front springs (8" length, 70mm ID, 120 N-m / 672 in-lbs)
2x Z60-228-140 rear springs (9" length, 60mm ID, 140 N-m / 784 in-lbs)
Still not sure. Been reading this thread now and again. The other option, which might cost me more in the long run, is to stick with the stock front springs and try a Z60-228-120 (9" length, 60mm ID, 120 N-m / 672 in-lbs) in the rear to reduce understeer.
2x Z70-203-120 front springs (8" length, 70mm ID, 120 N-m / 672 in-lbs)
2x Z60-228-140 rear springs (9" length, 60mm ID, 140 N-m / 784 in-lbs)
Still not sure. Been reading this thread now and again. The other option, which might cost me more in the long run, is to stick with the stock front springs and try a Z60-228-120 (9" length, 60mm ID, 120 N-m / 672 in-lbs) in the rear to reduce understeer.