Auto Vette VS. Me?
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario, California
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Auto Vette VS. Me?
auto c5 vette, guessing an 02 or 03. has intake xpipe and sum exhast system, sorry dont know key details, but what do u think would be the outcome considering i dont have a tune, weight, blah blah, etc. (my car in the sig)
juss so i have an idea what im up against.
juss so i have an idea what im up against.
#4
TECH Addict
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the C5 was not modded I would guess that you would have a good chance. With the 02' or 03' vette being modded (similiar to yours, exhaust) I would say it will be close or the vette.
#5
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario, California
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yea the vette came out on top, at about 80 he was about a car. yea them autos freakin rock, compared to unmodded M6s ive raced and beaten without problems. still a great race.
#6
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: houston
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by emanneercstahp
yea the vette came out on top, at about 80 he was about a car. yea them autos freakin rock, compared to unmodded M6s ive raced and beaten without problems. still a great race.
#7
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario, California
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if i were supposed to, then he had sum other stuff under the hood. i was ahead from start to about 40mph, then he started pulling ahead, not fast but he was passing me up. from what i saw compared to my car, i would assume he had atleast 10hp onme and plus i had a 215lb passanger, he also had a passenger but not 215. so im still assuming the weight/hp advantage. he had to have had more than what i stated b4
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by emanneercstahp
if i were supposed to, then he had sum other stuff under the hood. i was ahead from start to about 40mph, then he started pulling ahead, not fast but he was passing me up. from what i saw compared to my car, i would assume he had atleast 10hp onme and plus i had a 215lb passanger, he also had a passenger but not 215. so im still assuming the weight/hp advantage. he had to have had more than what i stated b4
I raced a vette with an intake and catback exhaust (M6) when i was full bolt-on, took me till 90 mph before i could pull him and then after I got about one length we pretty much evened out... Those things got some pump on top end
#9
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario, California
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yea i think thats why then, bc i was beating him until he was top end of 2nd and low 3rd. i beat him from my 1st and 2nd then he started pulling up on me. so yea yer probably right.
#10
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Palos Hills, IL
Posts: 3,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
he had to have had soemthing else...because A4 vettes had 2.73's form what i believe ive read...and no option of anything more...so this would mean your acceleration would be much quicker hense your 1st 2nd gear lead but your 3rd gear should have already been engaged while hes still rolling through 2nd...
his aerodynamics and weight may have played a trick or too but that doesnt make sense
i think somethings fishy especially with just an intake X pipe and catback
try to run em without a passenger, and remove your spare tireand jack then if you still loose somethings wrong
his aerodynamics and weight may have played a trick or too but that doesnt make sense
i think somethings fishy especially with just an intake X pipe and catback
try to run em without a passenger, and remove your spare tireand jack then if you still loose somethings wrong
#11
TECH Senior Member
Originally Posted by 02WS6Bird
he had to have had soemthing else...because A4 vettes had 2.73's form what i believe ive read...and no option of anything more...
The A4 Vettes can come with either 2.73s or 3.15s. Mine has 3.15s in it.
#14
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
all i know...is i raced my friend in his 2000 GT Mustang..with Full Exhaust Done..and Intake, and Suspension...and i have my Stock 1998 T/A with bald rear tires
and i smoked his *** off the line..and it only got worse from there at the end..i had about 4+ cars on him ..
and i smoked his *** off the line..and it only got worse from there at the end..i had about 4+ cars on him ..
#16
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 66ImpalaLT1
M6's are easier to beat? Thats a laugh. They must be granny-shiftin and not double clutchin like they should.
#17
Originally Posted by Tiger2o69
My car is not a vette but when i race against m6's with the same mods they pull a half car maybe but when I hit 3rd i blow by them. I guess autos have good top end or something.
a4>=m6 off the line especially with a tc
well driven m6 is a dangerous thing, powershifting can make an stock SS run 12s and a stock zo6 run 11s
#18
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well somehow mine is opposite. Sorry, maybe that the way it goes most of the time but not my car. With same more or more they get me off the line and through there 2nd but then I pull by them hard.
#19
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 66ImpalaLT1
M6's are easier to beat? Thats a laugh. They must be granny-shiftin and not double clutchin like they should.