Catch Can W/Fast 92 and LS6 Valley Cover
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: KCRP
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Catch Can W/Fast 92 and LS6 Valley Cover
I was curious if any of you are using a catch can while using a Fast 92 and the 2004 LS6 valley cover.
The intake and valley cover are the mods I will be using and I was wondering if there was any need to place a catch can into the mix.
Cheers,
Q
The intake and valley cover are the mods I will be using and I was wondering if there was any need to place a catch can into the mix.
Cheers,
Q
#3
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: KCRP
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That is great news to hear and nice setup you have there! I wanted to use the catch can just for looks but since it is functional, that is even better.
You are running the same catch can (mine is bare aluminum) I will be running..
Q
You are running the same catch can (mine is bare aluminum) I will be running..
Q
#4
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Van Buren AR
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks man. It's a great set-up, I've loved it so far. I took my intake off recently and it was dry! Not even mist! Even though I have fuel rail covers I also like not having crappy ls1 lines running all around my motor. I bought the belt tensioner for aesthetic reasons only, I thought it'd look good next to my catch can, it does keep the belt nice and tight though compared to the stocker.
#5
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
IMO, if you intake has anymore than a light film of oil in it, then get a CC; otherwise don't. I also have a CC with my newer ls6 valley cover and FAST 92 intake, 2 actually a small one of the passenger side head and a larger RevXtreme down below the passenger side headlight.