Best heads for 2K
#1
Best heads for around $2K
Looking to get the best heads I can for around 2K. I don't have any cores. Im using the TSP 231/237 with 1.75 RR.
Last edited by max's dad; 08-21-2004 at 12:01 PM.
#2
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Texas
Posts: 8,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hmm PP "LS6" heads, they're LQ9 heads which are port welded and then cnc'd and hand polished i do believe. they're $1895 assembled from Patriot Performance. There's at least a half dozen people running those heads with the 231/237 cam with great results. BTW, who did your tune on your car? I'm gonna be installing the 231/237 in a month or so and am thinking of a TSP mail-order until I get heads and nitrous, then I'll get a dyno tune.
#7
Originally Posted by jrp
not going with the AFR's anymore huh? i'd look into a nice stg 2/2.5 5.3 head, check with AS or TEA.
Trending Topics
#8
I always wondered how a set of Extrude Honed Patriot head would do, $1300 for the heads and about $750 or so to Extrude Hone. That may be a little but I have always been interested in a head done that way.
#11
TECH Senior Member
Originally Posted by max's dad
Tough decision. I don't want to skimp on heads. Perfect scenerio would allow for a large cam and good compression. With my pistons, an unmilled AFR would yield a CR suitable for a blower. Not what I'm after.
#12
Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
You still didn't talk to Tony Mamo about how much can you mill AFR's?
No, it's the weekend. What if you take a ton of material off of the deck, and have to have them cleaned up down the road?
#16
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Texas
Posts: 8,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by max's dad
That's what stinks. I'd go LS6 in a second if the cores weren 't a factor.
#17
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can mill my LS1 heads to 62cc safely or my LS6 heads to 59cc's but then there's the core... My 66 cc LS1 heads are making in the 430-450 rwhp area with 230/230/112 XE-R.
I may have a connection for LS6 cores. Check your mail.
I may have a connection for LS6 cores. Check your mail.
#19
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
Originally Posted by WILWAXU
Why? LS6 castings are not needed for a 346...
The core charge on the LS1 Stage 2E's is only a couple hunderd bucks.
The core charge on the LS1 Stage 2E's is only a couple hunderd bucks.
Floyd
#20
AFR's / Milling Info...
Hello...
Seems everyone is panicking about smaller combustion chambers, how much can I mill?.....etc....etc.
First off, you are no worse off from a "piston to valve" standpoint with an AFR 205 head versus a ported stock head....in fact, you are probably slightly better off as a similar chamber volume from us should yield slightly more piston to valve.
That being said, to not consider an AFR because we don't offer a smaller chamber "out of the box" is silly....Let us or your favorite machine shop mill the heads. We do it all the time.
Also, you guys don't realize that you just can't take a head that has a certain "valve drop", and just start arbitrarily welding aluminum everywhere to shrink the chamber volume while still retaining the same "valve drop" which directly effects piston to valve.
(NOTE: When I say "valve drop", I'm referring to the distance the valve will drop if you placed the head on a flat surface. You can check that figure with a checking spring by pushing down on the valve until it contacts that flat surface. Chamber design, milling, and valve job heights are the three variables that directly effect valve drop which directly effects the amount of piston to valve available.)
Actually, you COULD weld aluminum everywhere and pick up some compression by shrinking the chamber, and you can also completely destroy all the low and midlift flow numbers as well with a new "chamber design" that shrouds the valves with a bunch of extra aluminum. Final result....an engine that makes less power with higher compression because it can't fill the cylinder as well. There is a method to our madness....we have been CNC porting and manufacturing cylinder heads for over 30 years!!
The AFR chamber design was held as small as possible while still complimenting and aiding airflow all across the curve. It is more of a "semi-open" design with dual quench pads while I would say the factory design is more of an open "bathtub" style chamber.
Feel free to mill as much off the deck as needed....it's .750 thick. There will be a point with an excessive mill that correcting the intake flange becomes required, but that is not an uncommon situation. Currently, the smallest we have gone is 59 cc's (approx. an .040 flatmill) and manifold fitment is still not an issue....Some of our dealers order and stock them on their shelf exactly that spec.
Anyway....Before spending countless days looking for info on the internet, isn't it faster and more reliable just to call the manufacturer and get their input....Thats what I do when I need some straight answers.
CALL US....I try to be available to everyone, and in the event I can't be reached, any one of our tech guys could help you. In the event they don't have the answer, they will get the answer and call you back.
Hope this helps guys...
Tony M.
Seems everyone is panicking about smaller combustion chambers, how much can I mill?.....etc....etc.
First off, you are no worse off from a "piston to valve" standpoint with an AFR 205 head versus a ported stock head....in fact, you are probably slightly better off as a similar chamber volume from us should yield slightly more piston to valve.
That being said, to not consider an AFR because we don't offer a smaller chamber "out of the box" is silly....Let us or your favorite machine shop mill the heads. We do it all the time.
Also, you guys don't realize that you just can't take a head that has a certain "valve drop", and just start arbitrarily welding aluminum everywhere to shrink the chamber volume while still retaining the same "valve drop" which directly effects piston to valve.
(NOTE: When I say "valve drop", I'm referring to the distance the valve will drop if you placed the head on a flat surface. You can check that figure with a checking spring by pushing down on the valve until it contacts that flat surface. Chamber design, milling, and valve job heights are the three variables that directly effect valve drop which directly effects the amount of piston to valve available.)
Actually, you COULD weld aluminum everywhere and pick up some compression by shrinking the chamber, and you can also completely destroy all the low and midlift flow numbers as well with a new "chamber design" that shrouds the valves with a bunch of extra aluminum. Final result....an engine that makes less power with higher compression because it can't fill the cylinder as well. There is a method to our madness....we have been CNC porting and manufacturing cylinder heads for over 30 years!!
The AFR chamber design was held as small as possible while still complimenting and aiding airflow all across the curve. It is more of a "semi-open" design with dual quench pads while I would say the factory design is more of an open "bathtub" style chamber.
Feel free to mill as much off the deck as needed....it's .750 thick. There will be a point with an excessive mill that correcting the intake flange becomes required, but that is not an uncommon situation. Currently, the smallest we have gone is 59 cc's (approx. an .040 flatmill) and manifold fitment is still not an issue....Some of our dealers order and stock them on their shelf exactly that spec.
Anyway....Before spending countless days looking for info on the internet, isn't it faster and more reliable just to call the manufacturer and get their input....Thats what I do when I need some straight answers.
CALL US....I try to be available to everyone, and in the event I can't be reached, any one of our tech guys could help you. In the event they don't have the answer, they will get the answer and call you back.
Hope this helps guys...
Tony M.