Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Twin PTE 6176s or TC78?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-2013, 11:36 PM
  #1  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
02_ramair_ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanford, Ca
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Lightbulb Twin PTE 6176s or TC78?

I have been putting together my 72 Nova for awhile now, and I am finishing it up. I have a basiclly new tc78 with a .96 exh housing that I planned on using for my 5.3L setup. I am thinking about making a deal on a set of pte6176 turbos. Has anyone used them? My plans for the car are to be mostly a drag car, with limited street duty.

What are yalls opinions?
Old 08-15-2013, 06:19 AM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
 
DEFYANT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Okmulgee, OK
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd go with the twins. The TC78 runs out of steam in the turbine section fairly quick.
Old 08-15-2013, 07:31 AM
  #3  
wrp
9 Second Club
 
wrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've only seen 1-2 LSx applications using the Precisions, and the results seem disappointing. I am into a build with the Precision 6266's as twins. On paper they should be impressive, in practice the only real results I can find are on Hondas, SRT-4's, and Supra's. As singles, those results are impressive though. Lots of the Precision units seem to have problems with oiling. Don't know if that is just poor setups or some real problem with the units.
Old 08-15-2013, 02:25 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
02_ramair_ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanford, Ca
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

I have been searching as well, without finding alot of good results with the smaller 60s, like you mentioned most of the info I am finding seems to be smaller motors or imports..

bump back up.. anyone else?
Old 08-15-2013, 02:28 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
jt76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 1,172
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by wrp
I've only seen 1-2 LSx applications using the Precisions, and the results seem disappointing. I am into a build with the Precision 6266's as twins. On paper they should be impressive, in practice the only real results I can find are on Hondas, SRT-4's, and Supra's. As singles, those results are impressive though. Lots of the Precision units seem to have problems with oiling. Don't know if that is just poor setups or some real problem with the units.
Hmm... check out my sig the PTE units are treating me well.
Old 08-15-2013, 02:30 PM
  #6  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
02_ramair_ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanford, Ca
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

I am sending you a PM sir. thank you
Old 08-15-2013, 05:54 PM
  #7  
wrp
9 Second Club
 
wrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jt76
Hmm... check out my sig the PTE units are treating me well.
I hope you are getting good reliability, that is one of the main reasons we made the PTE choice. I am figuring 800/800 is a pretty good goal. What Flange/AR are you running?
Old 08-15-2013, 05:59 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Blackpanther99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 6,963
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Twin Precisions would be a better choice IMO.
Old 08-15-2013, 06:39 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
jt76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 1,172
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by wrp
I hope you are getting good reliability, that is one of the main reasons we made the PTE choice. I am figuring 800/800 is a pretty good goal. What Flange/AR are you running?
So far so good.. probably 3k miles so far. I have the t3 Vband with .82 a/r
Old 08-15-2013, 06:57 PM
  #10  
wrp
9 Second Club
 
wrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jt76
So far so good.. probably 3k miles so far. I have the t3 Vband with .82 a/r
That is exactly what I have. I was figuring around 800 ish. Big step down in HP/TQ but I am hoping for a lot less carnage.
Old 08-15-2013, 07:07 PM
  #11  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
02_ramair_ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanford, Ca
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

all of this is making me want to just throw these 6176s on my firebird... I have a 9.8:1 compression 370 with LS3 heads and 6 speed.. Im thinking putting these twins on there, and just building a bigger single setup for the nova..

So with the 62s you made 800rwhp.. on pump? without meth? If I dont meet my goals, I can always sell these and buy a set of 67s...
Old 08-15-2013, 07:43 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
jt76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 1,172
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 02_ramair_ta
all of this is making me want to just throw these 6176s on my firebird... I have a 9.8:1 compression 370 with LS3 heads and 6 speed.. Im thinking putting these twins on there, and just building a bigger single setup for the nova..

So with the 62s you made 800rwhp.. on pump? without meth? If I dont meet my goals, I can always sell these and buy a set of 67s...
93 pump right from Kwik fill
Old 08-15-2013, 08:02 PM
  #13  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
02_ramair_ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanford, Ca
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Im doing it.. we will see how this works out!!!
Old 08-15-2013, 08:50 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Blackpanther99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 6,963
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Start a build thread Goodluck!
Old 08-15-2013, 09:14 PM
  #15  
6 Second Club Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
LASTLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lombard .IL
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by wrp
I've only seen 1-2 LSx applications using the Precisions, and the results seem disappointing. I am into a build with the Precision 6266's as twins. On paper they should be impressive, in practice the only real results I can find are on Hondas, SRT-4's, and Supra's. As singles, those results are impressive though. Lots of the Precision units seem to have problems with oiling. Don't know if that is just poor setups or some real problem with the units.
The Precisions work well for me
Old 08-15-2013, 11:29 PM
  #16  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
ZNix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Plympton, MA
Posts: 193
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

I love my single 6176! Beast turbo. This single should put me in the 520-530whp range. Two of them would be even better .

Zack
Old 08-16-2013, 06:20 AM
  #17  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
venom ws7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: EARTH
Posts: 5,965
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

Those twins will make a lot more power over single TC78.
Old 08-16-2013, 07:10 AM
  #18  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
408GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: GA
Posts: 966
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Here's an example of a 378 ci lsx with small twins and 317's making mid 900's on around 14 psi. https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...eo-inside.html

The only thing I see as a downside to doing a twin setup is everything costs double, and having to fab everything up. Then you look at that guy with the Nova and a single t-4 76 running 8.39's at over 164 mph...then you wonder why twins!!



Quick Reply: Twin PTE 6176s or TC78?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 AM.