Paging RUQWIKR(shift point Q).....
10-02-2002, 07:37 PM
#1
Paging RUQWIKR(shift point Q)..... Hey man, Bob2of3 sent me that "rundown of mods" list you had posted. Very well written. It's a good learning tool for me to go by. Anyways, main questions are, what were your shift points(i know the HPP settings, just looking for rpm) and why did you go with a negative number on the 2-3 shift? thanks for any help.
Chris
Chris
10-02-2002, 08:32 PM
#2
TECH Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Paging RUQWIKR(shift point Q)..... He probably went negative because of Torque Management. I had mine set at -5 and it helped. But thanks to Ed Wright its gone now.
10-03-2002, 02:28 PM
#3
9 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Back home in Texas!!! (DFW)
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Paging RUQWIKR(shift point Q)..... </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Loco:
<strong>He probably went negative because of Torque Management. I had mine set at -5 and it helped. But thanks to Ed Wright its gone now.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">All I did as a bolt-on car was to push rev limiter to 6600 to keep from banging off it on the 1-2 and 2-3 along with 0, 1, or +2 on the 1-2 and no change on the 2-3. In fact, I could not statistically tell a difference with either of the 3 settings with 1-2 on ET or mph.
As far as torque management, it and the REST of the cal was stock. I had PCM with the torque management out but did not show any repeatable gains. I don't want to start the old argument of pro/con to TM. I prefer to leave it in for durability concerns.
Now that I am H/C, I have only had about 10 runs with it like that and have been playing with shift points and limiter settings. No run has been clean on both shifts as far as hitting the limiter (6600-7000).
BTW, you can tell Bob2of3 to get ahold of me once in a while as he has fallen off the face of the earth.
<strong>He probably went negative because of Torque Management. I had mine set at -5 and it helped. But thanks to Ed Wright its gone now.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">All I did as a bolt-on car was to push rev limiter to 6600 to keep from banging off it on the 1-2 and 2-3 along with 0, 1, or +2 on the 1-2 and no change on the 2-3. In fact, I could not statistically tell a difference with either of the 3 settings with 1-2 on ET or mph.
As far as torque management, it and the REST of the cal was stock. I had PCM with the torque management out but did not show any repeatable gains. I don't want to start the old argument of pro/con to TM. I prefer to leave it in for durability concerns.
Now that I am H/C, I have only had about 10 runs with it like that and have been playing with shift points and limiter settings. No run has been clean on both shifts as far as hitting the limiter (6600-7000).
BTW, you can tell Bob2of3 to get ahold of me once in a while as he has fallen off the face of the earth.
10-03-2002, 05:05 PM
#4
Re: Paging RUQWIKR(shift point Q)..... Thanks for the info!!
I was just confused cause you had written you went +2 on the 1-2 and then -2 on the 2-3 w/ a 6400 limiter <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> i'm hoping to play with the car in the next coming week. thanks again.
Chris
I was just confused cause you had written you went +2 on the 1-2 and then -2 on the 2-3 w/ a 6400 limiter <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> i'm hoping to play with the car in the next coming week. thanks again.
Chris
10-04-2002, 07:19 AM
#5
9 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Back home in Texas!!! (DFW)
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Paging RUQWIKR(shift point Q)..... </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by z28kid98:
<strong>Thanks for the info!!
I was just confused cause you had written you went +2 on the 1-2 and then -2 on the 2-3 w/ a 6400 limiter <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> i'm hoping to play with the car in the next coming week. thanks again.
Chris</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">The 6400 limiter was with the 3.23's last fall. This spring, when I changed to 4.11's in a 12-bolt, I pushed it to 6600. Now, with h/c, the limiter is 7000.
<strong>Thanks for the info!!
I was just confused cause you had written you went +2 on the 1-2 and then -2 on the 2-3 w/ a 6400 limiter <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> i'm hoping to play with the car in the next coming week. thanks again.
Chris</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">The 6400 limiter was with the 3.23's last fall. This spring, when I changed to 4.11's in a 12-bolt, I pushed it to 6600. Now, with h/c, the limiter is 7000.
