mokszya21

iTrader: (6)

Was looking at getting a vengeance racing ported 92mm fast manifold with the 92mm nick williams throttle body. I was also going to replace my stock ls1 maf with the z06 85mm. Wondering what type of gains I would see with adding these vs my set-up. I have torquer v2 cam, 243 ported heads, bbk ssi manifold with 85mm throttle body, volant cai, stock ls1 maf, magnaflow exhaust, bbk headers with off-road y. My numbers after the tune were 392rwhp and 365 rwtq. trying to be around that 415hp and 380 tq mark. Input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks

badazz81z28

iTrader: (6)

Your current power #s actually seem pretty low for the combo. I have seen cam only cars make more than you have. With ported 243s and a healthy cam, you should be over the 400 mark.

I don't have much experience with the BBK, but the FAST 92 is a proven intake. In ported form from vengeance and the elimination of a heat soaked metal intake, I bet you see a good gains.

Who ported the heads? That may be an issue if someone just hogged them out.

Blackpanther99

iTrader: (8)

I think you would benefit pretty good gains over that BBK.

M4N14C

iTrader: (3)

If you're going with fast might as well go with the 102. People with good H/C/I setups have seen gains of 20+ hp over LS6 going with the 102.

td1168

iTrader: (2)

What kind of dyno was used? Your numbers are good for a mustang dyno. I'm in the process of swapping my BBK for a fast92 intake and TB. My dyno numbers were 385rwhp and 370rwtq. I'm putting mine back on the dyno this Saturday so I'll let you know what I gain. Hopefully the advice I got on here about the BBK being a piece of **** was good advice!

mokszya21

iTrader: (6)

yeah let me know what your new numbers are. I actually just bought a fast 102mm manifold and will be doing the swap in winter and getting it retuned in spring. Still have to get 102mm nick williams throttle body and fuel rails now.

MikeWS6

I would say that on another dyno you would be right around the 420/390 mark. The 102 should be good for another 10-15 or so.

Detoxx03

iTrader: (14)

No need for the 102 on your setup but the fast 92 will make your combo shine.

badazz81z28

iTrader: (6)

I disagree. Many folks think my combo makes more power than it should....I have a FAST 102. I'm sure that has help my power level

Detoxx03

iTrader: (14)

I have pretty good experience with the fast 92 and have seen multiple 102's on different builds. 92 is the sweet spot for his cube/head setup. Max effort n/a setup over 400 ci with badass heads 102 all day. I just run a stock LS3 intake now though since the blower does the work.

Kingc8r

iTrader: (21)

Don't forget all the other stuff you have to buy to make the FAST 102 work. That makes the cost per HP go up and should be food for thought. I went with a Fast 92

99Bluz28

iTrader: (35)

I got to agree with Kingc8r, a lot of people initially don't realize the hidden cost that can be associated with the FAST 102 intake, but not with the FAST92. Now there is a additional plus side to the FAST 102 that some might not be aware of; it's smog legal in California.
Still you got to love the black finish of the FAST92 intake!

lookin4aTA

I wouldn't recommend a 102/102 unless you plan on going bigger cubes later. that is why I went with that setup. I can't imagine that it would make more than a 10hp difference with my current setup, even in the vette.

1997trans-am

iTrader: (2)

I know I am bumping an old thread, but did you ever get your car dynoed with the fast 92?

garygnu

the fast 102 intake is great ,but for most ls engine combos a fast 102 intake mite gain 7 rwhp over a fast 92 intake .if you have a fast 90/92 intake ,it is up to you .

1997trans-am

iTrader: (2)

I bought a car that already has a BBK SSI intake. (5.3L , ported ls6 heads, tsp torquer v2 112, pacesetter headers)

I am wondering if the 92 fast intake would be a noticeable difference in power.

dr_whigham

iTrader: (49)

Yes. Sell the BBK

1997trans-am

iTrader: (2)

I forgot to mention that I have a tsp torquer v2 cam -112lsa