Lady Redhawk

iTrader: (6)

We had our 2001 WS6 M6 dyno'ed yesterday.
It made 453/410
Scroll down on this page and see mods and links to charts of before and after install.

My 2001 Firehawk A4 cam only dyno is there as while.

hitemup9nine

iTrader: (17)

A little off subject but is that cam you have in your firehawk based off the f13 on a custom lsa or is a totally different cam. Thanks. BTW good numbers

JF WS6

Numbers aren't bad by any means, but would have expected more. If the pistons were notched in the car it'd be interesting to redyno with 1.8 rockers considering the relatively mild lift of the cam. On another note, how does the car feel with that set up?

jrp

iTrader: (16)

what lobe series is the cam from? whats the .006/.050/.200, if you dont want it public you can PM and i'll keep it quite. im just wondering how "big" that cam is.

also the links too the dyno's dont work:

Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /22/1/50/23/208115023BLwWEd_ph.jpg on this server.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Apache/2.0.50 Server at image22.webshots.com Port 80

Lady Redhawk

iTrader: (6)

I had a Custom Comp cam made for my specs that Combination Motorsports had made. I hadn't seen the specs on the f13 at the time, but they do look close. I don't know what grid the F13 is, but, mine is on the aggressive ramp XE-R. I wanted it on a 111lsa. I like a challenge for tuning. lol The cam in my husband's car is also a custom cam. His lift is only 569/569, makes it easier on springs, and we don't believe you would get any more significant power by going any higher even with this large cam.

Seth who use to be at Combination Motorsports did the R & D on this cam.

Lady Redhawk

iTrader: (6)

hummm, I have been having trouble with that today, I will see what I can do. And I will get those specs for you from the office.

SideStep

Where these numbers SAE corrected???

jrp

iTrader: (16)

i think you are linking from your account and not the public domain. and thanks

Lady Redhawk

iTrader: (6)

It was standard. Here are the cal. not sure if you are to multiply by Relative Horsepower 98.7% or Dyno Correction Factor 1.013%, either way not more than 4 or 5 hp.


Here is the graph, I need to work on my website.

gomer

iTrader: (13)

Were the heads milled any? I would have expected a little more out of that setup. If you correct it to SAE and disregard that spike at the end, it doesn't make over 450rwhp thru a 10bolt. What did the car dyno before the heads? Did you guys dyno it while it was Cam only?

Pray

iTrader: (7)

What intake, TB, Maf, and pulley are you running?

Lady Redhawk

iTrader: (6)

I my first post I posted a link to all the mods on his car and cam only dyno. I am working now on fixing the link on that page for the charts. The heads were installed out of the box with Cometic gaskets. The CF DF Clutch grips 90% which can pull 10 to 15hp, but keeps the clutch safe.

Sport Side

iTrader: (6)

I thought the graph read 450/450

Nice results for such a large camshaft. I'd expected a greater loss in low end power.

silverbeast

iTrader: (16)

according to her site it dynoed 412 rwhp and 379 rwtq. so it gained 41 rwhp and 31 rwtq. not to bad but for the money afr's cost i would want a little more than that also.

Lady Redhawk

iTrader: (6)

OK, I have working links to the charts on that site now. Sorry about that.

jrp

iTrader: (16)

good man, or woman i should say

what gasket are you running? that cam is just itching for an 11.1 ratio. also, you dont happen to have an overlayy of the cam only vs heads. im curious the gain through the curve.

Lady Redhawk

iTrader: (6)

lol, He has the .040 Cometic gaskets which should make it 10.4 ratio. He would have to notch the pistons though if he milled the heads. He still has the stock intake manifold, and stock ported TB.

We didn't get an overlay, we were dyno tuning a bunch of cars and didn't get all the charts we wanted. But both charts are on the site for side by side compare.

jrp

iTrader: (16)

whats the deck height? even using a zero deck (which it shouldnt be), i come up with 10.58 assuming -.006 to -.008 i come up with 10.7 - 10.8. whats the ICL of the cam.

how's the MAF working out, any issues?

Lady Redhawk

iTrader: (6)

Yeah, thats confussing the way they have the tq on the right on a different line.

Lady Redhawk

iTrader: (6)

Not sure what the deck height is, believe it is .015 higher than stock. They are the 66cc and the deck is 3/4" thick. He only had .048 clearance with the stock heads And they say he should have .052 clearance now even with the .040 gaskets. I am trying to remember what all the cam specs are, but I think ICL is 110 and 111LSA.